Tempo of Diversification of Global Amphibians: One-Constant Rate, One-Continuous Shift or Multiple-Discrete Shifts?

In this brief report, alternative time-varying diversification rate models were fitted onto the phylogeny of global amphibians by considering one-constant-rate (OCR), one-continuous-shift (OCS) and multiplediscrete- shifts (MDS) situations. The OCS diversification model was rejected by γ statistic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Youhua Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Systematic Zoology 2014-01-01
Series:Animal Systematics, Evolution and Diversity
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-ased.org/Upload/files/e-ased.org/07-Tempo-(0031).165209.pdf
id doaj-8581bfac63ef4917804b715d0a55e082
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8581bfac63ef4917804b715d0a55e0822020-11-25T00:46:51ZengKorean Society of Systematic ZoologyAnimal Systematics, Evolution and Diversity2234-69532234-81902014-01-01301394310.5635/ASED.2014.30.1.039Tempo of Diversification of Global Amphibians: One-Constant Rate, One-Continuous Shift or Multiple-Discrete Shifts?Youhua Chen0Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, CanadaIn this brief report, alternative time-varying diversification rate models were fitted onto the phylogeny of global amphibians by considering one-constant-rate (OCR), one-continuous-shift (OCS) and multiplediscrete- shifts (MDS) situations. The OCS diversification model was rejected by γ statistic (γ=-5.556, p⁄ 0.001), implying the existence of shifting diversification rates for global amphibian phylogeny. Through model selection, MDS diversification model outperformed OCS and OCR models using “laser” package under R environment. Moreover, MDS models, implemented using another R package “MEDUSA”, indicated that there were sixteen shifts over the internal nodes for amphibian phylogeny. Conclusively, both OCS and MDS models are recommended to compare so as to better quantify rate-shifting trends of species diversification. MDS diversification models should be preferential for large phylogenies using “MEDUSA” package in which any arbitrary numbers of shifts are allowed to model.http://www.e-ased.org/Upload/files/e-ased.org/07-Tempo-(0031).165209.pdfadaptive radiationrate variationmaximum likelihoodmodel selection and comparison
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Youhua Chen
spellingShingle Youhua Chen
Tempo of Diversification of Global Amphibians: One-Constant Rate, One-Continuous Shift or Multiple-Discrete Shifts?
Animal Systematics, Evolution and Diversity
adaptive radiation
rate variation
maximum likelihood
model selection and comparison
author_facet Youhua Chen
author_sort Youhua Chen
title Tempo of Diversification of Global Amphibians: One-Constant Rate, One-Continuous Shift or Multiple-Discrete Shifts?
title_short Tempo of Diversification of Global Amphibians: One-Constant Rate, One-Continuous Shift or Multiple-Discrete Shifts?
title_full Tempo of Diversification of Global Amphibians: One-Constant Rate, One-Continuous Shift or Multiple-Discrete Shifts?
title_fullStr Tempo of Diversification of Global Amphibians: One-Constant Rate, One-Continuous Shift or Multiple-Discrete Shifts?
title_full_unstemmed Tempo of Diversification of Global Amphibians: One-Constant Rate, One-Continuous Shift or Multiple-Discrete Shifts?
title_sort tempo of diversification of global amphibians: one-constant rate, one-continuous shift or multiple-discrete shifts?
publisher Korean Society of Systematic Zoology
series Animal Systematics, Evolution and Diversity
issn 2234-6953
2234-8190
publishDate 2014-01-01
description In this brief report, alternative time-varying diversification rate models were fitted onto the phylogeny of global amphibians by considering one-constant-rate (OCR), one-continuous-shift (OCS) and multiplediscrete- shifts (MDS) situations. The OCS diversification model was rejected by γ statistic (γ=-5.556, p⁄ 0.001), implying the existence of shifting diversification rates for global amphibian phylogeny. Through model selection, MDS diversification model outperformed OCS and OCR models using “laser” package under R environment. Moreover, MDS models, implemented using another R package “MEDUSA”, indicated that there were sixteen shifts over the internal nodes for amphibian phylogeny. Conclusively, both OCS and MDS models are recommended to compare so as to better quantify rate-shifting trends of species diversification. MDS diversification models should be preferential for large phylogenies using “MEDUSA” package in which any arbitrary numbers of shifts are allowed to model.
topic adaptive radiation
rate variation
maximum likelihood
model selection and comparison
url http://www.e-ased.org/Upload/files/e-ased.org/07-Tempo-(0031).165209.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT youhuachen tempoofdiversificationofglobalamphibiansoneconstantrateonecontinuousshiftormultiplediscreteshifts
_version_ 1725262668426641408