The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy
Introduction: Single-port laparoscopy is prospected as the future of minimal invasive surgery. It is hypothesised to cause less post operative pain, with a shorter hospitalisation period and improved cosmetic results. Population- and patient-based opinion is important for the adaptation of new techn...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Minimal Access Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2014;volume=10;issue=3;spage=119;epage=125;aulast=Fransen |
id |
doaj-8552d41137b742d797488517d76ed7bd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8552d41137b742d797488517d76ed7bd2020-11-25T00:02:31ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Minimal Access Surgery0972-99411998-39212014-01-0110311912510.4103/0972-9941.134874The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopySofie AF FransenEPM BroedersLPS StassenN D BouvyIntroduction: Single-port laparoscopy is prospected as the future of minimal invasive surgery. It is hypothesised to cause less post operative pain, with a shorter hospitalisation period and improved cosmetic results. Population- and patient-based opinion is important for the adaptation of new techniques. This study aimed to assess the opinion and perception of a healthy population and a patient population on single-port laparoscopy compared with conventional laparoscopy. Materials And Methods: An anonymous 33-item questionnaire, describing conventional and single-port laparoscopy, was given to 101 patients and 104 healthy volunteers. The survey participants (median age 44 years; range 17-82 years) were asked questions about their personal situation and their expectations and perceptions of the two different surgical techniques; conventional multi-port laparoscopy and single-port laparoscopy. Results: A total of 72% of the participants had never heard of single-port laparoscopy before. The most important concern in both groups was the risk of surgical complications. When complication risks remain similar, 80% prefers single-port laparoscopy to conventional laparoscopy. When the risk of complications increases from 1% to 10%, 43% of all participants prefer single-port laparoscopy. A total of 70% of the participants are prepared to receive treatment in another hospital if single-port surgery is not performed in their hometown hospital. The preference for single-port approach was higher in the female population. Conclusion: Although cure and safety remain the main concerns, the population and patients group have a favourable perception of single-port surgery. The impact of public opinion and patient perception towards innovative techniques is undeniable. If the safety of the two different procedures is similar, this study shows a positive attitude of both participant groups in favour of single-port laparoscopy. However, solid scientific proof for the safety and feasibility of this new surgical technique needs to be obtained before this procedure can be implemented into everyday practice.http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2014;volume=10;issue=3;spage=119;epage=125;aulast=FransenNOTESsingle-port laparoscopyquestionnaire |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sofie AF Fransen EPM Broeders LPS Stassen N D Bouvy |
spellingShingle |
Sofie AF Fransen EPM Broeders LPS Stassen N D Bouvy The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy Journal of Minimal Access Surgery NOTES single-port laparoscopy questionnaire |
author_facet |
Sofie AF Fransen EPM Broeders LPS Stassen N D Bouvy |
author_sort |
Sofie AF Fransen |
title |
The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy |
title_short |
The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy |
title_full |
The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy |
title_fullStr |
The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed |
The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy |
title_sort |
voice of holland: dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery |
issn |
0972-9941 1998-3921 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
Introduction: Single-port laparoscopy is prospected as the future of minimal invasive surgery. It is hypothesised to cause less post operative pain, with a shorter hospitalisation period and improved cosmetic results. Population- and patient-based opinion is important for the adaptation of new techniques. This study aimed to assess the opinion and perception of a healthy population and a patient population on single-port laparoscopy compared with conventional laparoscopy. Materials And Methods: An anonymous 33-item questionnaire, describing conventional and single-port laparoscopy, was given to 101 patients and 104 healthy volunteers. The survey participants (median age 44 years; range 17-82 years) were asked questions about their personal situation and their expectations and perceptions of the two different surgical techniques; conventional multi-port laparoscopy and single-port laparoscopy. Results: A total of 72% of the participants had never heard of single-port laparoscopy before. The most important concern in both groups was the risk of surgical complications. When complication risks remain similar, 80% prefers single-port laparoscopy to conventional laparoscopy. When the risk of complications increases from 1% to 10%, 43% of all participants prefer single-port laparoscopy. A total of 70% of the participants are prepared to receive treatment in another hospital if single-port surgery is not performed in their hometown hospital. The preference for single-port approach was higher in the female population. Conclusion: Although cure and safety remain the main concerns, the population and patients group have a favourable perception of single-port surgery. The impact of public opinion and patient perception towards innovative techniques is undeniable. If the safety of the two different procedures is similar, this study shows a positive attitude of both participant groups in favour of single-port laparoscopy. However, solid scientific proof for the safety and feasibility of this new surgical technique needs to be obtained before this procedure can be implemented into everyday practice. |
topic |
NOTES single-port laparoscopy questionnaire |
url |
http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2014;volume=10;issue=3;spage=119;epage=125;aulast=Fransen |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sofieaffransen thevoiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy AT epmbroeders thevoiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy AT lpsstassen thevoiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy AT ndbouvy thevoiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy AT sofieaffransen voiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy AT epmbroeders voiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy AT lpsstassen voiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy AT ndbouvy voiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy |
_version_ |
1725437365049098240 |