The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy

Introduction: Single-port laparoscopy is prospected as the future of minimal invasive surgery. It is hypothesised to cause less post operative pain, with a shorter hospitalisation period and improved cosmetic results. Population- and patient-based opinion is important for the adaptation of new techn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sofie AF Fransen, EPM Broeders, LPS Stassen, N D Bouvy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2014;volume=10;issue=3;spage=119;epage=125;aulast=Fransen
id doaj-8552d41137b742d797488517d76ed7bd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8552d41137b742d797488517d76ed7bd2020-11-25T00:02:31ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Minimal Access Surgery0972-99411998-39212014-01-0110311912510.4103/0972-9941.134874The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopySofie AF FransenEPM BroedersLPS StassenN D BouvyIntroduction: Single-port laparoscopy is prospected as the future of minimal invasive surgery. It is hypothesised to cause less post operative pain, with a shorter hospitalisation period and improved cosmetic results. Population- and patient-based opinion is important for the adaptation of new techniques. This study aimed to assess the opinion and perception of a healthy population and a patient population on single-port laparoscopy compared with conventional laparoscopy. Materials And Methods: An anonymous 33-item questionnaire, describing conventional and single-port laparoscopy, was given to 101 patients and 104 healthy volunteers. The survey participants (median age 44 years; range 17-82 years) were asked questions about their personal situation and their expectations and perceptions of the two different surgical techniques; conventional multi-port laparoscopy and single-port laparoscopy. Results: A total of 72% of the participants had never heard of single-port laparoscopy before. The most important concern in both groups was the risk of surgical complications. When complication risks remain similar, 80% prefers single-port laparoscopy to conventional laparoscopy. When the risk of complications increases from 1% to 10%, 43% of all participants prefer single-port laparoscopy. A total of 70% of the participants are prepared to receive treatment in another hospital if single-port surgery is not performed in their hometown hospital. The preference for single-port approach was higher in the female population. Conclusion: Although cure and safety remain the main concerns, the population and patients group have a favourable perception of single-port surgery. The impact of public opinion and patient perception towards innovative techniques is undeniable. If the safety of the two different procedures is similar, this study shows a positive attitude of both participant groups in favour of single-port laparoscopy. However, solid scientific proof for the safety and feasibility of this new surgical technique needs to be obtained before this procedure can be implemented into everyday practice.http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2014;volume=10;issue=3;spage=119;epage=125;aulast=FransenNOTESsingle-port laparoscopyquestionnaire
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sofie AF Fransen
EPM Broeders
LPS Stassen
N D Bouvy
spellingShingle Sofie AF Fransen
EPM Broeders
LPS Stassen
N D Bouvy
The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
NOTES
single-port laparoscopy
questionnaire
author_facet Sofie AF Fransen
EPM Broeders
LPS Stassen
N D Bouvy
author_sort Sofie AF Fransen
title The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy
title_short The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy
title_full The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy
title_fullStr The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy
title_full_unstemmed The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy
title_sort voice of holland: dutch public and patient′s opinion favours single-port laparoscopy
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
issn 0972-9941
1998-3921
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Introduction: Single-port laparoscopy is prospected as the future of minimal invasive surgery. It is hypothesised to cause less post operative pain, with a shorter hospitalisation period and improved cosmetic results. Population- and patient-based opinion is important for the adaptation of new techniques. This study aimed to assess the opinion and perception of a healthy population and a patient population on single-port laparoscopy compared with conventional laparoscopy. Materials And Methods: An anonymous 33-item questionnaire, describing conventional and single-port laparoscopy, was given to 101 patients and 104 healthy volunteers. The survey participants (median age 44 years; range 17-82 years) were asked questions about their personal situation and their expectations and perceptions of the two different surgical techniques; conventional multi-port laparoscopy and single-port laparoscopy. Results: A total of 72% of the participants had never heard of single-port laparoscopy before. The most important concern in both groups was the risk of surgical complications. When complication risks remain similar, 80% prefers single-port laparoscopy to conventional laparoscopy. When the risk of complications increases from 1% to 10%, 43% of all participants prefer single-port laparoscopy. A total of 70% of the participants are prepared to receive treatment in another hospital if single-port surgery is not performed in their hometown hospital. The preference for single-port approach was higher in the female population. Conclusion: Although cure and safety remain the main concerns, the population and patients group have a favourable perception of single-port surgery. The impact of public opinion and patient perception towards innovative techniques is undeniable. If the safety of the two different procedures is similar, this study shows a positive attitude of both participant groups in favour of single-port laparoscopy. However, solid scientific proof for the safety and feasibility of this new surgical technique needs to be obtained before this procedure can be implemented into everyday practice.
topic NOTES
single-port laparoscopy
questionnaire
url http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2014;volume=10;issue=3;spage=119;epage=125;aulast=Fransen
work_keys_str_mv AT sofieaffransen thevoiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy
AT epmbroeders thevoiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy
AT lpsstassen thevoiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy
AT ndbouvy thevoiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy
AT sofieaffransen voiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy
AT epmbroeders voiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy
AT lpsstassen voiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy
AT ndbouvy voiceofhollanddutchpublicandpatientsopinionfavourssingleportlaparoscopy
_version_ 1725437365049098240