Measurement Comparability of Reading in the English and French Canadian Populations: Special Case of the 2011 Progress in International Reading Literacy Study
The purpose of this study is to examine item equivalence and score comparability of the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2011 for the Canadian French and English language groups. Two methods of differential item functioning were conducted to examine item equivalence across 13...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feduc.2019.00120/full |
id |
doaj-854ec05a063c4e76a8d561d0748508ce |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-854ec05a063c4e76a8d561d0748508ce2020-11-25T02:47:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Education2504-284X2019-12-01410.3389/feduc.2019.00120487576Measurement Comparability of Reading in the English and French Canadian Populations: Special Case of the 2011 Progress in International Reading Literacy StudyShawna Goodrich0Kadriye Ercikan1Department of National Defence, Ottawa, ON, CanadaEducational Testing Service, University of British Columbia, Princeton, NJ, United StatesThe purpose of this study is to examine item equivalence and score comparability of the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2011 for the Canadian French and English language groups. Two methods of differential item functioning were conducted to examine item equivalence across 13 test booklets designed to assess reading literacy in early years of schooling. Four bilingual reviewers with expertise in reading literacy conducted independent, linguistic, and cultural reviews to identify both the degree of item equivalence and potential sources of differences between language versions of released items. Results indicate that an average of 25% of items per booklet function differentially at the item level. Reviews by experts indicate differences between the two language versions on some items flagged as displaying differential item functioning (DIF). Some of these were identified to have linguistic differences pointing to differential difficulty levels in the two language versions.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feduc.2019.00120/fullscore comparabilitytest equivalenceitem equivalencedifferential item functioninginternational assessmentreading literacy achievement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shawna Goodrich Kadriye Ercikan |
spellingShingle |
Shawna Goodrich Kadriye Ercikan Measurement Comparability of Reading in the English and French Canadian Populations: Special Case of the 2011 Progress in International Reading Literacy Study Frontiers in Education score comparability test equivalence item equivalence differential item functioning international assessment reading literacy achievement |
author_facet |
Shawna Goodrich Kadriye Ercikan |
author_sort |
Shawna Goodrich |
title |
Measurement Comparability of Reading in the English and French Canadian Populations: Special Case of the 2011 Progress in International Reading Literacy Study |
title_short |
Measurement Comparability of Reading in the English and French Canadian Populations: Special Case of the 2011 Progress in International Reading Literacy Study |
title_full |
Measurement Comparability of Reading in the English and French Canadian Populations: Special Case of the 2011 Progress in International Reading Literacy Study |
title_fullStr |
Measurement Comparability of Reading in the English and French Canadian Populations: Special Case of the 2011 Progress in International Reading Literacy Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Measurement Comparability of Reading in the English and French Canadian Populations: Special Case of the 2011 Progress in International Reading Literacy Study |
title_sort |
measurement comparability of reading in the english and french canadian populations: special case of the 2011 progress in international reading literacy study |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Education |
issn |
2504-284X |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
The purpose of this study is to examine item equivalence and score comparability of the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2011 for the Canadian French and English language groups. Two methods of differential item functioning were conducted to examine item equivalence across 13 test booklets designed to assess reading literacy in early years of schooling. Four bilingual reviewers with expertise in reading literacy conducted independent, linguistic, and cultural reviews to identify both the degree of item equivalence and potential sources of differences between language versions of released items. Results indicate that an average of 25% of items per booklet function differentially at the item level. Reviews by experts indicate differences between the two language versions on some items flagged as displaying differential item functioning (DIF). Some of these were identified to have linguistic differences pointing to differential difficulty levels in the two language versions. |
topic |
score comparability test equivalence item equivalence differential item functioning international assessment reading literacy achievement |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feduc.2019.00120/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shawnagoodrich measurementcomparabilityofreadingintheenglishandfrenchcanadianpopulationsspecialcaseofthe2011progressininternationalreadingliteracystudy AT kadriyeercikan measurementcomparabilityofreadingintheenglishandfrenchcanadianpopulationsspecialcaseofthe2011progressininternationalreadingliteracystudy |
_version_ |
1724754757194612736 |