Impact of Height Estimation on Tidal Volume Calculation for Protective Ventilation—A Prospective Observational Study

Objectives:. The current standard of care to deliver invasive mechanical ventilation support is the protective ventilation approach. One pillar of this approach is the limitation of tidal volume to less than 6 mL/Kg of predicted body weight. Predicted body weight is calculated from patient’s height....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: André R. Alexandre, MD, Filipa R. Rocha, MD, Luís Landeiro, MD, Pedro Mota, MD, Joana Jones, MD, José A. Gomes, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2021-05-01
Series:Critical Care Explorations
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000422
id doaj-852fe9010c5142bcb56f820f2d08301d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-852fe9010c5142bcb56f820f2d08301d2021-06-28T03:11:39ZengWolters KluwerCritical Care Explorations2639-80282021-05-0135e042210.1097/CCE.0000000000000422202105000-00013Impact of Height Estimation on Tidal Volume Calculation for Protective Ventilation—A Prospective Observational StudyAndré R. Alexandre, MD0Filipa R. Rocha, MD1Luís Landeiro, MD2Pedro Mota, MD3Joana Jones, MD4José A. Gomes, MD5All authors: Department of Intensive Care, Hospital da Luz – Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.All authors: Department of Intensive Care, Hospital da Luz – Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.All authors: Department of Intensive Care, Hospital da Luz – Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.All authors: Department of Intensive Care, Hospital da Luz – Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.All authors: Department of Intensive Care, Hospital da Luz – Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.All authors: Department of Intensive Care, Hospital da Luz – Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.Objectives:. The current standard of care to deliver invasive mechanical ventilation support is the protective ventilation approach. One pillar of this approach is the limitation of tidal volume to less than 6 mL/Kg of predicted body weight. Predicted body weight is calculated from patient’s height. Yet, little is known about the potential impact of errors arising from visual height estimation, a common practice, to calculate tidal volumes. The aim of this study was to evaluate that impact on tidal volume calculation to use during protective ventilation. Design:. Prospective observational study. Setting:. An eight-bed polyvalent ICU. Patients:. Adult patients (≥ 18 yr). Interventions:. None. Measurements and Main Results:. Tidal volumes were calculated from visual height estimates made by physicians, nurses, and patients themselves and compared with tidal volumes calculated from measured heights. Comparisons were made using the paired t test. Modified Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between height estimates and measurements. One-hundred patients were recruited. Regardless of the height estimator, all the mean tidal volumes would be greater than 6 mL/Kg predicted body weight (all p < 0.001). Additionally, tidal volumes would be greater than or equal to 6.5 mL/Kg predicted body weight in 18% of patients’ estimates, 25% of physicians’ estimates, and 30% of nurses’ estimates. Patients with lower stature (< 165 cm), older age, and surgical typology of admission were at increased risk of being ventilated with tidal volumes above protective threshold. Conclusions:. The clinical benefit of the protective ventilation strategy can be offset by using visual height estimates to calculate tidal volumes. Additionally, this approach can be harmful and potentially increase mortality by exposing patients to tidal volumes greater than or equal to 6.5 mL/Kg predicted body weight. In the interest of patient safety, every ICU patient should have his or her height accurately measured.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000422
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author André R. Alexandre, MD
Filipa R. Rocha, MD
Luís Landeiro, MD
Pedro Mota, MD
Joana Jones, MD
José A. Gomes, MD
spellingShingle André R. Alexandre, MD
Filipa R. Rocha, MD
Luís Landeiro, MD
Pedro Mota, MD
Joana Jones, MD
José A. Gomes, MD
Impact of Height Estimation on Tidal Volume Calculation for Protective Ventilation—A Prospective Observational Study
Critical Care Explorations
author_facet André R. Alexandre, MD
Filipa R. Rocha, MD
Luís Landeiro, MD
Pedro Mota, MD
Joana Jones, MD
José A. Gomes, MD
author_sort André R. Alexandre, MD
title Impact of Height Estimation on Tidal Volume Calculation for Protective Ventilation—A Prospective Observational Study
title_short Impact of Height Estimation on Tidal Volume Calculation for Protective Ventilation—A Prospective Observational Study
title_full Impact of Height Estimation on Tidal Volume Calculation for Protective Ventilation—A Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Impact of Height Estimation on Tidal Volume Calculation for Protective Ventilation—A Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Height Estimation on Tidal Volume Calculation for Protective Ventilation—A Prospective Observational Study
title_sort impact of height estimation on tidal volume calculation for protective ventilation—a prospective observational study
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Critical Care Explorations
issn 2639-8028
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Objectives:. The current standard of care to deliver invasive mechanical ventilation support is the protective ventilation approach. One pillar of this approach is the limitation of tidal volume to less than 6 mL/Kg of predicted body weight. Predicted body weight is calculated from patient’s height. Yet, little is known about the potential impact of errors arising from visual height estimation, a common practice, to calculate tidal volumes. The aim of this study was to evaluate that impact on tidal volume calculation to use during protective ventilation. Design:. Prospective observational study. Setting:. An eight-bed polyvalent ICU. Patients:. Adult patients (≥ 18 yr). Interventions:. None. Measurements and Main Results:. Tidal volumes were calculated from visual height estimates made by physicians, nurses, and patients themselves and compared with tidal volumes calculated from measured heights. Comparisons were made using the paired t test. Modified Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between height estimates and measurements. One-hundred patients were recruited. Regardless of the height estimator, all the mean tidal volumes would be greater than 6 mL/Kg predicted body weight (all p < 0.001). Additionally, tidal volumes would be greater than or equal to 6.5 mL/Kg predicted body weight in 18% of patients’ estimates, 25% of physicians’ estimates, and 30% of nurses’ estimates. Patients with lower stature (< 165 cm), older age, and surgical typology of admission were at increased risk of being ventilated with tidal volumes above protective threshold. Conclusions:. The clinical benefit of the protective ventilation strategy can be offset by using visual height estimates to calculate tidal volumes. Additionally, this approach can be harmful and potentially increase mortality by exposing patients to tidal volumes greater than or equal to 6.5 mL/Kg predicted body weight. In the interest of patient safety, every ICU patient should have his or her height accurately measured.
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000422
work_keys_str_mv AT andreralexandremd impactofheightestimationontidalvolumecalculationforprotectiveventilationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT filiparrochamd impactofheightestimationontidalvolumecalculationforprotectiveventilationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT luislandeiromd impactofheightestimationontidalvolumecalculationforprotectiveventilationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT pedromotamd impactofheightestimationontidalvolumecalculationforprotectiveventilationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT joanajonesmd impactofheightestimationontidalvolumecalculationforprotectiveventilationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT joseagomesmd impactofheightestimationontidalvolumecalculationforprotectiveventilationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
_version_ 1721357092908957696