Multidisciplinary Prognostication Using the Palliative Prognostic Score in an Australian Cancer Center

Context Accurate prognostication is important in oncology and palliative care. A multidisciplinary approach to prognostication provides a novel approach, but its accuracy and application is poorly researched. In this study, we describe and analyze our experience of multidisciplinary prognostication...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruwani Mendis, Wee-Kheng Soo, Diana Zannino, Natasha Michael, Odette Spruyt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-01-01
Series:Palliative Care
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/PCRT.S24411
id doaj-852aa2f70e044c0fb26b0603c2fd8f1b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-852aa2f70e044c0fb26b0603c2fd8f1b2020-11-25T03:08:25ZengSAGE PublishingPalliative Care1178-22422015-01-01910.4137/PCRT.S24411Multidisciplinary Prognostication Using the Palliative Prognostic Score in an Australian Cancer CenterRuwani Mendis0Wee-Kheng Soo1Diana Zannino2Natasha Michael3Odette Spruyt4Austin Health, Department of Palliative Care, Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia.Department of Palliative Care, Cabrini Health, Prahran, VIC, Australia.Department of Pain & Palliative Care, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia.Context Accurate prognostication is important in oncology and palliative care. A multidisciplinary approach to prognostication provides a novel approach, but its accuracy and application is poorly researched. In this study, we describe and analyze our experience of multidisciplinary prognostication in palliative care patients with cancer. Objectives To assess our accuracy of prognostication using multidisciplinary team prediction of survival (MTPS) alone and within the Palliative Prognostic (PaP) Score. Methods This retrospective study included all new patients referred to a palliative care consultation service in a tertiary cancer center between January 2010 and December 2011. Initial assessment data for 421 inpatients and 223 outpatients were analyzed according to inpatient and outpatient groups to evaluate the accuracy of prognostication using MTPS alone and within the PaP score (MTPS-PaP) and their correlation with overall survival. Results Inpatients with MTPS-PaP group A, B, and C had a median survival of 10.9, 3.4, and 0.7 weeks, respectively, and a 30-day survival probability of 81%, 40%, and 10%, respectively. Outpatients with MTPS-PaP group A and B had a median survival of 17.3 and 5.1 weeks, respectively, and a 30-day survival probability of 94% and 50%, respectively. MTPS overestimated survival by a factor of 1.5 for inpatients and 1.2 for outpatients. The MTPS-PaP score correlated better than MTPS alone with overall survival. Conclusion This study suggests that a multidisciplinary team approach to prognostication within routine clinical practice is possible and may substitute for single clinician prediction of survival within the PaP score without detracting from its accuracy. Multidisciplinary team prognostication can assist treating teams to recognize and articulate prognosis, facilitate treatment decisions, and plan end-of-life care appropriately. PaP was less useful in the outpatient setting, given the longer survival interval of the outpatient palliative care patient group.https://doi.org/10.4137/PCRT.S24411
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ruwani Mendis
Wee-Kheng Soo
Diana Zannino
Natasha Michael
Odette Spruyt
spellingShingle Ruwani Mendis
Wee-Kheng Soo
Diana Zannino
Natasha Michael
Odette Spruyt
Multidisciplinary Prognostication Using the Palliative Prognostic Score in an Australian Cancer Center
Palliative Care
author_facet Ruwani Mendis
Wee-Kheng Soo
Diana Zannino
Natasha Michael
Odette Spruyt
author_sort Ruwani Mendis
title Multidisciplinary Prognostication Using the Palliative Prognostic Score in an Australian Cancer Center
title_short Multidisciplinary Prognostication Using the Palliative Prognostic Score in an Australian Cancer Center
title_full Multidisciplinary Prognostication Using the Palliative Prognostic Score in an Australian Cancer Center
title_fullStr Multidisciplinary Prognostication Using the Palliative Prognostic Score in an Australian Cancer Center
title_full_unstemmed Multidisciplinary Prognostication Using the Palliative Prognostic Score in an Australian Cancer Center
title_sort multidisciplinary prognostication using the palliative prognostic score in an australian cancer center
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Palliative Care
issn 1178-2242
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Context Accurate prognostication is important in oncology and palliative care. A multidisciplinary approach to prognostication provides a novel approach, but its accuracy and application is poorly researched. In this study, we describe and analyze our experience of multidisciplinary prognostication in palliative care patients with cancer. Objectives To assess our accuracy of prognostication using multidisciplinary team prediction of survival (MTPS) alone and within the Palliative Prognostic (PaP) Score. Methods This retrospective study included all new patients referred to a palliative care consultation service in a tertiary cancer center between January 2010 and December 2011. Initial assessment data for 421 inpatients and 223 outpatients were analyzed according to inpatient and outpatient groups to evaluate the accuracy of prognostication using MTPS alone and within the PaP score (MTPS-PaP) and their correlation with overall survival. Results Inpatients with MTPS-PaP group A, B, and C had a median survival of 10.9, 3.4, and 0.7 weeks, respectively, and a 30-day survival probability of 81%, 40%, and 10%, respectively. Outpatients with MTPS-PaP group A and B had a median survival of 17.3 and 5.1 weeks, respectively, and a 30-day survival probability of 94% and 50%, respectively. MTPS overestimated survival by a factor of 1.5 for inpatients and 1.2 for outpatients. The MTPS-PaP score correlated better than MTPS alone with overall survival. Conclusion This study suggests that a multidisciplinary team approach to prognostication within routine clinical practice is possible and may substitute for single clinician prediction of survival within the PaP score without detracting from its accuracy. Multidisciplinary team prognostication can assist treating teams to recognize and articulate prognosis, facilitate treatment decisions, and plan end-of-life care appropriately. PaP was less useful in the outpatient setting, given the longer survival interval of the outpatient palliative care patient group.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/PCRT.S24411
work_keys_str_mv AT ruwanimendis multidisciplinaryprognosticationusingthepalliativeprognosticscoreinanaustraliancancercenter
AT weekhengsoo multidisciplinaryprognosticationusingthepalliativeprognosticscoreinanaustraliancancercenter
AT dianazannino multidisciplinaryprognosticationusingthepalliativeprognosticscoreinanaustraliancancercenter
AT natashamichael multidisciplinaryprognosticationusingthepalliativeprognosticscoreinanaustraliancancercenter
AT odettespruyt multidisciplinaryprognosticationusingthepalliativeprognosticscoreinanaustraliancancercenter
_version_ 1724666590219206656