Is preference for mHealth intervention delivery platform associated with delivery platform familiarity?
Abstract Background The aim of this paper was to ascertain whether greater familiarity with a smartphone or tablet was associated with participants’ preferred mobile delivery modality for eHealth interventions. Methods Data from 1865 people who participated in the Australian Health and Social Scienc...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2016-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3316-2 |
id |
doaj-8527b4a932534b0c804ccaf5449d2ce6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8527b4a932534b0c804ccaf5449d2ce62020-11-24T22:15:51ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582016-07-011611710.1186/s12889-016-3316-2Is preference for mHealth intervention delivery platform associated with delivery platform familiarity?Daniel Granger0Corneel Vandelanotte1Mitch J. Duncan2Stephanie Alley3Stephanie Schoeppe4Camille Short5Amanda Rebar6Physical Activity Research Group, School of Human, Health and Social Sciences, Building 18, Central Queensland UniversityPhysical Activity Research Group, School of Human, Health and Social Sciences, Building 18, Central Queensland UniversityPriority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Advanced Technology CentrePhysical Activity Research Group, School of Human, Health and Social Sciences, Building 18, Central Queensland UniversityPhysical Activity Research Group, School of Human, Health and Social Sciences, Building 18, Central Queensland UniversitySouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of AdelaidePhysical Activity Research Group, School of Human, Health and Social Sciences, Building 18, Central Queensland UniversityAbstract Background The aim of this paper was to ascertain whether greater familiarity with a smartphone or tablet was associated with participants’ preferred mobile delivery modality for eHealth interventions. Methods Data from 1865 people who participated in the Australian Health and Social Science panel study were included into two multinomial logistic regression analyses in which preference for smartphone and tablet delivery for general or personalised eHealth interventions were regressed onto device familiarity and the covariates of sex, age and education. Results People were more likely to prefer both general and personalised eHealth interventions presented on tablets if they reported high or moderate tablet familiarity (compared to low familiarity) and people were more likely to prefer both general and personalised eHealth interventions presented on smartphones if they reported high or moderate smartphone familiarity, were younger, and had university education (compared to completing high school or less). Conclusion People prefer receiving eHealth interventions on the mobile devices they are most familiar with. These findings have important implications that should be considered when developing eHealth interventions, and demonstrates that eHealth interventions should be delivered using multiple platforms simultaneously to optimally cater for as many people as possible.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3316-2SmartphoneTabletWeb-basedmHealthOnlineInternet |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Daniel Granger Corneel Vandelanotte Mitch J. Duncan Stephanie Alley Stephanie Schoeppe Camille Short Amanda Rebar |
spellingShingle |
Daniel Granger Corneel Vandelanotte Mitch J. Duncan Stephanie Alley Stephanie Schoeppe Camille Short Amanda Rebar Is preference for mHealth intervention delivery platform associated with delivery platform familiarity? BMC Public Health Smartphone Tablet Web-based mHealth Online Internet |
author_facet |
Daniel Granger Corneel Vandelanotte Mitch J. Duncan Stephanie Alley Stephanie Schoeppe Camille Short Amanda Rebar |
author_sort |
Daniel Granger |
title |
Is preference for mHealth intervention delivery platform associated with delivery platform familiarity? |
title_short |
Is preference for mHealth intervention delivery platform associated with delivery platform familiarity? |
title_full |
Is preference for mHealth intervention delivery platform associated with delivery platform familiarity? |
title_fullStr |
Is preference for mHealth intervention delivery platform associated with delivery platform familiarity? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is preference for mHealth intervention delivery platform associated with delivery platform familiarity? |
title_sort |
is preference for mhealth intervention delivery platform associated with delivery platform familiarity? |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Public Health |
issn |
1471-2458 |
publishDate |
2016-07-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The aim of this paper was to ascertain whether greater familiarity with a smartphone or tablet was associated with participants’ preferred mobile delivery modality for eHealth interventions. Methods Data from 1865 people who participated in the Australian Health and Social Science panel study were included into two multinomial logistic regression analyses in which preference for smartphone and tablet delivery for general or personalised eHealth interventions were regressed onto device familiarity and the covariates of sex, age and education. Results People were more likely to prefer both general and personalised eHealth interventions presented on tablets if they reported high or moderate tablet familiarity (compared to low familiarity) and people were more likely to prefer both general and personalised eHealth interventions presented on smartphones if they reported high or moderate smartphone familiarity, were younger, and had university education (compared to completing high school or less). Conclusion People prefer receiving eHealth interventions on the mobile devices they are most familiar with. These findings have important implications that should be considered when developing eHealth interventions, and demonstrates that eHealth interventions should be delivered using multiple platforms simultaneously to optimally cater for as many people as possible. |
topic |
Smartphone Tablet Web-based mHealth Online Internet |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3316-2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danielgranger ispreferenceformhealthinterventiondeliveryplatformassociatedwithdeliveryplatformfamiliarity AT corneelvandelanotte ispreferenceformhealthinterventiondeliveryplatformassociatedwithdeliveryplatformfamiliarity AT mitchjduncan ispreferenceformhealthinterventiondeliveryplatformassociatedwithdeliveryplatformfamiliarity AT stephaniealley ispreferenceformhealthinterventiondeliveryplatformassociatedwithdeliveryplatformfamiliarity AT stephanieschoeppe ispreferenceformhealthinterventiondeliveryplatformassociatedwithdeliveryplatformfamiliarity AT camilleshort ispreferenceformhealthinterventiondeliveryplatformassociatedwithdeliveryplatformfamiliarity AT amandarebar ispreferenceformhealthinterventiondeliveryplatformassociatedwithdeliveryplatformfamiliarity |
_version_ |
1725792713773678592 |