Comparative assessment of sodium selenite, selenised yeast and nanosized elemental selenium on performance response, immunity and antioxidative function of broiler chickens

Although selenium (Se) supplementation is a common practice in poultry, the best source and level has not been established yet. Thus, a 42-day experiment involving diets with three levels (0.1, 0.2 and 0.5 mg/kg) of supplemental Se from sodium selenite (SS), selenised yeast (SY) and nanoelemental Se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amirarsalan Pardechi, Sayed Ali Tabeidian, Mahmood Habibian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-12-01
Series:Italian Journal of Animal Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1819896
id doaj-8525f9b0ab884277b147cf30c00a8759
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8525f9b0ab884277b147cf30c00a87592021-06-25T10:30:44ZengTaylor & Francis GroupItalian Journal of Animal Science1594-40771828-051X2020-12-011911108112110.1080/1828051X.2020.18198961819896Comparative assessment of sodium selenite, selenised yeast and nanosized elemental selenium on performance response, immunity and antioxidative function of broiler chickensAmirarsalan Pardechi0Sayed Ali Tabeidian1Mahmood Habibian2Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, IranDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, IranYoung Researchers and Elite Club, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, IranAlthough selenium (Se) supplementation is a common practice in poultry, the best source and level has not been established yet. Thus, a 42-day experiment involving diets with three levels (0.1, 0.2 and 0.5 mg/kg) of supplemental Se from sodium selenite (SS), selenised yeast (SY) and nanoelemental Se (SN) was conducted to evaluate the possible differential responses of broiler chickens to inorganic, organic and nano Se sources relative to a control diet. Throughout the experiment, broilers receiving Se supplements had higher feed intake, body weight gain (BWG) and survival rate than the control. Broilers fed dietary SY or SN had improved BWG compared with those fed the SS-supplemented diets. Broilers treated with Se supplementation had increased serum glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) activities and produced higher antibody responses to avian influenza virus (AIV) and sheep red blood cell (SRBC) versus the control. These effects were enhanced with increasing Se addition, except for GPx that responded equally to all supplemental Se levels. Also, broilers receiving supplementary SY or SN exhibited higher anti-AIV and anti-SRBC titres along with more elevated serum Se, TrxR activity and total antioxidant capacity compared with those receiving SS. At the same time, SN had the most increasing effect on anti-SRBC titre. To conclude, diet supplementation with 0.5 mg/kg of Se in the form of SY or SN was capable of meeting the Se demands of broiler chickens for optimum growth and antioxidant capability, while SN seemed to be the most effective Se source in enhancing immunity.Highlights Diet supplementation with SN and SY, especially at 0.5 mg/kg diet, improved broiler performance and carcase quality of chickens compared with SS. SY and SN showed more favourable effects on oxidative status and immunocompetence. The best anti-SRBC titre was observed with SN.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1819896seleniumperformanceimmune responseantioxidant statusbroiler chicken
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amirarsalan Pardechi
Sayed Ali Tabeidian
Mahmood Habibian
spellingShingle Amirarsalan Pardechi
Sayed Ali Tabeidian
Mahmood Habibian
Comparative assessment of sodium selenite, selenised yeast and nanosized elemental selenium on performance response, immunity and antioxidative function of broiler chickens
Italian Journal of Animal Science
selenium
performance
immune response
antioxidant status
broiler chicken
author_facet Amirarsalan Pardechi
Sayed Ali Tabeidian
Mahmood Habibian
author_sort Amirarsalan Pardechi
title Comparative assessment of sodium selenite, selenised yeast and nanosized elemental selenium on performance response, immunity and antioxidative function of broiler chickens
title_short Comparative assessment of sodium selenite, selenised yeast and nanosized elemental selenium on performance response, immunity and antioxidative function of broiler chickens
title_full Comparative assessment of sodium selenite, selenised yeast and nanosized elemental selenium on performance response, immunity and antioxidative function of broiler chickens
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of sodium selenite, selenised yeast and nanosized elemental selenium on performance response, immunity and antioxidative function of broiler chickens
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of sodium selenite, selenised yeast and nanosized elemental selenium on performance response, immunity and antioxidative function of broiler chickens
title_sort comparative assessment of sodium selenite, selenised yeast and nanosized elemental selenium on performance response, immunity and antioxidative function of broiler chickens
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Italian Journal of Animal Science
issn 1594-4077
1828-051X
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Although selenium (Se) supplementation is a common practice in poultry, the best source and level has not been established yet. Thus, a 42-day experiment involving diets with three levels (0.1, 0.2 and 0.5 mg/kg) of supplemental Se from sodium selenite (SS), selenised yeast (SY) and nanoelemental Se (SN) was conducted to evaluate the possible differential responses of broiler chickens to inorganic, organic and nano Se sources relative to a control diet. Throughout the experiment, broilers receiving Se supplements had higher feed intake, body weight gain (BWG) and survival rate than the control. Broilers fed dietary SY or SN had improved BWG compared with those fed the SS-supplemented diets. Broilers treated with Se supplementation had increased serum glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) activities and produced higher antibody responses to avian influenza virus (AIV) and sheep red blood cell (SRBC) versus the control. These effects were enhanced with increasing Se addition, except for GPx that responded equally to all supplemental Se levels. Also, broilers receiving supplementary SY or SN exhibited higher anti-AIV and anti-SRBC titres along with more elevated serum Se, TrxR activity and total antioxidant capacity compared with those receiving SS. At the same time, SN had the most increasing effect on anti-SRBC titre. To conclude, diet supplementation with 0.5 mg/kg of Se in the form of SY or SN was capable of meeting the Se demands of broiler chickens for optimum growth and antioxidant capability, while SN seemed to be the most effective Se source in enhancing immunity.Highlights Diet supplementation with SN and SY, especially at 0.5 mg/kg diet, improved broiler performance and carcase quality of chickens compared with SS. SY and SN showed more favourable effects on oxidative status and immunocompetence. The best anti-SRBC titre was observed with SN.
topic selenium
performance
immune response
antioxidant status
broiler chicken
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1819896
work_keys_str_mv AT amirarsalanpardechi comparativeassessmentofsodiumseleniteselenisedyeastandnanosizedelementalseleniumonperformanceresponseimmunityandantioxidativefunctionofbroilerchickens
AT sayedalitabeidian comparativeassessmentofsodiumseleniteselenisedyeastandnanosizedelementalseleniumonperformanceresponseimmunityandantioxidativefunctionofbroilerchickens
AT mahmoodhabibian comparativeassessmentofsodiumseleniteselenisedyeastandnanosizedelementalseleniumonperformanceresponseimmunityandantioxidativefunctionofbroilerchickens
_version_ 1721360023752278016