Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility

Active travel is enthusiastically promoted in the Western world due to its clear and demonstrated individual and collective benefits. While active travel has been shown to be associated with features of the built environment such as density and land-use mix, it is also associated with walking and cy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David S. Vale, Miguel Saraiva, Mauro Pereira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Minnesota 2015-06-01
Series:Journal of Transport and Land Use
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/593
id doaj-8523ad450ebe447ba8586b2f5385fd24
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8523ad450ebe447ba8586b2f5385fd242021-08-31T04:38:08ZengUniversity of MinnesotaJournal of Transport and Land Use1938-78492015-06-019110.5198/jtlu.2015.593Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibilityDavid S. Vale0Miguel Saraiva1Mauro Pereira2Universidade de Lisboa CIAUD, Faculty of ArchitectureUniversidade de LisboaUniversidade de LisboaActive travel is enthusiastically promoted in the Western world due to its clear and demonstrated individual and collective benefits. While active travel has been shown to be associated with features of the built environment such as density and land-use mix, it is also associated with walking and cycling accessibility—which we designate as active accessibility. However, the measurement of active accessibil- ity is not straightforward and it can represent significantly different features of the built environment. This paper presents an extensive review of published research that measures active accessibility. We classified the literature into four categories based on the methodology used: distance-based, gravity-based or potential, topological or infra- structure-based, and walkability and walk score-type measures. A fifth category was created to classify outliers consisting of distinct methodological approaches or hybrids of the four main categories. We argue that almost all of these methods have conceptual and computational limitations, and that there are inconsistencies in the use of concepts and terms. Furthermore, no sensitivity analysis was carried out on the selected parameters. We conclude by presenting some guidelines that might improve the value and clarity of active accessibility research, theory, and practice.https://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/593accessibilityactive travelwalkingcyclingnon-motorized accessibilitypedestrian accessibility
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David S. Vale
Miguel Saraiva
Mauro Pereira
spellingShingle David S. Vale
Miguel Saraiva
Mauro Pereira
Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility
Journal of Transport and Land Use
accessibility
active travel
walking
cycling
non-motorized accessibility
pedestrian accessibility
author_facet David S. Vale
Miguel Saraiva
Mauro Pereira
author_sort David S. Vale
title Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility
title_short Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility
title_full Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility
title_fullStr Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility
title_full_unstemmed Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility
title_sort active accessibility: a review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility
publisher University of Minnesota
series Journal of Transport and Land Use
issn 1938-7849
publishDate 2015-06-01
description Active travel is enthusiastically promoted in the Western world due to its clear and demonstrated individual and collective benefits. While active travel has been shown to be associated with features of the built environment such as density and land-use mix, it is also associated with walking and cycling accessibility—which we designate as active accessibility. However, the measurement of active accessibil- ity is not straightforward and it can represent significantly different features of the built environment. This paper presents an extensive review of published research that measures active accessibility. We classified the literature into four categories based on the methodology used: distance-based, gravity-based or potential, topological or infra- structure-based, and walkability and walk score-type measures. A fifth category was created to classify outliers consisting of distinct methodological approaches or hybrids of the four main categories. We argue that almost all of these methods have conceptual and computational limitations, and that there are inconsistencies in the use of concepts and terms. Furthermore, no sensitivity analysis was carried out on the selected parameters. We conclude by presenting some guidelines that might improve the value and clarity of active accessibility research, theory, and practice.
topic accessibility
active travel
walking
cycling
non-motorized accessibility
pedestrian accessibility
url https://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/593
work_keys_str_mv AT davidsvale activeaccessibilityareviewofoperationalmeasuresofwalkingandcyclingaccessibility
AT miguelsaraiva activeaccessibilityareviewofoperationalmeasuresofwalkingandcyclingaccessibility
AT mauropereira activeaccessibilityareviewofoperationalmeasuresofwalkingandcyclingaccessibility
_version_ 1721184427123408896