Ethics teaching in a medical education environment: preferences for diversity of learning and assessment methods

Background: Ethics and professionalism are an integral part of medical school curricula; however, medical students’ views on these topics have not been assessed in many countries. Objective: The study aimed to examine medical students’ perceptions toward ethics and professionalism teaching, and its...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tahra AlMahmoud, M. Jawad Hashim, Margaret Ann Elzubeir, Frank Branicki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2017-01-01
Series:Medical Education Online
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2017.1328257
id doaj-85234ff7d23b488db3b8f55fb09ff425
record_format Article
spelling doaj-85234ff7d23b488db3b8f55fb09ff4252020-11-25T02:17:58ZengTaylor & Francis GroupMedical Education Online1087-29812017-01-0122110.1080/10872981.2017.13282571328257Ethics teaching in a medical education environment: preferences for diversity of learning and assessment methodsTahra AlMahmoud0M. Jawad Hashim1Margaret Ann Elzubeir2Frank Branicki3United Arab Emirates UniversityUnited Arab Emirates UniversityUnited Arab Emirates UniversityUnited Arab Emirates UniversityBackground: Ethics and professionalism are an integral part of medical school curricula; however, medical students’ views on these topics have not been assessed in many countries. Objective: The study aimed to examine medical students’ perceptions toward ethics and professionalism teaching, and its learning and assessment methods. Design: A self-administered questionnaire eliciting views on professionalism and ethics education was distributed to a total of 128 final-year medical students. Results: A total of 108 students completed the survey, with an 84% response rate. Medical students reported frequently encountering ethical conflicts during training but stated only a moderate level of ethics training at medical school (mean = 5.14 ± 1.8). They noted that their education had helped somewhat to deal with ethical conflicts (mean = 5.39 ± 2.0). Students strongly affirmed the importance of ethics education (mean = 7.63 ± 1.03) and endorsed the value of positive role models (mean = 7.45 ± 1.5) as the preferred learning method. The cohort voiced interest in direct faculty supervision as an approach to assessment of knowledge and skills (mean = 7.62 ± 1.26). Female students perceived greater need for more ethics education compared to males (p = < 0.05). Students who claimed that they had experienced some unprofessional treatment had a more limited view of the importance of ethics as a subject (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Medical students viewed ethics education positively and preferred clinically attuned methods for learning.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2017.1328257Medical ethicsprofessionalismteaching and learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tahra AlMahmoud
M. Jawad Hashim
Margaret Ann Elzubeir
Frank Branicki
spellingShingle Tahra AlMahmoud
M. Jawad Hashim
Margaret Ann Elzubeir
Frank Branicki
Ethics teaching in a medical education environment: preferences for diversity of learning and assessment methods
Medical Education Online
Medical ethics
professionalism
teaching and learning
author_facet Tahra AlMahmoud
M. Jawad Hashim
Margaret Ann Elzubeir
Frank Branicki
author_sort Tahra AlMahmoud
title Ethics teaching in a medical education environment: preferences for diversity of learning and assessment methods
title_short Ethics teaching in a medical education environment: preferences for diversity of learning and assessment methods
title_full Ethics teaching in a medical education environment: preferences for diversity of learning and assessment methods
title_fullStr Ethics teaching in a medical education environment: preferences for diversity of learning and assessment methods
title_full_unstemmed Ethics teaching in a medical education environment: preferences for diversity of learning and assessment methods
title_sort ethics teaching in a medical education environment: preferences for diversity of learning and assessment methods
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Medical Education Online
issn 1087-2981
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Background: Ethics and professionalism are an integral part of medical school curricula; however, medical students’ views on these topics have not been assessed in many countries. Objective: The study aimed to examine medical students’ perceptions toward ethics and professionalism teaching, and its learning and assessment methods. Design: A self-administered questionnaire eliciting views on professionalism and ethics education was distributed to a total of 128 final-year medical students. Results: A total of 108 students completed the survey, with an 84% response rate. Medical students reported frequently encountering ethical conflicts during training but stated only a moderate level of ethics training at medical school (mean = 5.14 ± 1.8). They noted that their education had helped somewhat to deal with ethical conflicts (mean = 5.39 ± 2.0). Students strongly affirmed the importance of ethics education (mean = 7.63 ± 1.03) and endorsed the value of positive role models (mean = 7.45 ± 1.5) as the preferred learning method. The cohort voiced interest in direct faculty supervision as an approach to assessment of knowledge and skills (mean = 7.62 ± 1.26). Female students perceived greater need for more ethics education compared to males (p = < 0.05). Students who claimed that they had experienced some unprofessional treatment had a more limited view of the importance of ethics as a subject (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Medical students viewed ethics education positively and preferred clinically attuned methods for learning.
topic Medical ethics
professionalism
teaching and learning
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2017.1328257
work_keys_str_mv AT tahraalmahmoud ethicsteachinginamedicaleducationenvironmentpreferencesfordiversityoflearningandassessmentmethods
AT mjawadhashim ethicsteachinginamedicaleducationenvironmentpreferencesfordiversityoflearningandassessmentmethods
AT margaretannelzubeir ethicsteachinginamedicaleducationenvironmentpreferencesfordiversityoflearningandassessmentmethods
AT frankbranicki ethicsteachinginamedicaleducationenvironmentpreferencesfordiversityoflearningandassessmentmethods
_version_ 1724883955911491584