Power and politics in research design and practice: Opening up space for social equity in interdisciplinary, multi-jurisdictional and community-based research

Working collaboratively with communities is commonly considered a cornerstone of good practice in research involving social-ecological concerns. Increasingly, funding agencies also recognise that such collaborations are most productive when community partners have some influence on the design and i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valoree Gagnon, Hugh Gorman, Emma Norman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UTS ePRESS 2017-06-01
Series:Gateways : International Journal of Community Research & Engagement
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/ijcre/article/view/5307
id doaj-85213c374d4c4c7ca75857774933a5b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-85213c374d4c4c7ca75857774933a5b32020-11-25T03:04:41ZengUTS ePRESSGateways : International Journal of Community Research & Engagement1836-33932017-06-011010.5130/ijcre.v10i1.53073331Power and politics in research design and practice: Opening up space for social equity in interdisciplinary, multi-jurisdictional and community-based researchValoree Gagnon0Hugh Gorman1Emma Norman2Michigan Technological UniversityMichigan Technological UniversityNorthwest Indian College Working collaboratively with communities is commonly considered a cornerstone of good practice in research involving social-ecological concerns. Increasingly, funding agencies also recognise that such collaborations are most productive when community partners have some influence on the design and implementation of the projects that benefit from their participation. However, researchers engaged with this work often struggle to actively engage community members in this way and, in particular, Indigenous peoples. In this article, we argue that useful strategies for facilitating such engagement are to leave space in the research plan for questions of interest to community partners and to encourage equitable interactions between all participants through the use of forums in which power dynamics are intentionally flattened. We demonstrate the use of this technique in an interdisciplinary, multi-jurisdictional research study involving the fate and transport of toxic compounds that lead to fish consumption advisories throughout the world. In this project, the use of participatory forums resulted in community partners in Michigan’s Keweenaw Bay area of Lake Superior shaping a key aspect of the research by raising the simple but significant question: ‘When can we eat the fish?’. Their interest in this question also helped to ensure that they would remain meaningful partners throughout the duration of the project. The conclusion emphasises that further integration of Indigenous and community-based research methods has the potential to significantly enhance the process and value of university-community research engagement in the future. https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/ijcre/article/view/5307university-community researchcommunity engagementparticipatory forumsIndigenous methodspower dynamicscounter-narratives
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Valoree Gagnon
Hugh Gorman
Emma Norman
spellingShingle Valoree Gagnon
Hugh Gorman
Emma Norman
Power and politics in research design and practice: Opening up space for social equity in interdisciplinary, multi-jurisdictional and community-based research
Gateways : International Journal of Community Research & Engagement
university-community research
community engagement
participatory forums
Indigenous methods
power dynamics
counter-narratives
author_facet Valoree Gagnon
Hugh Gorman
Emma Norman
author_sort Valoree Gagnon
title Power and politics in research design and practice: Opening up space for social equity in interdisciplinary, multi-jurisdictional and community-based research
title_short Power and politics in research design and practice: Opening up space for social equity in interdisciplinary, multi-jurisdictional and community-based research
title_full Power and politics in research design and practice: Opening up space for social equity in interdisciplinary, multi-jurisdictional and community-based research
title_fullStr Power and politics in research design and practice: Opening up space for social equity in interdisciplinary, multi-jurisdictional and community-based research
title_full_unstemmed Power and politics in research design and practice: Opening up space for social equity in interdisciplinary, multi-jurisdictional and community-based research
title_sort power and politics in research design and practice: opening up space for social equity in interdisciplinary, multi-jurisdictional and community-based research
publisher UTS ePRESS
series Gateways : International Journal of Community Research & Engagement
issn 1836-3393
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Working collaboratively with communities is commonly considered a cornerstone of good practice in research involving social-ecological concerns. Increasingly, funding agencies also recognise that such collaborations are most productive when community partners have some influence on the design and implementation of the projects that benefit from their participation. However, researchers engaged with this work often struggle to actively engage community members in this way and, in particular, Indigenous peoples. In this article, we argue that useful strategies for facilitating such engagement are to leave space in the research plan for questions of interest to community partners and to encourage equitable interactions between all participants through the use of forums in which power dynamics are intentionally flattened. We demonstrate the use of this technique in an interdisciplinary, multi-jurisdictional research study involving the fate and transport of toxic compounds that lead to fish consumption advisories throughout the world. In this project, the use of participatory forums resulted in community partners in Michigan’s Keweenaw Bay area of Lake Superior shaping a key aspect of the research by raising the simple but significant question: ‘When can we eat the fish?’. Their interest in this question also helped to ensure that they would remain meaningful partners throughout the duration of the project. The conclusion emphasises that further integration of Indigenous and community-based research methods has the potential to significantly enhance the process and value of university-community research engagement in the future.
topic university-community research
community engagement
participatory forums
Indigenous methods
power dynamics
counter-narratives
url https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/ijcre/article/view/5307
work_keys_str_mv AT valoreegagnon powerandpoliticsinresearchdesignandpracticeopeningupspaceforsocialequityininterdisciplinarymultijurisdictionalandcommunitybasedresearch
AT hughgorman powerandpoliticsinresearchdesignandpracticeopeningupspaceforsocialequityininterdisciplinarymultijurisdictionalandcommunitybasedresearch
AT emmanorman powerandpoliticsinresearchdesignandpracticeopeningupspaceforsocialequityininterdisciplinarymultijurisdictionalandcommunitybasedresearch
_version_ 1724680309770813440