Energetic underpinnings of yellow dung fly mating success in the field

Foraging provides the basis for animal reproduction, but requires energy and time to be sustained, entailing a trade-off. Whereas females should maximize their time foraging for resources, males should minimize their foraging time by optimizing time budgets to maximize their access t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wolf U. Blanckenhorn
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2021-07-01
Series:Alpine Entomology
Online Access:https://alpineentomology.pensoft.net/article/68153/download/pdf/
id doaj-851fc0e83e0b498da770571bcd6a0942
record_format Article
spelling doaj-851fc0e83e0b498da770571bcd6a09422021-09-28T14:32:54ZdeuPensoft PublishersAlpine Entomology 2535-08892021-07-015616710.3897/alpento.5.6815368153Energetic underpinnings of yellow dung fly mating success in the fieldWolf U. Blanckenhorn0University of Zurich Foraging provides the basis for animal reproduction, but requires energy and time to be sustained, entailing a trade-off. Whereas females should maximize their time foraging for resources, males should minimize their foraging time by optimizing time budgets to maximize their access to mating partners. Mark-resight field studies are difficult and hence uncommon for small insects. Yellow dung flies (Scathophaga stercoraria L.) abound on pastures in cold-temperate regions across the northern hemisphere. Adult flies lick nectar from flowers for energy, but require small insect prey to produce eggs and sperm. Males wait for females around fresh cow dung, but at one point also need to replenish their energy and/or sperm reserves in the surrounding vegetation. Their foraging time budgets should depend on their body size, nutritional energy reserves, availability of sperm, competitor and female density. Marked male dung flies whose nutritional status was experimentally manipulated – water only (null control); water + sugar (energy replenishment); or water, sugar + Drosophila prey (energy and sperm replenishment) – were repeatedly observed on an experimental pasture for an entire day. Both nutrient types were expected to increase the mating success of especially large males. The total number of resighted males seen copulating was lowest for water-treated flies. Mating success was positively related to body size. The distance travelled between dung pats was greater for males fed sugar or prey and also increased with body size, while pat residence times decreased with size. No differences were found between the sugar- and prey-fed groups. Crucially however, there was no evidence in the field for a time budget or mating advantage of small males when nutrients were limited. https://alpineentomology.pensoft.net/article/68153/download/pdf/
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wolf U. Blanckenhorn
spellingShingle Wolf U. Blanckenhorn
Energetic underpinnings of yellow dung fly mating success in the field
Alpine Entomology
author_facet Wolf U. Blanckenhorn
author_sort Wolf U. Blanckenhorn
title Energetic underpinnings of yellow dung fly mating success in the field
title_short Energetic underpinnings of yellow dung fly mating success in the field
title_full Energetic underpinnings of yellow dung fly mating success in the field
title_fullStr Energetic underpinnings of yellow dung fly mating success in the field
title_full_unstemmed Energetic underpinnings of yellow dung fly mating success in the field
title_sort energetic underpinnings of yellow dung fly mating success in the field
publisher Pensoft Publishers
series Alpine Entomology
issn 2535-0889
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Foraging provides the basis for animal reproduction, but requires energy and time to be sustained, entailing a trade-off. Whereas females should maximize their time foraging for resources, males should minimize their foraging time by optimizing time budgets to maximize their access to mating partners. Mark-resight field studies are difficult and hence uncommon for small insects. Yellow dung flies (Scathophaga stercoraria L.) abound on pastures in cold-temperate regions across the northern hemisphere. Adult flies lick nectar from flowers for energy, but require small insect prey to produce eggs and sperm. Males wait for females around fresh cow dung, but at one point also need to replenish their energy and/or sperm reserves in the surrounding vegetation. Their foraging time budgets should depend on their body size, nutritional energy reserves, availability of sperm, competitor and female density. Marked male dung flies whose nutritional status was experimentally manipulated – water only (null control); water + sugar (energy replenishment); or water, sugar + Drosophila prey (energy and sperm replenishment) – were repeatedly observed on an experimental pasture for an entire day. Both nutrient types were expected to increase the mating success of especially large males. The total number of resighted males seen copulating was lowest for water-treated flies. Mating success was positively related to body size. The distance travelled between dung pats was greater for males fed sugar or prey and also increased with body size, while pat residence times decreased with size. No differences were found between the sugar- and prey-fed groups. Crucially however, there was no evidence in the field for a time budget or mating advantage of small males when nutrients were limited.
url https://alpineentomology.pensoft.net/article/68153/download/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT wolfublanckenhorn energeticunderpinningsofyellowdungflymatingsuccessinthefield
_version_ 1716865647631138816