Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening

The clinical effectiveness of screening is highly dependent on uptake. Previous randomised controlled trials suggest that non-participant reminders, which highlight the opportunity to re-book an appointment, can improve participation. The present analysis examines the impact of implementing these re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R.S. Kerrison, A. Prentice, S. Marshall, S. Choglay, S. Stoffel, C. Rees, C. von Wagner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-03-01
Series:Preventive Medicine Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335520302667
id doaj-851b3b6df4304bc094337c66f5a8483b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-851b3b6df4304bc094337c66f5a8483b2021-02-21T04:32:59ZengElsevierPreventive Medicine Reports2211-33552021-03-0121101308Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screeningR.S. Kerrison0A. Prentice1S. Marshall2S. Choglay3S. Stoffel4C. Rees5C. von Wagner6Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom; Corresponding author at: Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom.St Mark’s Bowel Cancer Screening Centre, St Mark’s Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, United KingdomSt Mark’s Bowel Cancer Screening Centre, St Mark’s Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, United KingdomPublic Health England, Skipton House, London SE1 6LH, United KingdomResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom; Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 61, 4056 Basel, SwitzerlandPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust, South Shields, United KingdomResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, United KingdomThe clinical effectiveness of screening is highly dependent on uptake. Previous randomised controlled trials suggest that non-participant reminders, which highlight the opportunity to re-book an appointment, can improve participation. The present analysis examines the impact of implementing these reminders within the English Flexible Sigmoidoscopy (FS) Screening Programme, which offers once-only FS screening to adults aged 55–59 years.We assessed the screening status of 26,339 individuals invited for once-only FS screening in England. A total of 10,952 (41.6%) had attended screening, and were subsequently ineligible. The remaining 15,387 had not attended screening, and were selected to receive a reminder, 1–2 years after their invitation. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the increase in uptake and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) of those who self-referred, six months after the delivery of the final reminder. Pearson’s Chi-Square was used to compare the ADR between those who attended when invited and those who self-referred.Of the 15,387 adults eligible to receive a reminder, 13,626 (88.6%) were sent a reminder as intended (1,761 were not sent a reminder, due to endoscopy capacity). Of these, 8.0% (n = 1,086) booked and attended an appointment, which equated to a 4.1% increase in uptake from 41.6% at baseline, to 45.7% at follow-up. The ADR was significantly higher for those who self-referred, compared with those who attended when invited (13.3% and 9.5%, respectively; X2 = 16.138, p = 0.000059).The implementation of non-participant reminders led to a moderate increase in uptake. Implementing non-participant reminders could help mitigate the negative effects of COVID-19 on uptake.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335520302667Flexible sigmoidoscopy screeningColorectal cancer screeningBowel scope screeningRemindersUptake
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R.S. Kerrison
A. Prentice
S. Marshall
S. Choglay
S. Stoffel
C. Rees
C. von Wagner
spellingShingle R.S. Kerrison
A. Prentice
S. Marshall
S. Choglay
S. Stoffel
C. Rees
C. von Wagner
Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
Preventive Medicine Reports
Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
Colorectal cancer screening
Bowel scope screening
Reminders
Uptake
author_facet R.S. Kerrison
A. Prentice
S. Marshall
S. Choglay
S. Stoffel
C. Rees
C. von Wagner
author_sort R.S. Kerrison
title Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
title_short Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
title_full Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
title_fullStr Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
title_sort implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
publisher Elsevier
series Preventive Medicine Reports
issn 2211-3355
publishDate 2021-03-01
description The clinical effectiveness of screening is highly dependent on uptake. Previous randomised controlled trials suggest that non-participant reminders, which highlight the opportunity to re-book an appointment, can improve participation. The present analysis examines the impact of implementing these reminders within the English Flexible Sigmoidoscopy (FS) Screening Programme, which offers once-only FS screening to adults aged 55–59 years.We assessed the screening status of 26,339 individuals invited for once-only FS screening in England. A total of 10,952 (41.6%) had attended screening, and were subsequently ineligible. The remaining 15,387 had not attended screening, and were selected to receive a reminder, 1–2 years after their invitation. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the increase in uptake and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) of those who self-referred, six months after the delivery of the final reminder. Pearson’s Chi-Square was used to compare the ADR between those who attended when invited and those who self-referred.Of the 15,387 adults eligible to receive a reminder, 13,626 (88.6%) were sent a reminder as intended (1,761 were not sent a reminder, due to endoscopy capacity). Of these, 8.0% (n = 1,086) booked and attended an appointment, which equated to a 4.1% increase in uptake from 41.6% at baseline, to 45.7% at follow-up. The ADR was significantly higher for those who self-referred, compared with those who attended when invited (13.3% and 9.5%, respectively; X2 = 16.138, p = 0.000059).The implementation of non-participant reminders led to a moderate increase in uptake. Implementing non-participant reminders could help mitigate the negative effects of COVID-19 on uptake.
topic Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
Colorectal cancer screening
Bowel scope screening
Reminders
Uptake
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335520302667
work_keys_str_mv AT rskerrison implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening
AT aprentice implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening
AT smarshall implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening
AT schoglay implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening
AT sstoffel implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening
AT crees implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening
AT cvonwagner implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening
_version_ 1724258765767704576