Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011.

<p>Opposition to Steen Busck’s Doctoral Thesis A Rural Community Breaking Up. Tradition and Modernization in Sundby Parish on the Island of Mors during the Period 1660-1800, vol. 1-2, Aarhus, 2011.</p><p>A central feature of Steen Busck’s dissertation is the concept of a “tradition...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Dansk Historisk Fællesråd & Foreningen Danmarks Folkeminder 2012-05-01
Series:Kulturstudier
Online Access:http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/fn/article/view/6314
id doaj-8519e65de58e47b79517b04d0c529790
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8519e65de58e47b79517b04d0c5297902020-11-24T20:56:01ZdanDansk Historisk Fællesråd & Foreningen Danmarks FolkeminderKulturstudier1904-53522012-05-01315585Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011.Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen<p>Opposition to Steen Busck’s Doctoral Thesis A Rural Community Breaking Up. Tradition and Modernization in Sundby Parish on the Island of Mors during the Period 1660-1800, vol. 1-2, Aarhus, 2011.</p><p>A central feature of Steen Busck’s dissertation is the concept of a “traditional” rural community, which not until late in the period embarks seriously on a “modernization”, which to the author is synonymous with the introduction of capitalism. The present opposition will discuss this theory, taking as its point of departure a number of concrete manifestations of it in Steen  Busck’s book. The emphasis is on the economic side, which also, when all is said and done, is the mainstay of Busck’s theory.</p><p><br />Steen Busck attempts to demonstrate that the economy was relatively stagnant and oriented towards self-sufficiency, and that the market economy only penetrated slowly. The opposition discusses various indications of how agriculture developed during the period, and it is argued that there was a larger degree of development than is assumed by Busck. Simultaneously, the balance between self-sufficiency and market economy is discussed, including some of the farmers’ budgets that Busck has constructed. The opponent argues that production was fairly evenly organized for self-sufficiency and for the market, and he draws attention to the enterprising cattle-dealers who have been found by Steen Busck but to whom he ascribes no decisive importance.</p><p><br />The last part of the opposition deals with the relationship between the landed estates, the property market and the power of the state. Here it is argued that Sundby was an atypical parish as far as the estate structure was concerned, since it was dominated by scattered farms which frequently changed hands, being sold from one landed estate to another. This implies that Steen Busck’s theory of the property market helping to destroy the estate as an institution and paving the way for agricultural reforms and modernization may hold true for Sundby; but it is probably not representative on a national level.</p>http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/fn/article/view/6314
collection DOAJ
language Danish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen
spellingShingle Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen
Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011.
Kulturstudier
author_facet Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen
author_sort Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen
title Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011.
title_short Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011.
title_full Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011.
title_fullStr Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011.
title_full_unstemmed Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011.
title_sort sundby mors mellem dynamik og tradition. opposition mod steen buscks disputats et landbosamfund i opbrud. sundby mors 1660-1800, 2011.
publisher Dansk Historisk Fællesråd & Foreningen Danmarks Folkeminder
series Kulturstudier
issn 1904-5352
publishDate 2012-05-01
description <p>Opposition to Steen Busck’s Doctoral Thesis A Rural Community Breaking Up. Tradition and Modernization in Sundby Parish on the Island of Mors during the Period 1660-1800, vol. 1-2, Aarhus, 2011.</p><p>A central feature of Steen Busck’s dissertation is the concept of a “traditional” rural community, which not until late in the period embarks seriously on a “modernization”, which to the author is synonymous with the introduction of capitalism. The present opposition will discuss this theory, taking as its point of departure a number of concrete manifestations of it in Steen  Busck’s book. The emphasis is on the economic side, which also, when all is said and done, is the mainstay of Busck’s theory.</p><p><br />Steen Busck attempts to demonstrate that the economy was relatively stagnant and oriented towards self-sufficiency, and that the market economy only penetrated slowly. The opposition discusses various indications of how agriculture developed during the period, and it is argued that there was a larger degree of development than is assumed by Busck. Simultaneously, the balance between self-sufficiency and market economy is discussed, including some of the farmers’ budgets that Busck has constructed. The opponent argues that production was fairly evenly organized for self-sufficiency and for the market, and he draws attention to the enterprising cattle-dealers who have been found by Steen Busck but to whom he ascribes no decisive importance.</p><p><br />The last part of the opposition deals with the relationship between the landed estates, the property market and the power of the state. Here it is argued that Sundby was an atypical parish as far as the estate structure was concerned, since it was dominated by scattered farms which frequently changed hands, being sold from one landed estate to another. This implies that Steen Busck’s theory of the property market helping to destroy the estate as an institution and paving the way for agricultural reforms and modernization may hold true for Sundby; but it is probably not representative on a national level.</p>
url http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/fn/article/view/6314
work_keys_str_mv AT carstenporskrograsmussen sundbymorsmellemdynamikogtraditionoppositionmodsteenbuscksdisputatsetlandbosamfundiopbrudsundbymors166018002011
_version_ 1716791067212251136