Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011.
<p>Opposition to Steen Busck’s Doctoral Thesis A Rural Community Breaking Up. Tradition and Modernization in Sundby Parish on the Island of Mors during the Period 1660-1800, vol. 1-2, Aarhus, 2011.</p><p>A central feature of Steen Busck’s dissertation is the concept of a “tradition...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Danish |
Published: |
Dansk Historisk Fællesråd & Foreningen Danmarks Folkeminder
2012-05-01
|
Series: | Kulturstudier |
Online Access: | http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/fn/article/view/6314 |
id |
doaj-8519e65de58e47b79517b04d0c529790 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8519e65de58e47b79517b04d0c5297902020-11-24T20:56:01ZdanDansk Historisk Fællesråd & Foreningen Danmarks FolkeminderKulturstudier1904-53522012-05-01315585Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011.Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen<p>Opposition to Steen Busck’s Doctoral Thesis A Rural Community Breaking Up. Tradition and Modernization in Sundby Parish on the Island of Mors during the Period 1660-1800, vol. 1-2, Aarhus, 2011.</p><p>A central feature of Steen Busck’s dissertation is the concept of a “traditional” rural community, which not until late in the period embarks seriously on a “modernization”, which to the author is synonymous with the introduction of capitalism. The present opposition will discuss this theory, taking as its point of departure a number of concrete manifestations of it in Steen Busck’s book. The emphasis is on the economic side, which also, when all is said and done, is the mainstay of Busck’s theory.</p><p><br />Steen Busck attempts to demonstrate that the economy was relatively stagnant and oriented towards self-sufficiency, and that the market economy only penetrated slowly. The opposition discusses various indications of how agriculture developed during the period, and it is argued that there was a larger degree of development than is assumed by Busck. Simultaneously, the balance between self-sufficiency and market economy is discussed, including some of the farmers’ budgets that Busck has constructed. The opponent argues that production was fairly evenly organized for self-sufficiency and for the market, and he draws attention to the enterprising cattle-dealers who have been found by Steen Busck but to whom he ascribes no decisive importance.</p><p><br />The last part of the opposition deals with the relationship between the landed estates, the property market and the power of the state. Here it is argued that Sundby was an atypical parish as far as the estate structure was concerned, since it was dominated by scattered farms which frequently changed hands, being sold from one landed estate to another. This implies that Steen Busck’s theory of the property market helping to destroy the estate as an institution and paving the way for agricultural reforms and modernization may hold true for Sundby; but it is probably not representative on a national level.</p>http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/fn/article/view/6314 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Danish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen |
spellingShingle |
Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011. Kulturstudier |
author_facet |
Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen |
author_sort |
Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen |
title |
Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011. |
title_short |
Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011. |
title_full |
Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011. |
title_fullStr |
Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sundby Mors mellem dynamik og tradition. Opposition mod Steen Buscks disputats Et landbosamfund i opbrud. Sundby Mors 1660-1800, 2011. |
title_sort |
sundby mors mellem dynamik og tradition. opposition mod steen buscks disputats et landbosamfund i opbrud. sundby mors 1660-1800, 2011. |
publisher |
Dansk Historisk Fællesråd & Foreningen Danmarks Folkeminder |
series |
Kulturstudier |
issn |
1904-5352 |
publishDate |
2012-05-01 |
description |
<p>Opposition to Steen Busck’s Doctoral Thesis A Rural Community Breaking Up. Tradition and Modernization in Sundby Parish on the Island of Mors during the Period 1660-1800, vol. 1-2, Aarhus, 2011.</p><p>A central feature of Steen Busck’s dissertation is the concept of a “traditional” rural community, which not until late in the period embarks seriously on a “modernization”, which to the author is synonymous with the introduction of capitalism. The present opposition will discuss this theory, taking as its point of departure a number of concrete manifestations of it in Steen Busck’s book. The emphasis is on the economic side, which also, when all is said and done, is the mainstay of Busck’s theory.</p><p><br />Steen Busck attempts to demonstrate that the economy was relatively stagnant and oriented towards self-sufficiency, and that the market economy only penetrated slowly. The opposition discusses various indications of how agriculture developed during the period, and it is argued that there was a larger degree of development than is assumed by Busck. Simultaneously, the balance between self-sufficiency and market economy is discussed, including some of the farmers’ budgets that Busck has constructed. The opponent argues that production was fairly evenly organized for self-sufficiency and for the market, and he draws attention to the enterprising cattle-dealers who have been found by Steen Busck but to whom he ascribes no decisive importance.</p><p><br />The last part of the opposition deals with the relationship between the landed estates, the property market and the power of the state. Here it is argued that Sundby was an atypical parish as far as the estate structure was concerned, since it was dominated by scattered farms which frequently changed hands, being sold from one landed estate to another. This implies that Steen Busck’s theory of the property market helping to destroy the estate as an institution and paving the way for agricultural reforms and modernization may hold true for Sundby; but it is probably not representative on a national level.</p> |
url |
http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/fn/article/view/6314 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carstenporskrograsmussen sundbymorsmellemdynamikogtraditionoppositionmodsteenbuscksdisputatsetlandbosamfundiopbrudsundbymors166018002011 |
_version_ |
1716791067212251136 |