Determinants of Capital Structure: A Quantile Regression Analysis

In this study, we attempted to analyze the determinants of capital structure for Indian firms using a panel framework and to investigate whether the capital structure models derived from Western settings provide convincing explanations for capital structure decisions of the Indian firms. The investi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aviral Kumar Tiwari, Raveesh Krishnankutty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2015-04-01
Series:Studies in Business and Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/sbe-2015-0002
id doaj-851754d2d8904481be885d06e117b87d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-851754d2d8904481be885d06e117b87d2021-09-05T14:00:24ZengSciendoStudies in Business and Economics2344-54162015-04-01101163410.1515/sbe-2015-0002sbe-2015-0002Determinants of Capital Structure: A Quantile Regression AnalysisAviral Kumar Tiwari0Raveesh Krishnankutty1Faculty of Management, IFHE University, IBS Hyderabad, IndiaFaculty of Management, IFHE University, IBS Hyderabad, IndiaIn this study, we attempted to analyze the determinants of capital structure for Indian firms using a panel framework and to investigate whether the capital structure models derived from Western settings provide convincing explanations for capital structure decisions of the Indian firms. The investigation is performed using balanced panel data procedures for a sample 298 firms (from the BSE 500 firms based on the availability of data) during 2001-2010. We found that for lowest quantile LnSales and TANGIT are significant with positive sign and NDTS and PROFIT are significant with negative sign. However, in case of 0.25th quantile LnSales and LnTA are significant with positive sign and PROFIT is significant with negative sign. For median quantile PROFIT is found to be significant with negative sign and TANGIT is significant with positive sign. For 0.75th quantile, in model one, LnSales and PROFIT are significant with negative sign and TANGIT and GROWTHTA are significant with positive sign whereas, in model two, results of 0.75th quantile are similar to the median quantile of model two. For the highest quantile, in case of model one, results are similar to the case of 0.75th quantile with exception that now GROWTHTA in model one (and GROWTHSA in model two).https://doi.org/10.1515/sbe-2015-0002determinants of capital structurequantile regressionfixed and random effect models
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aviral Kumar Tiwari
Raveesh Krishnankutty
spellingShingle Aviral Kumar Tiwari
Raveesh Krishnankutty
Determinants of Capital Structure: A Quantile Regression Analysis
Studies in Business and Economics
determinants of capital structure
quantile regression
fixed and random effect models
author_facet Aviral Kumar Tiwari
Raveesh Krishnankutty
author_sort Aviral Kumar Tiwari
title Determinants of Capital Structure: A Quantile Regression Analysis
title_short Determinants of Capital Structure: A Quantile Regression Analysis
title_full Determinants of Capital Structure: A Quantile Regression Analysis
title_fullStr Determinants of Capital Structure: A Quantile Regression Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of Capital Structure: A Quantile Regression Analysis
title_sort determinants of capital structure: a quantile regression analysis
publisher Sciendo
series Studies in Business and Economics
issn 2344-5416
publishDate 2015-04-01
description In this study, we attempted to analyze the determinants of capital structure for Indian firms using a panel framework and to investigate whether the capital structure models derived from Western settings provide convincing explanations for capital structure decisions of the Indian firms. The investigation is performed using balanced panel data procedures for a sample 298 firms (from the BSE 500 firms based on the availability of data) during 2001-2010. We found that for lowest quantile LnSales and TANGIT are significant with positive sign and NDTS and PROFIT are significant with negative sign. However, in case of 0.25th quantile LnSales and LnTA are significant with positive sign and PROFIT is significant with negative sign. For median quantile PROFIT is found to be significant with negative sign and TANGIT is significant with positive sign. For 0.75th quantile, in model one, LnSales and PROFIT are significant with negative sign and TANGIT and GROWTHTA are significant with positive sign whereas, in model two, results of 0.75th quantile are similar to the median quantile of model two. For the highest quantile, in case of model one, results are similar to the case of 0.75th quantile with exception that now GROWTHTA in model one (and GROWTHSA in model two).
topic determinants of capital structure
quantile regression
fixed and random effect models
url https://doi.org/10.1515/sbe-2015-0002
work_keys_str_mv AT aviralkumartiwari determinantsofcapitalstructureaquantileregressionanalysis
AT raveeshkrishnankutty determinantsofcapitalstructureaquantileregressionanalysis
_version_ 1717811997571022848