Can Local Ecological Knowledge Contribute to Wildlife Management? Case Studies of Migratory Birds

Sound management of wildlife species, particularly those that are harvested, requires extensive information on their natural history and demography. For many global wildlife populations, however, insufficient scientific information exists, and alternative data sources may need to be considered in ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grant Gilchrist, Mark Mallory, Flemming Merkel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2005-06-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
LEK
TEK
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art20/
id doaj-850a822fbcea44a4bc5bbc941e29f9a0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-850a822fbcea44a4bc5bbc941e29f9a02020-11-24T22:56:16ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872005-06-011012010.5751/ES-01275-1001201275Can Local Ecological Knowledge Contribute to Wildlife Management? Case Studies of Migratory BirdsGrant GilchristMark MalloryFlemming MerkelSound management of wildlife species, particularly those that are harvested, requires extensive information on their natural history and demography. For many global wildlife populations, however, insufficient scientific information exists, and alternative data sources may need to be considered in management decisions. In some circumstances, local ecological knowledge (LEK) can serve as a useful, complementary data source, and may be particularly valuable when managing wildlife populations that occur in remote locations inhabited by indigenous peoples. Although several published papers discuss the general benefits of LEK, few attempt to examine the reliability of information generated through this approach. We review four case studies of marine birds in which we gathered LEK for each species and then compared this information to empirical data derived from independent scientific studies of the same populations. We then discuss how we attempted to integrate LEK into our own conservation and management efforts of these bird species with variable success. Although LEK proved to be a useful source of information for three of four species, we conclude that management decisions based primarily on LEK, in the absence of scientific scrutiny, should be treated with caution.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art20/ArcticInuitLEKlocal ecological knowledgemarine birdspopulation declinesTEKtraditional ecological knowledge
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Grant Gilchrist
Mark Mallory
Flemming Merkel
spellingShingle Grant Gilchrist
Mark Mallory
Flemming Merkel
Can Local Ecological Knowledge Contribute to Wildlife Management? Case Studies of Migratory Birds
Ecology and Society
Arctic
Inuit
LEK
local ecological knowledge
marine birds
population declines
TEK
traditional ecological knowledge
author_facet Grant Gilchrist
Mark Mallory
Flemming Merkel
author_sort Grant Gilchrist
title Can Local Ecological Knowledge Contribute to Wildlife Management? Case Studies of Migratory Birds
title_short Can Local Ecological Knowledge Contribute to Wildlife Management? Case Studies of Migratory Birds
title_full Can Local Ecological Knowledge Contribute to Wildlife Management? Case Studies of Migratory Birds
title_fullStr Can Local Ecological Knowledge Contribute to Wildlife Management? Case Studies of Migratory Birds
title_full_unstemmed Can Local Ecological Knowledge Contribute to Wildlife Management? Case Studies of Migratory Birds
title_sort can local ecological knowledge contribute to wildlife management? case studies of migratory birds
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2005-06-01
description Sound management of wildlife species, particularly those that are harvested, requires extensive information on their natural history and demography. For many global wildlife populations, however, insufficient scientific information exists, and alternative data sources may need to be considered in management decisions. In some circumstances, local ecological knowledge (LEK) can serve as a useful, complementary data source, and may be particularly valuable when managing wildlife populations that occur in remote locations inhabited by indigenous peoples. Although several published papers discuss the general benefits of LEK, few attempt to examine the reliability of information generated through this approach. We review four case studies of marine birds in which we gathered LEK for each species and then compared this information to empirical data derived from independent scientific studies of the same populations. We then discuss how we attempted to integrate LEK into our own conservation and management efforts of these bird species with variable success. Although LEK proved to be a useful source of information for three of four species, we conclude that management decisions based primarily on LEK, in the absence of scientific scrutiny, should be treated with caution.
topic Arctic
Inuit
LEK
local ecological knowledge
marine birds
population declines
TEK
traditional ecological knowledge
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art20/
work_keys_str_mv AT grantgilchrist canlocalecologicalknowledgecontributetowildlifemanagementcasestudiesofmigratorybirds
AT markmallory canlocalecologicalknowledgecontributetowildlifemanagementcasestudiesofmigratorybirds
AT flemmingmerkel canlocalecologicalknowledgecontributetowildlifemanagementcasestudiesofmigratorybirds
_version_ 1716390510171521024