The periglacial engine of mountain erosion – Part 1: Rates of frost cracking and frost creep

With accelerating climate cooling in the late Cenozoic, glacial and periglacial erosion became more widespread on the surface of the Earth. The resultant shift in erosion patterns significantly changed the large-scale morphology of many mountain ranges worldwide. Whereas the glacial fingerpr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. L. Andersen, D. L. Egholm, M. F. Knudsen, J. D. Jansen, S. B. Nielsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-10-01
Series:Earth Surface Dynamics
Online Access:http://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/3/447/2015/esurf-3-447-2015.pdf
id doaj-84f320210ba841ca9936dd69fbca4fb2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-84f320210ba841ca9936dd69fbca4fb22020-11-24T20:59:13ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth Surface Dynamics2196-63112196-632X2015-10-013444746210.5194/esurf-3-447-2015The periglacial engine of mountain erosion – Part 1: Rates of frost cracking and frost creepJ. L. Andersen0D. L. Egholm1M. F. Knudsen2J. D. Jansen3S. B. Nielsen4Department of Geoscience, Aarhus University, Høegh-Guldbergs Gade 2, 8000 Aarhus C, DenmarkDepartment of Geoscience, Aarhus University, Høegh-Guldbergs Gade 2, 8000 Aarhus C, DenmarkDepartment of Geoscience, Aarhus University, Høegh-Guldbergs Gade 2, 8000 Aarhus C, DenmarkInstitute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, GermanyDepartment of Geoscience, Aarhus University, Høegh-Guldbergs Gade 2, 8000 Aarhus C, DenmarkWith accelerating climate cooling in the late Cenozoic, glacial and periglacial erosion became more widespread on the surface of the Earth. The resultant shift in erosion patterns significantly changed the large-scale morphology of many mountain ranges worldwide. Whereas the glacial fingerprint is easily distinguished by its characteristic fjords and U-shaped valleys, the periglacial fingerprint is more subtle but potentially prevails in some mid- to high-latitude landscapes. Previous models have advocated a frost-driven control on debris production at steep headwalls and glacial valley sides. Here we investigate the important role that periglacial processes also play in less steep parts of mountain landscapes. Understanding the influences of frost-driven processes in low-relief areas requires a focus on the consequences of an accreting soil mantle, which characterises such surfaces. We present a new model that quantifies two key physical processes: frost cracking and frost creep, as a function of both temperature and sediment thickness. Our results yield new insights into how climate and sediment transport properties combine to scale the intensity of periglacial processes. The thickness of the soil mantle strongly modulates the relation between climate and the intensity of mechanical weathering and sediment flux. Our results also point to an offset between the conditions that promote frost cracking and those that promote frost creep, indicating that a stable climate can provide optimal conditions for only one of those processes at a time. Finally, quantifying these relations also opens up the possibility of including periglacial processes in large-scale, long-term landscape evolution models, as demonstrated in a companion paper.http://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/3/447/2015/esurf-3-447-2015.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. L. Andersen
D. L. Egholm
M. F. Knudsen
J. D. Jansen
S. B. Nielsen
spellingShingle J. L. Andersen
D. L. Egholm
M. F. Knudsen
J. D. Jansen
S. B. Nielsen
The periglacial engine of mountain erosion – Part 1: Rates of frost cracking and frost creep
Earth Surface Dynamics
author_facet J. L. Andersen
D. L. Egholm
M. F. Knudsen
J. D. Jansen
S. B. Nielsen
author_sort J. L. Andersen
title The periglacial engine of mountain erosion – Part 1: Rates of frost cracking and frost creep
title_short The periglacial engine of mountain erosion – Part 1: Rates of frost cracking and frost creep
title_full The periglacial engine of mountain erosion – Part 1: Rates of frost cracking and frost creep
title_fullStr The periglacial engine of mountain erosion – Part 1: Rates of frost cracking and frost creep
title_full_unstemmed The periglacial engine of mountain erosion – Part 1: Rates of frost cracking and frost creep
title_sort periglacial engine of mountain erosion – part 1: rates of frost cracking and frost creep
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Earth Surface Dynamics
issn 2196-6311
2196-632X
publishDate 2015-10-01
description With accelerating climate cooling in the late Cenozoic, glacial and periglacial erosion became more widespread on the surface of the Earth. The resultant shift in erosion patterns significantly changed the large-scale morphology of many mountain ranges worldwide. Whereas the glacial fingerprint is easily distinguished by its characteristic fjords and U-shaped valleys, the periglacial fingerprint is more subtle but potentially prevails in some mid- to high-latitude landscapes. Previous models have advocated a frost-driven control on debris production at steep headwalls and glacial valley sides. Here we investigate the important role that periglacial processes also play in less steep parts of mountain landscapes. Understanding the influences of frost-driven processes in low-relief areas requires a focus on the consequences of an accreting soil mantle, which characterises such surfaces. We present a new model that quantifies two key physical processes: frost cracking and frost creep, as a function of both temperature and sediment thickness. Our results yield new insights into how climate and sediment transport properties combine to scale the intensity of periglacial processes. The thickness of the soil mantle strongly modulates the relation between climate and the intensity of mechanical weathering and sediment flux. Our results also point to an offset between the conditions that promote frost cracking and those that promote frost creep, indicating that a stable climate can provide optimal conditions for only one of those processes at a time. Finally, quantifying these relations also opens up the possibility of including periglacial processes in large-scale, long-term landscape evolution models, as demonstrated in a companion paper.
url http://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/3/447/2015/esurf-3-447-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jlandersen theperiglacialengineofmountainerosionndashpart1ratesoffrostcrackingandfrostcreep
AT dlegholm theperiglacialengineofmountainerosionndashpart1ratesoffrostcrackingandfrostcreep
AT mfknudsen theperiglacialengineofmountainerosionndashpart1ratesoffrostcrackingandfrostcreep
AT jdjansen theperiglacialengineofmountainerosionndashpart1ratesoffrostcrackingandfrostcreep
AT sbnielsen theperiglacialengineofmountainerosionndashpart1ratesoffrostcrackingandfrostcreep
AT jlandersen periglacialengineofmountainerosionndashpart1ratesoffrostcrackingandfrostcreep
AT dlegholm periglacialengineofmountainerosionndashpart1ratesoffrostcrackingandfrostcreep
AT mfknudsen periglacialengineofmountainerosionndashpart1ratesoffrostcrackingandfrostcreep
AT jdjansen periglacialengineofmountainerosionndashpart1ratesoffrostcrackingandfrostcreep
AT sbnielsen periglacialengineofmountainerosionndashpart1ratesoffrostcrackingandfrostcreep
_version_ 1716783266124529665