Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean Sections
Objective. To evaluate the safety of electrocautery for coagulation during Caesarean sections. Study Design. A randomized, controlled, clinical pilot study was performed at a university maternity hospital. After admission for delivery and decision to perform a C-section, volunteers were randomized t...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2014-01-01
|
Series: | The Scientific World Journal |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/602375 |
id |
doaj-84e5e54b22194686bc68321c282ece15 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-84e5e54b22194686bc68321c282ece152020-11-25T00:25:40ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/602375602375Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean SectionsCristiane M. Moreira0Eliana Amaral1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (PUCCAMP), Avenida Jonh Boind Dunlop s/n, 13100 Campinas, SP, BrazilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (UNICAMP), Rua Alexander Fleming, 101 Cidade Universitária, 13083-881 Campinas, SP, BrazilObjective. To evaluate the safety of electrocautery for coagulation during Caesarean sections. Study Design. A randomized, controlled, clinical pilot study was performed at a university maternity hospital. After admission for delivery and decision to perform a C-section, volunteers were randomized to either the intervention group (use of electrocautery for coagulation) or nonintervention group. The women were examined at the time of postpartum discharge (day 3), at days 7 to 10, and again at days 30 to 40 for signs of infection, hematoma, seroma, or dehiscence. Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat analysis, and risk ratios were calculated. Results. No significant differences were found between the two groups. Only 2.8% of patients in the intervention group developed surgical wound complications during hospitalization. However, 7 to 10 days following discharge, these rates reached 23.0% and 15.4% in the intervention and nonintervention groups, respectively (RR = 1.50, 95% CI = 0.84–2.60). Conclusion. Further studies should confirm whether the use of electrocautery for coagulation does not increase the risk of surgical wound complications in patients undergoing Caesarean sections.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/602375 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cristiane M. Moreira Eliana Amaral |
spellingShingle |
Cristiane M. Moreira Eliana Amaral Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean Sections The Scientific World Journal |
author_facet |
Cristiane M. Moreira Eliana Amaral |
author_sort |
Cristiane M. Moreira |
title |
Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean Sections |
title_short |
Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean Sections |
title_full |
Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean Sections |
title_fullStr |
Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean Sections |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean Sections |
title_sort |
use of electrocautery for coagulation and wound complications in caesarean sections |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
The Scientific World Journal |
issn |
2356-6140 1537-744X |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
Objective. To evaluate the safety of electrocautery for coagulation during Caesarean sections. Study Design. A randomized, controlled, clinical pilot study was performed at a university maternity hospital. After admission for delivery and decision to perform a C-section, volunteers were randomized to either the intervention group (use of electrocautery for coagulation) or nonintervention group. The women were examined at the time of postpartum discharge (day 3), at days 7 to 10, and again at days 30 to 40 for signs of infection, hematoma, seroma, or dehiscence. Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat analysis, and risk ratios were calculated. Results. No significant differences were found between the two groups. Only 2.8% of patients in the intervention group developed surgical wound complications during hospitalization. However, 7 to 10 days following discharge, these rates reached 23.0% and 15.4% in the intervention and nonintervention groups, respectively (RR = 1.50, 95% CI = 0.84–2.60). Conclusion. Further studies should confirm whether the use of electrocautery for coagulation does not increase the risk of surgical wound complications in patients undergoing Caesarean sections. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/602375 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cristianemmoreira useofelectrocauteryforcoagulationandwoundcomplicationsincaesareansections AT elianaamaral useofelectrocauteryforcoagulationandwoundcomplicationsincaesareansections |
_version_ |
1725347662451965952 |