Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean Sections

Objective. To evaluate the safety of electrocautery for coagulation during Caesarean sections. Study Design. A randomized, controlled, clinical pilot study was performed at a university maternity hospital. After admission for delivery and decision to perform a C-section, volunteers were randomized t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cristiane M. Moreira, Eliana Amaral
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/602375
id doaj-84e5e54b22194686bc68321c282ece15
record_format Article
spelling doaj-84e5e54b22194686bc68321c282ece152020-11-25T00:25:40ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/602375602375Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean SectionsCristiane M. Moreira0Eliana Amaral1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (PUCCAMP), Avenida Jonh Boind Dunlop s/n, 13100 Campinas, SP, BrazilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (UNICAMP), Rua Alexander Fleming, 101 Cidade Universitária, 13083-881 Campinas, SP, BrazilObjective. To evaluate the safety of electrocautery for coagulation during Caesarean sections. Study Design. A randomized, controlled, clinical pilot study was performed at a university maternity hospital. After admission for delivery and decision to perform a C-section, volunteers were randomized to either the intervention group (use of electrocautery for coagulation) or nonintervention group. The women were examined at the time of postpartum discharge (day 3), at days 7 to 10, and again at days 30 to 40 for signs of infection, hematoma, seroma, or dehiscence. Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat analysis, and risk ratios were calculated. Results. No significant differences were found between the two groups. Only 2.8% of patients in the intervention group developed surgical wound complications during hospitalization. However, 7 to 10 days following discharge, these rates reached 23.0% and 15.4% in the intervention and nonintervention groups, respectively (RR = 1.50, 95% CI = 0.84–2.60). Conclusion. Further studies should confirm whether the use of electrocautery for coagulation does not increase the risk of surgical wound complications in patients undergoing Caesarean sections.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/602375
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cristiane M. Moreira
Eliana Amaral
spellingShingle Cristiane M. Moreira
Eliana Amaral
Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean Sections
The Scientific World Journal
author_facet Cristiane M. Moreira
Eliana Amaral
author_sort Cristiane M. Moreira
title Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean Sections
title_short Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean Sections
title_full Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean Sections
title_fullStr Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean Sections
title_full_unstemmed Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean Sections
title_sort use of electrocautery for coagulation and wound complications in caesarean sections
publisher Hindawi Limited
series The Scientific World Journal
issn 2356-6140
1537-744X
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Objective. To evaluate the safety of electrocautery for coagulation during Caesarean sections. Study Design. A randomized, controlled, clinical pilot study was performed at a university maternity hospital. After admission for delivery and decision to perform a C-section, volunteers were randomized to either the intervention group (use of electrocautery for coagulation) or nonintervention group. The women were examined at the time of postpartum discharge (day 3), at days 7 to 10, and again at days 30 to 40 for signs of infection, hematoma, seroma, or dehiscence. Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat analysis, and risk ratios were calculated. Results. No significant differences were found between the two groups. Only 2.8% of patients in the intervention group developed surgical wound complications during hospitalization. However, 7 to 10 days following discharge, these rates reached 23.0% and 15.4% in the intervention and nonintervention groups, respectively (RR = 1.50, 95% CI = 0.84–2.60). Conclusion. Further studies should confirm whether the use of electrocautery for coagulation does not increase the risk of surgical wound complications in patients undergoing Caesarean sections.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/602375
work_keys_str_mv AT cristianemmoreira useofelectrocauteryforcoagulationandwoundcomplicationsincaesareansections
AT elianaamaral useofelectrocauteryforcoagulationandwoundcomplicationsincaesareansections
_version_ 1725347662451965952