What triggers firms to appoint outside directors beyond the legal minimum requirement?

Background: Although previous studies provide important insights on how firms respond to institutional pressure, they fail to acknowledge the salience of globalisation that results in institutional pressures diffusing across countries. Objectives: Drawing on a selective adaptation model, this artic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bum-Jin Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2018-11-01
Series:South African Journal of Business Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/319
id doaj-84e36b94635e4dd68ec9fe63d3313967
record_format Article
spelling doaj-84e36b94635e4dd68ec9fe63d33139672021-03-02T09:39:04ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Business Management2078-55852078-59762018-11-01491e1e1210.4102/sajbm.v49i1.319999What triggers firms to appoint outside directors beyond the legal minimum requirement?Bum-Jin Park0Department of Business Administration, Soonchunhyang University, Republic of KoreaBackground: Although previous studies provide important insights on how firms respond to institutional pressure, they fail to acknowledge the salience of globalisation that results in institutional pressures diffusing across countries. Objectives: Drawing on a selective adaptation model, this article examines whether firms comply with reforms to board structures beyond the minimum legal requirement. Method: It investigates the determinants of appointing outside directors beyond the minimum legal requirement by analysing the relationship between four main variables and minimum compliance. Results: Using a sample of Korean listed firms during 2002–2014, this study found that the salient organisational conditions (firm complexity and firm performance) and key organisational actors (controlling shareholders and foreign investors) determine the extent to which firms appoint outside directors on their boards. Conclusion: This study contributes to the strategy literature that examines organisational response to institutional pressure, furthering the understanding of why there is heterogeneity in firm decisions even from firms in the same institutional environment that face similar institutional pressures. Moreover, it makes a contribution to corporate governance literature, in particular to the adoption of governance mechanisms that originate from foreign models.https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/319corporate governanceselective adaptationKoreaoutside directors
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bum-Jin Park
spellingShingle Bum-Jin Park
What triggers firms to appoint outside directors beyond the legal minimum requirement?
South African Journal of Business Management
corporate governance
selective adaptation
Korea
outside directors
author_facet Bum-Jin Park
author_sort Bum-Jin Park
title What triggers firms to appoint outside directors beyond the legal minimum requirement?
title_short What triggers firms to appoint outside directors beyond the legal minimum requirement?
title_full What triggers firms to appoint outside directors beyond the legal minimum requirement?
title_fullStr What triggers firms to appoint outside directors beyond the legal minimum requirement?
title_full_unstemmed What triggers firms to appoint outside directors beyond the legal minimum requirement?
title_sort what triggers firms to appoint outside directors beyond the legal minimum requirement?
publisher AOSIS
series South African Journal of Business Management
issn 2078-5585
2078-5976
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Background: Although previous studies provide important insights on how firms respond to institutional pressure, they fail to acknowledge the salience of globalisation that results in institutional pressures diffusing across countries. Objectives: Drawing on a selective adaptation model, this article examines whether firms comply with reforms to board structures beyond the minimum legal requirement. Method: It investigates the determinants of appointing outside directors beyond the minimum legal requirement by analysing the relationship between four main variables and minimum compliance. Results: Using a sample of Korean listed firms during 2002–2014, this study found that the salient organisational conditions (firm complexity and firm performance) and key organisational actors (controlling shareholders and foreign investors) determine the extent to which firms appoint outside directors on their boards. Conclusion: This study contributes to the strategy literature that examines organisational response to institutional pressure, furthering the understanding of why there is heterogeneity in firm decisions even from firms in the same institutional environment that face similar institutional pressures. Moreover, it makes a contribution to corporate governance literature, in particular to the adoption of governance mechanisms that originate from foreign models.
topic corporate governance
selective adaptation
Korea
outside directors
url https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/319
work_keys_str_mv AT bumjinpark whattriggersfirmstoappointoutsidedirectorsbeyondthelegalminimumrequirement
_version_ 1724238814445043712