APPROVING COMMENTARY TO THE VERDICT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN OLSZTYN DATED 20 AUGUST 2020 (FILE NO. II SA/Ol 426/20)

The commentary asks the fundamental question: May sport or tourism activities be carried out within municipal culture centers? The answer to the question thus posed (after an analysis of not only the grounds of the judgement covered by the commentary and the views of the doctrine, but also of other...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stanisław Bułajewski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki Euroregionalnej im. Alcide De Gasperi 2021-07-01
Series:Journal of Modern Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jomswsge.com/GLOSA-APROBUJACA-DO-WYROKU-WOJEWODZKIEGO-SADU-ADMINISTRACYJNEGO-W-OLSZTYNIE-Z-20,139238,0,2.html
id doaj-84cd62b4871a4d82a4ef38ca05419f5d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-84cd62b4871a4d82a4ef38ca05419f5d2021-09-14T14:40:19ZengWyższa Szkoła Gospodarki Euroregionalnej im. Alcide De GasperiJournal of Modern Science1734-20312391-789X2021-07-0146143545010.13166/jms/139238139238APPROVING COMMENTARY TO THE VERDICT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN OLSZTYN DATED 20 AUGUST 2020 (FILE NO. II SA/Ol 426/20)Stanisław Bułajewski0Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w OlsztynieThe commentary asks the fundamental question: May sport or tourism activities be carried out within municipal culture centers? The answer to the question thus posed (after an analysis of not only the grounds of the judgement covered by the commentary and the views of the doctrine, but also of other court verdicts) is negative. Local government units do not have full freedom in defining the scope of tasks assigned to their own organizational entities. A change of the way of performing tasks requires consideration of many regulations that define the limits of the self-government’s organizational authority. Thus, a local government’s cultural institutions may not perform tasks related to sports or recreation. The above thesis was presented in the commentary to the verdict of the administrative court in Olsztyn dated 20 August 2020 (file no. II SA/Ol 426/20) One must keep in mind that cultural activity is a mandatory task performed by units of local government (Article 9(2)). Article 13 of the Act on organization and conduct of cultural activity provides that cultural institutions operate on the basis of their establishing acts and the statutes issued by their organizers. In conclusion, I expressed the view that joint performance of the aforementioned tasks (related to culture, sports, and tourism) within one entity is inadmissible, because financing of cultural institutions, as separate entities, is carried out according different principles than financing of tasks related to sports.https://www.jomswsge.com/GLOSA-APROBUJACA-DO-WYROKU-WOJEWODZKIEGO-SADU-ADMINISTRACYJNEGO-W-OLSZTYNIE-Z-20,139238,0,2.htmlcultural institutionssportslocal governmentlocal government's tasksstatutes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stanisław Bułajewski
spellingShingle Stanisław Bułajewski
APPROVING COMMENTARY TO THE VERDICT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN OLSZTYN DATED 20 AUGUST 2020 (FILE NO. II SA/Ol 426/20)
Journal of Modern Science
cultural institutions
sports
local government
local government's tasks
statutes
author_facet Stanisław Bułajewski
author_sort Stanisław Bułajewski
title APPROVING COMMENTARY TO THE VERDICT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN OLSZTYN DATED 20 AUGUST 2020 (FILE NO. II SA/Ol 426/20)
title_short APPROVING COMMENTARY TO THE VERDICT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN OLSZTYN DATED 20 AUGUST 2020 (FILE NO. II SA/Ol 426/20)
title_full APPROVING COMMENTARY TO THE VERDICT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN OLSZTYN DATED 20 AUGUST 2020 (FILE NO. II SA/Ol 426/20)
title_fullStr APPROVING COMMENTARY TO THE VERDICT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN OLSZTYN DATED 20 AUGUST 2020 (FILE NO. II SA/Ol 426/20)
title_full_unstemmed APPROVING COMMENTARY TO THE VERDICT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN OLSZTYN DATED 20 AUGUST 2020 (FILE NO. II SA/Ol 426/20)
title_sort approving commentary to the verdict of the administrative court in olsztyn dated 20 august 2020 (file no. ii sa/ol 426/20)
publisher Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki Euroregionalnej im. Alcide De Gasperi
series Journal of Modern Science
issn 1734-2031
2391-789X
publishDate 2021-07-01
description The commentary asks the fundamental question: May sport or tourism activities be carried out within municipal culture centers? The answer to the question thus posed (after an analysis of not only the grounds of the judgement covered by the commentary and the views of the doctrine, but also of other court verdicts) is negative. Local government units do not have full freedom in defining the scope of tasks assigned to their own organizational entities. A change of the way of performing tasks requires consideration of many regulations that define the limits of the self-government’s organizational authority. Thus, a local government’s cultural institutions may not perform tasks related to sports or recreation. The above thesis was presented in the commentary to the verdict of the administrative court in Olsztyn dated 20 August 2020 (file no. II SA/Ol 426/20) One must keep in mind that cultural activity is a mandatory task performed by units of local government (Article 9(2)). Article 13 of the Act on organization and conduct of cultural activity provides that cultural institutions operate on the basis of their establishing acts and the statutes issued by their organizers. In conclusion, I expressed the view that joint performance of the aforementioned tasks (related to culture, sports, and tourism) within one entity is inadmissible, because financing of cultural institutions, as separate entities, is carried out according different principles than financing of tasks related to sports.
topic cultural institutions
sports
local government
local government's tasks
statutes
url https://www.jomswsge.com/GLOSA-APROBUJACA-DO-WYROKU-WOJEWODZKIEGO-SADU-ADMINISTRACYJNEGO-W-OLSZTYNIE-Z-20,139238,0,2.html
work_keys_str_mv AT stanisławbułajewski approvingcommentarytotheverdictoftheadministrativecourtinolsztyndated20august2020filenoiisaol42620
_version_ 1717379741210640384