Some implications of sampling choices on comparisons between satellite and model aerosol optical depth fields

The comparison of satellite and model aerosol optical depth (AOD) fields provides useful information on the strengths and weaknesses of both. However, the sampling of satellite and models is very different and some subjective decisions about data selection and aggregation must be made in order t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. M. Sayer, G. E. Thomas, P. I. Palmer, R. G. Grainger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2010-11-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/10705/2010/acp-10-10705-2010.pdf
id doaj-84c97e1a3f8d46788f6a64177fb211c4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-84c97e1a3f8d46788f6a64177fb211c42020-11-24T23:44:06ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242010-11-011022107051071610.5194/acp-10-10705-2010Some implications of sampling choices on comparisons between satellite and model aerosol optical depth fieldsA. M. SayerG. E. ThomasP. I. PalmerR. G. GraingerThe comparison of satellite and model aerosol optical depth (AOD) fields provides useful information on the strengths and weaknesses of both. However, the sampling of satellite and models is very different and some subjective decisions about data selection and aggregation must be made in order to perform such comparisons. This work examines some implications of these decisions, using GlobAerosol AOD retrievals at 550 nm from Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) measurements, and aerosol fields from the GEOS-Chem chemistry transport model. It is recommended to sample the model only where the satellite flies over on a particular day; neglecting this can cause regional differences in model AOD of up to 0.1 on monthly and annual timescales. The comparison is observed to depend strongly upon thresholds for sparsity of satellite retrievals in the model grid cells. Requiring at least 25% coverage of the model grid cell by satellite data decreases the observed difference between the two by approximately half over land. The impact over ocean is smaller. In both model and satellite datasets, there is an anticorrelation between the proportion <i>p</i> of a model grid cell covered by satellite retrievals and the AOD. This is attributed to small <i>p</i> typically occuring due to high cloud cover and lower AODs being found in large clear-sky regions. Daily median AATSR AODs were found to be closer to GEOS-Chem AODs than daily means (with the root mean squared difference being approximately 0.05 smaller). This is due to the decreased sensitivity of medians to outliers such as cloud-contaminated retrievals, or aerosol point sources not included in the model. http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/10705/2010/acp-10-10705-2010.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. M. Sayer
G. E. Thomas
P. I. Palmer
R. G. Grainger
spellingShingle A. M. Sayer
G. E. Thomas
P. I. Palmer
R. G. Grainger
Some implications of sampling choices on comparisons between satellite and model aerosol optical depth fields
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet A. M. Sayer
G. E. Thomas
P. I. Palmer
R. G. Grainger
author_sort A. M. Sayer
title Some implications of sampling choices on comparisons between satellite and model aerosol optical depth fields
title_short Some implications of sampling choices on comparisons between satellite and model aerosol optical depth fields
title_full Some implications of sampling choices on comparisons between satellite and model aerosol optical depth fields
title_fullStr Some implications of sampling choices on comparisons between satellite and model aerosol optical depth fields
title_full_unstemmed Some implications of sampling choices on comparisons between satellite and model aerosol optical depth fields
title_sort some implications of sampling choices on comparisons between satellite and model aerosol optical depth fields
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2010-11-01
description The comparison of satellite and model aerosol optical depth (AOD) fields provides useful information on the strengths and weaknesses of both. However, the sampling of satellite and models is very different and some subjective decisions about data selection and aggregation must be made in order to perform such comparisons. This work examines some implications of these decisions, using GlobAerosol AOD retrievals at 550 nm from Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) measurements, and aerosol fields from the GEOS-Chem chemistry transport model. It is recommended to sample the model only where the satellite flies over on a particular day; neglecting this can cause regional differences in model AOD of up to 0.1 on monthly and annual timescales. The comparison is observed to depend strongly upon thresholds for sparsity of satellite retrievals in the model grid cells. Requiring at least 25% coverage of the model grid cell by satellite data decreases the observed difference between the two by approximately half over land. The impact over ocean is smaller. In both model and satellite datasets, there is an anticorrelation between the proportion <i>p</i> of a model grid cell covered by satellite retrievals and the AOD. This is attributed to small <i>p</i> typically occuring due to high cloud cover and lower AODs being found in large clear-sky regions. Daily median AATSR AODs were found to be closer to GEOS-Chem AODs than daily means (with the root mean squared difference being approximately 0.05 smaller). This is due to the decreased sensitivity of medians to outliers such as cloud-contaminated retrievals, or aerosol point sources not included in the model.
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/10705/2010/acp-10-10705-2010.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT amsayer someimplicationsofsamplingchoicesoncomparisonsbetweensatelliteandmodelaerosolopticaldepthfields
AT gethomas someimplicationsofsamplingchoicesoncomparisonsbetweensatelliteandmodelaerosolopticaldepthfields
AT pipalmer someimplicationsofsamplingchoicesoncomparisonsbetweensatelliteandmodelaerosolopticaldepthfields
AT rggrainger someimplicationsofsamplingchoicesoncomparisonsbetweensatelliteandmodelaerosolopticaldepthfields
_version_ 1725500009812590592