Visuomotor transformation in the fly gaze stabilization system.

For sensory signals to control an animal's behavior, they must first be transformed into a format appropriate for use by its motor systems. This fundamental problem is faced by all animals, including humans. Beyond simple reflexes, little is known about how such sensorimotor transformations tak...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephen J Huston, Holger G Krapp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2008-07-01
Series:PLoS Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2475543?pdf=render
id doaj-84b6a28503e443a695ceaf4c855b226e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-84b6a28503e443a695ceaf4c855b226e2021-07-02T05:40:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Biology1544-91731545-78852008-07-0167e17310.1371/journal.pbio.0060173Visuomotor transformation in the fly gaze stabilization system.Stephen J HustonHolger G KrappFor sensory signals to control an animal's behavior, they must first be transformed into a format appropriate for use by its motor systems. This fundamental problem is faced by all animals, including humans. Beyond simple reflexes, little is known about how such sensorimotor transformations take place. Here we describe how the outputs of a well-characterized population of fly visual interneurons, lobula plate tangential cells (LPTCs), are used by the animal's gaze-stabilizing neck motor system. The LPTCs respond to visual input arising from both self-rotations and translations of the fly. The neck motor system however is involved in gaze stabilization and thus mainly controls compensatory head rotations. We investigated how the neck motor system is able to selectively extract rotation information from the mixed responses of the LPTCs. We recorded extracellularly from fly neck motor neurons (NMNs) and mapped the directional preferences across their extended visual receptive fields. Our results suggest that-like the tangential cells-NMNs are tuned to panoramic retinal image shifts, or optic flow fields, which occur when the fly rotates about particular body axes. In many cases, tangential cells and motor neurons appear to be tuned to similar axes of rotation, resulting in a correlation between the coordinate systems the two neural populations employ. However, in contrast to the primarily monocular receptive fields of the tangential cells, most NMNs are sensitive to visual motion presented to either eye. This results in the NMNs being more selective for rotation than the LPTCs. Thus, the neck motor system increases its rotation selectivity by a comparatively simple mechanism: the integration of binocular visual motion information.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2475543?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephen J Huston
Holger G Krapp
spellingShingle Stephen J Huston
Holger G Krapp
Visuomotor transformation in the fly gaze stabilization system.
PLoS Biology
author_facet Stephen J Huston
Holger G Krapp
author_sort Stephen J Huston
title Visuomotor transformation in the fly gaze stabilization system.
title_short Visuomotor transformation in the fly gaze stabilization system.
title_full Visuomotor transformation in the fly gaze stabilization system.
title_fullStr Visuomotor transformation in the fly gaze stabilization system.
title_full_unstemmed Visuomotor transformation in the fly gaze stabilization system.
title_sort visuomotor transformation in the fly gaze stabilization system.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Biology
issn 1544-9173
1545-7885
publishDate 2008-07-01
description For sensory signals to control an animal's behavior, they must first be transformed into a format appropriate for use by its motor systems. This fundamental problem is faced by all animals, including humans. Beyond simple reflexes, little is known about how such sensorimotor transformations take place. Here we describe how the outputs of a well-characterized population of fly visual interneurons, lobula plate tangential cells (LPTCs), are used by the animal's gaze-stabilizing neck motor system. The LPTCs respond to visual input arising from both self-rotations and translations of the fly. The neck motor system however is involved in gaze stabilization and thus mainly controls compensatory head rotations. We investigated how the neck motor system is able to selectively extract rotation information from the mixed responses of the LPTCs. We recorded extracellularly from fly neck motor neurons (NMNs) and mapped the directional preferences across their extended visual receptive fields. Our results suggest that-like the tangential cells-NMNs are tuned to panoramic retinal image shifts, or optic flow fields, which occur when the fly rotates about particular body axes. In many cases, tangential cells and motor neurons appear to be tuned to similar axes of rotation, resulting in a correlation between the coordinate systems the two neural populations employ. However, in contrast to the primarily monocular receptive fields of the tangential cells, most NMNs are sensitive to visual motion presented to either eye. This results in the NMNs being more selective for rotation than the LPTCs. Thus, the neck motor system increases its rotation selectivity by a comparatively simple mechanism: the integration of binocular visual motion information.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2475543?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenjhuston visuomotortransformationintheflygazestabilizationsystem
AT holgergkrapp visuomotortransformationintheflygazestabilizationsystem
_version_ 1721338405971820544