The Quality of the Evidence According to GRADE Is Predominantly Low or Very Low in Oral Health Systematic Reviews.
The main objective was to assess the credibility of the evidence using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) in oral health systematic reviews on the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and elsewhere.Systematic Reviews or meta-analyses (January 2008-Dec...
Main Authors: | Nikolaos Pandis, Padhraig S Fleming, Helen Worthington, Georgia Salanti |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4498810?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews.
by: Nikolaos Pandis, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Blinded by PRISMA: are systematic reviewers focusing on PRISMA and ignoring other guidelines?
by: Padhraig S Fleming, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
The effects of fixed and removable orthodontic retainers: a systematic review
by: Dalya Al-Moghrabi, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01) -
Clinical evaluation of marketed orthodontic products: are researchers behind the times? A meta-epidemiological study
by: Jadbinder Seehra, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01) -
Outcome discrepancies and selective reporting: impacting the leading journals?
by: Padhraig S Fleming, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)