Characteristics of adolescents who expressed indifference or no interest towards body art

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study examines the underlying characteristics of adolescents attending Italian secondary school who expressed indifference towards or no interest at all in body art.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A convenience sa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xodo Carla C, Cegolon Luca, Mastrangelo Giuseppe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-10-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/605
id doaj-8480c62507654846a5654c443f7e7ac9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8480c62507654846a5654c443f7e7ac92020-11-24T21:21:53ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582010-10-0110160510.1186/1471-2458-10-605Characteristics of adolescents who expressed indifference or no interest towards body artXodo Carla CCegolon LucaMastrangelo Giuseppe<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study examines the underlying characteristics of adolescents attending Italian secondary school who expressed indifference towards or no interest at all in body art.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A convenience sample of 4,277 secondary school students from the North Eastern Italy were surveyed with a self-reported questionnaire collecting extensive socio-demographic information. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to investigate the characteristics of those who were not interested or indifferent towards piercing and tattoo, reporting adjusted Odds Ratios (aOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Prevalence of tattoo was 6%, whereas body piercing was 20%; 66% (= 558/840) of those with a piercing were underage (<18 years of age), the equivalent for tattoo being 62% (= 159/258). 166 individuals reported having both piercing and tattoo and 152 of these (92% = 152/166) were <18 years of age. The factors found to be predominately higher in those indifferent or who did not indicate interest in body art were: higher school year, increasing father's education and a greater perception of the associated health risks.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Proactive health education campaigns by school educators and family physicians should focus on adolescents of less educated fathers and pupils less aware of the health risks associated with body art. In this respect junior secondary school students can be regarded as the ideal target of such campaigns.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/605
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xodo Carla C
Cegolon Luca
Mastrangelo Giuseppe
spellingShingle Xodo Carla C
Cegolon Luca
Mastrangelo Giuseppe
Characteristics of adolescents who expressed indifference or no interest towards body art
BMC Public Health
author_facet Xodo Carla C
Cegolon Luca
Mastrangelo Giuseppe
author_sort Xodo Carla C
title Characteristics of adolescents who expressed indifference or no interest towards body art
title_short Characteristics of adolescents who expressed indifference or no interest towards body art
title_full Characteristics of adolescents who expressed indifference or no interest towards body art
title_fullStr Characteristics of adolescents who expressed indifference or no interest towards body art
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of adolescents who expressed indifference or no interest towards body art
title_sort characteristics of adolescents who expressed indifference or no interest towards body art
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2010-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study examines the underlying characteristics of adolescents attending Italian secondary school who expressed indifference towards or no interest at all in body art.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A convenience sample of 4,277 secondary school students from the North Eastern Italy were surveyed with a self-reported questionnaire collecting extensive socio-demographic information. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to investigate the characteristics of those who were not interested or indifferent towards piercing and tattoo, reporting adjusted Odds Ratios (aOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Prevalence of tattoo was 6%, whereas body piercing was 20%; 66% (= 558/840) of those with a piercing were underage (<18 years of age), the equivalent for tattoo being 62% (= 159/258). 166 individuals reported having both piercing and tattoo and 152 of these (92% = 152/166) were <18 years of age. The factors found to be predominately higher in those indifferent or who did not indicate interest in body art were: higher school year, increasing father's education and a greater perception of the associated health risks.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Proactive health education campaigns by school educators and family physicians should focus on adolescents of less educated fathers and pupils less aware of the health risks associated with body art. In this respect junior secondary school students can be regarded as the ideal target of such campaigns.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/605
work_keys_str_mv AT xodocarlac characteristicsofadolescentswhoexpressedindifferenceornointeresttowardsbodyart
AT cegolonluca characteristicsofadolescentswhoexpressedindifferenceornointeresttowardsbodyart
AT mastrangelogiuseppe characteristicsofadolescentswhoexpressedindifferenceornointeresttowardsbodyart
_version_ 1725997838476771328