Screening for Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnancy: Is It Worthwhile?
There is a high incidence of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy resulting in adverse maternal (miscarriages, anaemia in pregnancy, preeclampsia, abruptio placenta and post-partum haemorrhage) and fetal effects (premature birth, low birth weight, increased neonatal respiratory distress) which may...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2011-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Thyroid Research |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/397012 |
id |
doaj-847848276a8a4fdcbcfa089a99cabe76 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-847848276a8a4fdcbcfa089a99cabe762020-11-24T22:17:45ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Thyroid Research2042-00722011-01-01201110.4061/2011/397012397012Screening for Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnancy: Is It Worthwhile?John H. Lazarus0Centre for Endocrine and Diabetes Sciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UKThere is a high incidence of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy resulting in adverse maternal (miscarriages, anaemia in pregnancy, preeclampsia, abruptio placenta and post-partum haemorrhage) and fetal effects (premature birth, low birth weight, increased neonatal respiratory distress) which may justify screening for thyroid function during early pregnancy with interventional levothyroxine therapy for thyroid hypofunction. There is a greater prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism in women with delivery before 32 weeks and there is even an association between thyroid autoimmunity and adverse obstetric outcome, which is independent of thyroid function. Higher maternal TSH levels even within the normal reference range are associated with an increased risk of miscarriages, fetal and neonatal distress and preterm delivery. There are few prospective randomised trials to substantiate the benefit of screening and the recently reported CATS study did not show a benefit in child IQ at age 3 years. Nevertheless there seems to be a case for screening to prevent adverse obstetric outcomes. The clinical epidemiological evidence base does not justify universal screening at the present time. However, it is probable that more evidence will be produced which may alter this view in the future.http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/397012 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
John H. Lazarus |
spellingShingle |
John H. Lazarus Screening for Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnancy: Is It Worthwhile? Journal of Thyroid Research |
author_facet |
John H. Lazarus |
author_sort |
John H. Lazarus |
title |
Screening for Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnancy: Is It Worthwhile? |
title_short |
Screening for Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnancy: Is It Worthwhile? |
title_full |
Screening for Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnancy: Is It Worthwhile? |
title_fullStr |
Screening for Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnancy: Is It Worthwhile? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Screening for Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnancy: Is It Worthwhile? |
title_sort |
screening for thyroid dysfunction in pregnancy: is it worthwhile? |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Journal of Thyroid Research |
issn |
2042-0072 |
publishDate |
2011-01-01 |
description |
There is a high incidence of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy resulting in adverse maternal (miscarriages, anaemia in pregnancy, preeclampsia, abruptio placenta and post-partum haemorrhage) and fetal effects (premature birth, low birth weight, increased neonatal respiratory distress) which may justify screening for thyroid function during early pregnancy with interventional levothyroxine therapy for thyroid hypofunction. There is a greater prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism in women with delivery before 32 weeks and there is even an association between thyroid autoimmunity and adverse obstetric outcome, which is independent of thyroid function. Higher maternal TSH levels even within the normal reference range are associated with an increased risk of miscarriages, fetal and neonatal distress and preterm delivery. There are few prospective randomised trials to substantiate the benefit of screening and the recently reported CATS study did not show a benefit in child IQ at age 3 years. Nevertheless there seems to be a case for screening to prevent adverse obstetric outcomes. The clinical epidemiological evidence base does not justify universal screening at the present time. However, it is probable that more evidence will be produced which may alter this view in the future. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/397012 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT johnhlazarus screeningforthyroiddysfunctioninpregnancyisitworthwhile |
_version_ |
1725784677601509376 |