Defensive Metabolites from Antarctic Invertebrates: Does Energetic Content Interfere with Feeding Repellence?

Many bioactive products from benthic invertebrates mediating ecological interactions have proved to reduce predation, but their mechanisms of action, and their molecular identities, are usually unknown. It was suggested, yet scarcely investigated, that nutritional quality interferes with defensive m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Núñez-Pons, Conxita Avila
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-06-01
Series:Marine Drugs
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1660-3397/12/6/3770
id doaj-845bd96f44ff49c59e2525c387efad4b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-845bd96f44ff49c59e2525c387efad4b2020-11-25T01:00:41ZengMDPI AGMarine Drugs1660-33972014-06-011263770379110.3390/md12063770md12063770Defensive Metabolites from Antarctic Invertebrates: Does Energetic Content Interfere with Feeding Repellence?Laura Núñez-Pons0Conxita Avila1Department of Animal Biology (Invertebrates) & Biodiversity Research Institute (IrBio), Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 643, Barcelona ES-08028, Catalonia, SpainDepartment of Animal Biology (Invertebrates) & Biodiversity Research Institute (IrBio), Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 643, Barcelona ES-08028, Catalonia, SpainMany bioactive products from benthic invertebrates mediating ecological interactions have proved to reduce predation, but their mechanisms of action, and their molecular identities, are usually unknown. It was suggested, yet scarcely investigated, that nutritional quality interferes with defensive metabolites. This means that antifeedants would be less effective when combined with energetically rich prey, and that higher amounts of defensive compounds would be needed for predator avoidance. We evaluated the effects of five types of repellents obtained from Antarctic invertebrates, in combination with diets of different energetic values. The compounds came from soft corals, ascidians and hexactinellid sponges; they included wax esters, alkaloids, a meroterpenoid, a steroid, and the recently described organic acid, glassponsine. Feeding repellency was tested through preference assays by preparing diets (alginate pearls) combining different energetic content and inorganic material. Experimental diets contained various concentrations of each repellent product, and were offered along with control compound-free pearls, to the Antarctic omnivore amphipod Cheirimedon femoratus. Meridianin alkaloids were the most active repellents, and wax esters were the least active when combined with foods of distinct energetic content. Our data show that levels of repellency vary for each compound, and that they perform differently when mixed with distinct assay foods. The natural products that interacted the most with energetic content were those occurring in nature at higher concentrations. The bioactivity of the remaining metabolites tested was found to depend on a threshold concentration, enough to elicit feeding repellence, independently from nutritional quality.http://www.mdpi.com/1660-3397/12/6/3770chemical ecologymarine natural productsamphipod Cheirimedon femoratus hexactinellid spongescolonial ascidianssoft coralschemical defense
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Núñez-Pons
Conxita Avila
spellingShingle Laura Núñez-Pons
Conxita Avila
Defensive Metabolites from Antarctic Invertebrates: Does Energetic Content Interfere with Feeding Repellence?
Marine Drugs
chemical ecology
marine natural products
amphipod Cheirimedon femoratus
hexactinellid sponges
colonial ascidians
soft corals
chemical defense
author_facet Laura Núñez-Pons
Conxita Avila
author_sort Laura Núñez-Pons
title Defensive Metabolites from Antarctic Invertebrates: Does Energetic Content Interfere with Feeding Repellence?
title_short Defensive Metabolites from Antarctic Invertebrates: Does Energetic Content Interfere with Feeding Repellence?
title_full Defensive Metabolites from Antarctic Invertebrates: Does Energetic Content Interfere with Feeding Repellence?
title_fullStr Defensive Metabolites from Antarctic Invertebrates: Does Energetic Content Interfere with Feeding Repellence?
title_full_unstemmed Defensive Metabolites from Antarctic Invertebrates: Does Energetic Content Interfere with Feeding Repellence?
title_sort defensive metabolites from antarctic invertebrates: does energetic content interfere with feeding repellence?
publisher MDPI AG
series Marine Drugs
issn 1660-3397
publishDate 2014-06-01
description Many bioactive products from benthic invertebrates mediating ecological interactions have proved to reduce predation, but their mechanisms of action, and their molecular identities, are usually unknown. It was suggested, yet scarcely investigated, that nutritional quality interferes with defensive metabolites. This means that antifeedants would be less effective when combined with energetically rich prey, and that higher amounts of defensive compounds would be needed for predator avoidance. We evaluated the effects of five types of repellents obtained from Antarctic invertebrates, in combination with diets of different energetic values. The compounds came from soft corals, ascidians and hexactinellid sponges; they included wax esters, alkaloids, a meroterpenoid, a steroid, and the recently described organic acid, glassponsine. Feeding repellency was tested through preference assays by preparing diets (alginate pearls) combining different energetic content and inorganic material. Experimental diets contained various concentrations of each repellent product, and were offered along with control compound-free pearls, to the Antarctic omnivore amphipod Cheirimedon femoratus. Meridianin alkaloids were the most active repellents, and wax esters were the least active when combined with foods of distinct energetic content. Our data show that levels of repellency vary for each compound, and that they perform differently when mixed with distinct assay foods. The natural products that interacted the most with energetic content were those occurring in nature at higher concentrations. The bioactivity of the remaining metabolites tested was found to depend on a threshold concentration, enough to elicit feeding repellence, independently from nutritional quality.
topic chemical ecology
marine natural products
amphipod Cheirimedon femoratus
hexactinellid sponges
colonial ascidians
soft corals
chemical defense
url http://www.mdpi.com/1660-3397/12/6/3770
work_keys_str_mv AT lauranunezpons defensivemetabolitesfromantarcticinvertebratesdoesenergeticcontentinterferewithfeedingrepellence
AT conxitaavila defensivemetabolitesfromantarcticinvertebratesdoesenergeticcontentinterferewithfeedingrepellence
_version_ 1725212536501960704