Influence of endodontic instrument-holder on sterilization efficacy. A pilot in-vitro study.

Infection control is crucial in dentistry and various methods have been designed to assure its efficacy. However, little information exists regarding the influence it could have the instrument-holder of endodontic files. The aim of this research was to determine the influence of three instruments-ho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Angelo Carrizo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Concepción. 2013-08-01
Series:Journal of Oral Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/38/44
id doaj-84518037546b4eb6a6d163748602e7da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-84518037546b4eb6a6d163748602e7da2020-11-25T02:52:26ZengUniversidad de Concepción.Journal of Oral Research0719-24600719-24792013-08-0122687110.17126/joralres.2013.015Influence of endodontic instrument-holder on sterilization efficacy. A pilot in-vitro study.Angelo Carrizo0CESFAM Boca Sur. San Pedro de la Paz, Chile.Infection control is crucial in dentistry and various methods have been designed to assure its efficacy. However, little information exists regarding the influence it could have the instrument-holder of endodontic files. The aim of this research was to determine the influence of three instruments-holders on sterilization efficacy of endodontic files. Methods: A pilot in-vitro study. 60 endodontic files were contaminated by biomechanical preparation of extracted molars with periapical abscess, then processed according to the standard washing method. The endodontic files were divided into 3 groups (n=20) and assigned to 3 instrument-holders: Metallic box (MB), surgical gauze (SG) and synthetic sponge (SS). Then, the files were packaged and sterilized by autoclaving (134°C/45min). Microbiological culture was performed in thioglycolate solution for each endodontic file (37ºC/5days). Results: The overall sterilization efficacy was 91.7%, 80% for MB, 100% for SS, and 95% for SG, with no statistically significant differences (p=0.06) between the groups. Conclusions: The lack of differences in the efficacy of sterilization may be due to the reduced sample; therefore, a full-size study is necessary to confirm this outcomes. The results of this study discourage the use of the MB as instrument-holder until a full-size study can confirm this data. http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/38/44endodonticssterilizationefficacyinstrument.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Angelo Carrizo
spellingShingle Angelo Carrizo
Influence of endodontic instrument-holder on sterilization efficacy. A pilot in-vitro study.
Journal of Oral Research
endodontics
sterilization
efficacy
instrument.
author_facet Angelo Carrizo
author_sort Angelo Carrizo
title Influence of endodontic instrument-holder on sterilization efficacy. A pilot in-vitro study.
title_short Influence of endodontic instrument-holder on sterilization efficacy. A pilot in-vitro study.
title_full Influence of endodontic instrument-holder on sterilization efficacy. A pilot in-vitro study.
title_fullStr Influence of endodontic instrument-holder on sterilization efficacy. A pilot in-vitro study.
title_full_unstemmed Influence of endodontic instrument-holder on sterilization efficacy. A pilot in-vitro study.
title_sort influence of endodontic instrument-holder on sterilization efficacy. a pilot in-vitro study.
publisher Universidad de Concepción.
series Journal of Oral Research
issn 0719-2460
0719-2479
publishDate 2013-08-01
description Infection control is crucial in dentistry and various methods have been designed to assure its efficacy. However, little information exists regarding the influence it could have the instrument-holder of endodontic files. The aim of this research was to determine the influence of three instruments-holders on sterilization efficacy of endodontic files. Methods: A pilot in-vitro study. 60 endodontic files were contaminated by biomechanical preparation of extracted molars with periapical abscess, then processed according to the standard washing method. The endodontic files were divided into 3 groups (n=20) and assigned to 3 instrument-holders: Metallic box (MB), surgical gauze (SG) and synthetic sponge (SS). Then, the files were packaged and sterilized by autoclaving (134°C/45min). Microbiological culture was performed in thioglycolate solution for each endodontic file (37ºC/5days). Results: The overall sterilization efficacy was 91.7%, 80% for MB, 100% for SS, and 95% for SG, with no statistically significant differences (p=0.06) between the groups. Conclusions: The lack of differences in the efficacy of sterilization may be due to the reduced sample; therefore, a full-size study is necessary to confirm this outcomes. The results of this study discourage the use of the MB as instrument-holder until a full-size study can confirm this data.
topic endodontics
sterilization
efficacy
instrument.
url http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/38/44
work_keys_str_mv AT angelocarrizo influenceofendodonticinstrumentholderonsterilizationefficacyapilotinvitrostudy
_version_ 1724730122092675072