Ethnobotanical knowledge is vastly under-documented in northwestern South America.

A main objective of ethnobotany is to document traditional knowledge about plants before it disappears. However, little is known about the coverage of past ethnobotanical studies and thus about how well the existing literature covers the overall traditional knowledge of different human groups. To br...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rodrigo Cámara-Leret, Narel Paniagua-Zambrana, Henrik Balslev, Manuel J Macía
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3887111?pdf=render
id doaj-844ccca80cf543ce81d9b840b5744bee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-844ccca80cf543ce81d9b840b5744bee2020-11-24T21:45:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0191e8579410.1371/journal.pone.0085794Ethnobotanical knowledge is vastly under-documented in northwestern South America.Rodrigo Cámara-LeretNarel Paniagua-ZambranaHenrik BalslevManuel J MacíaA main objective of ethnobotany is to document traditional knowledge about plants before it disappears. However, little is known about the coverage of past ethnobotanical studies and thus about how well the existing literature covers the overall traditional knowledge of different human groups. To bridge this gap, we investigated ethnobotanical data-collecting efforts across four countries (Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia), three ecoregions (Amazon, Andes, Chocó), and several human groups (including Amerindians, mestizos, and Afro-Americans). We used palms (Arecaceae) as our model group because of their usefulness and pervasiveness in the ethnobotanical literature. We carried out a large number of field interviews (n = 2201) to determine the coverage and quality of palm ethnobotanical data in the existing ethnobotanical literature (n = 255) published over the past 60 years. In our fieldwork in 68 communities, we collected 87,886 use reports and documented 2262 different palm uses and 140 useful palm species. We demonstrate that traditional knowledge on palm uses is vastly under-documented across ecoregions, countries, and human groups. We suggest that the use of standardized data-collecting protocols in wide-ranging ethnobotanical fieldwork is a promising approach for filling critical information gaps. Our work contributes to the Aichi Biodiversity Targets and emphasizes the need for signatory nations to the Convention on Biological Diversity to respond to these information gaps. Given our findings, we hope to stimulate the formulation of clear plans to systematically document ethnobotanical knowledge in northwestern South America and elsewhere before it vanishes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3887111?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rodrigo Cámara-Leret
Narel Paniagua-Zambrana
Henrik Balslev
Manuel J Macía
spellingShingle Rodrigo Cámara-Leret
Narel Paniagua-Zambrana
Henrik Balslev
Manuel J Macía
Ethnobotanical knowledge is vastly under-documented in northwestern South America.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Rodrigo Cámara-Leret
Narel Paniagua-Zambrana
Henrik Balslev
Manuel J Macía
author_sort Rodrigo Cámara-Leret
title Ethnobotanical knowledge is vastly under-documented in northwestern South America.
title_short Ethnobotanical knowledge is vastly under-documented in northwestern South America.
title_full Ethnobotanical knowledge is vastly under-documented in northwestern South America.
title_fullStr Ethnobotanical knowledge is vastly under-documented in northwestern South America.
title_full_unstemmed Ethnobotanical knowledge is vastly under-documented in northwestern South America.
title_sort ethnobotanical knowledge is vastly under-documented in northwestern south america.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description A main objective of ethnobotany is to document traditional knowledge about plants before it disappears. However, little is known about the coverage of past ethnobotanical studies and thus about how well the existing literature covers the overall traditional knowledge of different human groups. To bridge this gap, we investigated ethnobotanical data-collecting efforts across four countries (Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia), three ecoregions (Amazon, Andes, Chocó), and several human groups (including Amerindians, mestizos, and Afro-Americans). We used palms (Arecaceae) as our model group because of their usefulness and pervasiveness in the ethnobotanical literature. We carried out a large number of field interviews (n = 2201) to determine the coverage and quality of palm ethnobotanical data in the existing ethnobotanical literature (n = 255) published over the past 60 years. In our fieldwork in 68 communities, we collected 87,886 use reports and documented 2262 different palm uses and 140 useful palm species. We demonstrate that traditional knowledge on palm uses is vastly under-documented across ecoregions, countries, and human groups. We suggest that the use of standardized data-collecting protocols in wide-ranging ethnobotanical fieldwork is a promising approach for filling critical information gaps. Our work contributes to the Aichi Biodiversity Targets and emphasizes the need for signatory nations to the Convention on Biological Diversity to respond to these information gaps. Given our findings, we hope to stimulate the formulation of clear plans to systematically document ethnobotanical knowledge in northwestern South America and elsewhere before it vanishes.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3887111?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT rodrigocamaraleret ethnobotanicalknowledgeisvastlyunderdocumentedinnorthwesternsouthamerica
AT narelpaniaguazambrana ethnobotanicalknowledgeisvastlyunderdocumentedinnorthwesternsouthamerica
AT henrikbalslev ethnobotanicalknowledgeisvastlyunderdocumentedinnorthwesternsouthamerica
AT manueljmacia ethnobotanicalknowledgeisvastlyunderdocumentedinnorthwesternsouthamerica
_version_ 1725906405723996160