Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to Friedrichson

This article provides a social-scientific interpretation of the role of fasting in Jesus’ parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector in Luke 18:9–14. Specifically, the article considers such social realia as honour and shame, collectivism, and purity in the interpretation of the text. The textua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steven H. Mathews, Ernest van Eck
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 2013-09-01
Series:HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1957
id doaj-844241b3b5a749c7acfe816bdbd3e602
record_format Article
spelling doaj-844241b3b5a749c7acfe816bdbd3e6022020-11-24T21:06:46ZafrAOSISHTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 0259-94222072-80502013-09-01691e1e91772Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to FriedrichsonSteven H. Mathews0Ernest van Eck1Department of New Testament Studies, University of PretoriaDepartment of New Testament Studies, University of PretoriaThis article provides a social-scientific interpretation of the role of fasting in Jesus’ parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector in Luke 18:9–14. Specifically, the article considers such social realia as honour and shame, collectivism, and purity in the interpretation of the text. The textual and social contexts of the text are considered. It is contended that in the parable Jesus presents a caricature of both the Pharisee and the tax collector to make a larger point, in which fasting is not a major consideration. The article also evaluates Friedrichson’s interpretation of this text, which depicts the Pharisee as fasting vicariously, resulting in the justification of the tax collector. Finally, the significance of this text in a holistic theology of fasting in the New Testament is considered.https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1957Fastingparable of the Pharisee and tax collectorthe gospel of Lukesocial-scientific interpretationvicarious fastingtheology of fasting
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Steven H. Mathews
Ernest van Eck
spellingShingle Steven H. Mathews
Ernest van Eck
Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to Friedrichson
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
Fasting
parable of the Pharisee and tax collector
the gospel of Luke
social-scientific interpretation
vicarious fasting
theology of fasting
author_facet Steven H. Mathews
Ernest van Eck
author_sort Steven H. Mathews
title Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to Friedrichson
title_short Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to Friedrichson
title_full Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to Friedrichson
title_fullStr Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to Friedrichson
title_full_unstemmed Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to Friedrichson
title_sort fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in luke 18:9–14: a social-scientific interpretation as response to friedrichson
publisher AOSIS
series HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
issn 0259-9422
2072-8050
publishDate 2013-09-01
description This article provides a social-scientific interpretation of the role of fasting in Jesus’ parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector in Luke 18:9–14. Specifically, the article considers such social realia as honour and shame, collectivism, and purity in the interpretation of the text. The textual and social contexts of the text are considered. It is contended that in the parable Jesus presents a caricature of both the Pharisee and the tax collector to make a larger point, in which fasting is not a major consideration. The article also evaluates Friedrichson’s interpretation of this text, which depicts the Pharisee as fasting vicariously, resulting in the justification of the tax collector. Finally, the significance of this text in a holistic theology of fasting in the New Testament is considered.
topic Fasting
parable of the Pharisee and tax collector
the gospel of Luke
social-scientific interpretation
vicarious fasting
theology of fasting
url https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1957
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenhmathews fastingjustificationandselfrighteousnessinluke18914asocialscientificinterpretationasresponsetofriedrichson
AT ernestvaneck fastingjustificationandselfrighteousnessinluke18914asocialscientificinterpretationasresponsetofriedrichson
_version_ 1716764763143274496