Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to Friedrichson
This article provides a social-scientific interpretation of the role of fasting in Jesus’ parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector in Luke 18:9–14. Specifically, the article considers such social realia as honour and shame, collectivism, and purity in the interpretation of the text. The textua...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Afrikaans |
Published: |
AOSIS
2013-09-01
|
Series: | HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1957 |
id |
doaj-844241b3b5a749c7acfe816bdbd3e602 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-844241b3b5a749c7acfe816bdbd3e6022020-11-24T21:06:46ZafrAOSISHTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 0259-94222072-80502013-09-01691e1e91772Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to FriedrichsonSteven H. Mathews0Ernest van Eck1Department of New Testament Studies, University of PretoriaDepartment of New Testament Studies, University of PretoriaThis article provides a social-scientific interpretation of the role of fasting in Jesus’ parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector in Luke 18:9–14. Specifically, the article considers such social realia as honour and shame, collectivism, and purity in the interpretation of the text. The textual and social contexts of the text are considered. It is contended that in the parable Jesus presents a caricature of both the Pharisee and the tax collector to make a larger point, in which fasting is not a major consideration. The article also evaluates Friedrichson’s interpretation of this text, which depicts the Pharisee as fasting vicariously, resulting in the justification of the tax collector. Finally, the significance of this text in a holistic theology of fasting in the New Testament is considered.https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1957Fastingparable of the Pharisee and tax collectorthe gospel of Lukesocial-scientific interpretationvicarious fastingtheology of fasting |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Afrikaans |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Steven H. Mathews Ernest van Eck |
spellingShingle |
Steven H. Mathews Ernest van Eck Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to Friedrichson HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies Fasting parable of the Pharisee and tax collector the gospel of Luke social-scientific interpretation vicarious fasting theology of fasting |
author_facet |
Steven H. Mathews Ernest van Eck |
author_sort |
Steven H. Mathews |
title |
Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to Friedrichson |
title_short |
Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to Friedrichson |
title_full |
Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to Friedrichson |
title_fullStr |
Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to Friedrichson |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9–14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to Friedrichson |
title_sort |
fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in luke 18:9–14: a social-scientific interpretation as response to friedrichson |
publisher |
AOSIS |
series |
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies |
issn |
0259-9422 2072-8050 |
publishDate |
2013-09-01 |
description |
This article provides a social-scientific interpretation of the role of fasting in Jesus’ parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector in Luke 18:9–14. Specifically, the article considers such social realia as honour and shame, collectivism, and purity in the interpretation of the text. The textual and social contexts of the text are considered. It is contended that in the parable Jesus presents a caricature of both the Pharisee and the tax collector to make a larger point, in which fasting is not a major consideration. The article also evaluates Friedrichson’s interpretation of this text, which depicts the Pharisee as fasting vicariously, resulting in the justification of the tax collector. Finally, the significance of this text in a holistic theology of fasting in the New Testament is considered. |
topic |
Fasting parable of the Pharisee and tax collector the gospel of Luke social-scientific interpretation vicarious fasting theology of fasting |
url |
https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1957 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stevenhmathews fastingjustificationandselfrighteousnessinluke18914asocialscientificinterpretationasresponsetofriedrichson AT ernestvaneck fastingjustificationandselfrighteousnessinluke18914asocialscientificinterpretationasresponsetofriedrichson |
_version_ |
1716764763143274496 |