Quick Response Disaster Research: Opportunities and Challenges for a New Funding Program

Abstract Quick response research conducted by social scientists in the aftermath of a disaster can reveal important findings about hazards and their impacts on communities. Research to collect perishable data, or data that will change or be lost over time, immediately following disaster has been sup...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Greg Oulahen, Brennan Vogel, Chris Gouett-Hanna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-09-01
Series:International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00299-2
id doaj-843ebb155459483d8031092f49c7c69c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-843ebb155459483d8031092f49c7c69c2021-09-19T11:11:37ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Science2095-00552192-63952020-09-0111556857710.1007/s13753-020-00299-2Quick Response Disaster Research: Opportunities and Challenges for a New Funding ProgramGreg Oulahen0Brennan Vogel1Chris Gouett-Hanna2Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Ryerson UniversityCentre for Environment and Sustainability, Western UniversityDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, Ryerson UniversityAbstract Quick response research conducted by social scientists in the aftermath of a disaster can reveal important findings about hazards and their impacts on communities. Research to collect perishable data, or data that will change or be lost over time, immediately following disaster has been supported for decades by two programs in the United States, amassing a collection of quick response studies and an associated research culture. That culture is currently being challenged to better address power imbalances between researchers and disaster-affected participants. Until recently, Canada has not had a quick response grant program. In order to survey the state of knowledge and draw from it in helping to shape the new program in Canada, this article systematically analyzes the body of research created by the two US programs. The results reveal a wide-ranging literature: the studies are theoretically, conceptually, topically, and methodologically quite unique to one another. This diversity might appropriately reflect the nature of disasters, but the finding that many studies are not building on previous quick response research and other insights indicate opportunities for how a new grant program in Canada can contribute to growing a robust subdiscipline of disaster research.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00299-2CanadaDisaster researchHazardsQuick responseSocial science
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Greg Oulahen
Brennan Vogel
Chris Gouett-Hanna
spellingShingle Greg Oulahen
Brennan Vogel
Chris Gouett-Hanna
Quick Response Disaster Research: Opportunities and Challenges for a New Funding Program
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Canada
Disaster research
Hazards
Quick response
Social science
author_facet Greg Oulahen
Brennan Vogel
Chris Gouett-Hanna
author_sort Greg Oulahen
title Quick Response Disaster Research: Opportunities and Challenges for a New Funding Program
title_short Quick Response Disaster Research: Opportunities and Challenges for a New Funding Program
title_full Quick Response Disaster Research: Opportunities and Challenges for a New Funding Program
title_fullStr Quick Response Disaster Research: Opportunities and Challenges for a New Funding Program
title_full_unstemmed Quick Response Disaster Research: Opportunities and Challenges for a New Funding Program
title_sort quick response disaster research: opportunities and challenges for a new funding program
publisher SpringerOpen
series International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
issn 2095-0055
2192-6395
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Abstract Quick response research conducted by social scientists in the aftermath of a disaster can reveal important findings about hazards and their impacts on communities. Research to collect perishable data, or data that will change or be lost over time, immediately following disaster has been supported for decades by two programs in the United States, amassing a collection of quick response studies and an associated research culture. That culture is currently being challenged to better address power imbalances between researchers and disaster-affected participants. Until recently, Canada has not had a quick response grant program. In order to survey the state of knowledge and draw from it in helping to shape the new program in Canada, this article systematically analyzes the body of research created by the two US programs. The results reveal a wide-ranging literature: the studies are theoretically, conceptually, topically, and methodologically quite unique to one another. This diversity might appropriately reflect the nature of disasters, but the finding that many studies are not building on previous quick response research and other insights indicate opportunities for how a new grant program in Canada can contribute to growing a robust subdiscipline of disaster research.
topic Canada
Disaster research
Hazards
Quick response
Social science
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00299-2
work_keys_str_mv AT gregoulahen quickresponsedisasterresearchopportunitiesandchallengesforanewfundingprogram
AT brennanvogel quickresponsedisasterresearchopportunitiesandchallengesforanewfundingprogram
AT chrisgouetthanna quickresponsedisasterresearchopportunitiesandchallengesforanewfundingprogram
_version_ 1717375964772564992