Protecting the “Most Vulnerable”? The Management of a Disaster and the Making/Unmaking of Victims after the 2008 Xenophobic Violence in South Africa
In 2008, South Africa witnessed a bout of xenophobic violence, requiring the state to declare a disaster to manage a massive displacement of migrants and foreigners. How did the South African state come to care for these populations, whereas it had previously sought to avoid providing protection to...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Bielefeld
2016-04-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Conflict and Violence |
Online Access: | https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/3068 |
id |
doaj-843e325e06784f5ba0d97ae0101f2a96 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-843e325e06784f5ba0d97ae0101f2a962020-11-25T02:40:03ZengUniversity of BielefeldInternational Journal of Conflict and Violence1864-13852016-04-019110.4119/ijcv-3068Protecting the “Most Vulnerable”? The Management of a Disaster and the Making/Unmaking of Victims after the 2008 Xenophobic Violence in South AfricaLydie Cabane0London School of Economics and Political Science > Centre for the Analysis of Risk and Regulation In 2008, South Africa witnessed a bout of xenophobic violence, requiring the state to declare a disaster to manage a massive displacement of migrants and foreigners. How did the South African state come to care for these populations, whereas it had previously sought to avoid providing protection to foreigners, and was seen as responsible for fostering xenophobia, if not violence? Analyzing the management of the disaster at the local level (in Cape Town), and the various discourses and mobilizations involved in it, this article shows how widespread violence and displacement rendered migrant vulnerabilities visible in the urban space and forced the state to temporarily recognize and protect those who became seen as “victims.” It also questions the idea that xenophobia and failure to comply with international norms were responsible for the lack of protection of migrants and foreigners. Rather, it is the kind of protection displayed, restricted to the “most vulnerable,” that failed to address the root causes of the violence and envision broader social integration issues. The article provides further theorization on what it means to treat violence as disaster and points out to the need to envisage critically humanitarian and social assistance by including them in broader welfare patterns. https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/3068 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lydie Cabane |
spellingShingle |
Lydie Cabane Protecting the “Most Vulnerable”? The Management of a Disaster and the Making/Unmaking of Victims after the 2008 Xenophobic Violence in South Africa International Journal of Conflict and Violence |
author_facet |
Lydie Cabane |
author_sort |
Lydie Cabane |
title |
Protecting the “Most Vulnerable”? The Management of a Disaster and the Making/Unmaking of Victims after the 2008 Xenophobic Violence in South Africa |
title_short |
Protecting the “Most Vulnerable”? The Management of a Disaster and the Making/Unmaking of Victims after the 2008 Xenophobic Violence in South Africa |
title_full |
Protecting the “Most Vulnerable”? The Management of a Disaster and the Making/Unmaking of Victims after the 2008 Xenophobic Violence in South Africa |
title_fullStr |
Protecting the “Most Vulnerable”? The Management of a Disaster and the Making/Unmaking of Victims after the 2008 Xenophobic Violence in South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Protecting the “Most Vulnerable”? The Management of a Disaster and the Making/Unmaking of Victims after the 2008 Xenophobic Violence in South Africa |
title_sort |
protecting the “most vulnerable”? the management of a disaster and the making/unmaking of victims after the 2008 xenophobic violence in south africa |
publisher |
University of Bielefeld |
series |
International Journal of Conflict and Violence |
issn |
1864-1385 |
publishDate |
2016-04-01 |
description |
In 2008, South Africa witnessed a bout of xenophobic violence, requiring the state to declare a disaster to manage a massive displacement of migrants and foreigners. How did the South African state come to care for these populations, whereas it had previously sought to avoid providing protection to foreigners, and was seen as responsible for fostering xenophobia, if not violence? Analyzing the management of the disaster at the local level (in Cape Town), and the various discourses and mobilizations involved in it, this article shows how widespread violence and displacement rendered migrant vulnerabilities visible in the urban space and forced the state to temporarily recognize and protect those who became seen as “victims.” It also questions the idea that xenophobia and failure to comply with international norms were responsible for the lack of protection of migrants and foreigners. Rather, it is the kind of protection displayed, restricted to the “most vulnerable,” that failed to address the root causes of the violence and envision broader social integration issues. The article provides further theorization on what it means to treat violence as disaster and points out to the need to envisage critically humanitarian and social assistance by including them in broader welfare patterns.
|
url |
https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/3068 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lydiecabane protectingthemostvulnerablethemanagementofadisasterandthemakingunmakingofvictimsafterthe2008xenophobicviolenceinsouthafrica |
_version_ |
1724783346803802112 |