Managing gardens for wildlife: Features that predict mammal presence and abundance in gardens vary seasonally

Abstract Residential gardens in urban areas offer substantial opportunities for biodiversity conservation. To realize this opportunity, a comprehensive understanding of which species prosper in gardens, which mechanisms promote their use of these green spaces and how these mechanisms can be manipula...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bronte E. Van Helden, Paul G. Close, Barbara A. Stewart, Peter C. Speldewinde
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-03-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3453
id doaj-84368e9094f4434cac65aed4aba093f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-84368e9094f4434cac65aed4aba093f62021-04-18T21:00:39ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252021-03-01123n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.3453Managing gardens for wildlife: Features that predict mammal presence and abundance in gardens vary seasonallyBronte E. Van Helden0Paul G. Close1Barbara A. Stewart2Peter C. Speldewinde3Centre for Natural Resource Management & UWA School of Agriculture and Environment The University of Western Australia Albany Western Australia6330AustraliaCentre for Natural Resource Management & UWA School of Agriculture and Environment The University of Western Australia Albany Western Australia6330AustraliaCentre for Natural Resource Management & UWA School of Agriculture and Environment The University of Western Australia Albany Western Australia6330AustraliaCentre for Natural Resource Management & UWA School of Agriculture and Environment The University of Western Australia Albany Western Australia6330AustraliaAbstract Residential gardens in urban areas offer substantial opportunities for biodiversity conservation. To realize this opportunity, a comprehensive understanding of which species prosper in gardens, which mechanisms promote their use of these green spaces and how these mechanisms can be manipulated by residents to achieve conservation outcomes, is needed. While substantial progress has been made in evaluating the mechanisms that influence the diversity, presence, and abundance of wildlife in gardens, how these mechanisms vary seasonally is largely unknown. This study investigated whether the garden features influencing the presence and/or abundance of arboreal, flying, and ground‐dwelling mammals in gardens varied seasonally using acoustic, trapping, and spotlighting surveys undertaken in four consecutive seasons (2018/19) in 52 gardens in southwestern Australia. As animal behavior and resource availability varies seasonally, we predicted that garden features influencing the presence and abundance of mammals in gardens would also vary seasonally. For arboreal and ground‐dwelling mammals, we found that some garden features (e.g., canopy cover and presence of dogs, respectively) were important in more than one season; however, none were important in all seasons with most only being influential in one. No garden features predicted the presence of flying mammals in more than one season. Our results suggest that sampling in a single or few seasons may fail to identify features influencing wildlife at times other than in the season of sampling, or alternatively, may overemphasize factors that do not operate across all seasons. Studies that consider the mechanisms on a seasonal basis will provide a more comprehensive list of features influencing the presence and abundance of animals in gardens. We suggest it is both those features that support wildlife in multiple or all seasons, and those that support critical life‐history events in a single season that could contribute to conservation if manipulated by residents appropriately.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3453conservationmammalsmechanismsnovel ecosystemsresidential gardensseasonality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bronte E. Van Helden
Paul G. Close
Barbara A. Stewart
Peter C. Speldewinde
spellingShingle Bronte E. Van Helden
Paul G. Close
Barbara A. Stewart
Peter C. Speldewinde
Managing gardens for wildlife: Features that predict mammal presence and abundance in gardens vary seasonally
Ecosphere
conservation
mammals
mechanisms
novel ecosystems
residential gardens
seasonality
author_facet Bronte E. Van Helden
Paul G. Close
Barbara A. Stewart
Peter C. Speldewinde
author_sort Bronte E. Van Helden
title Managing gardens for wildlife: Features that predict mammal presence and abundance in gardens vary seasonally
title_short Managing gardens for wildlife: Features that predict mammal presence and abundance in gardens vary seasonally
title_full Managing gardens for wildlife: Features that predict mammal presence and abundance in gardens vary seasonally
title_fullStr Managing gardens for wildlife: Features that predict mammal presence and abundance in gardens vary seasonally
title_full_unstemmed Managing gardens for wildlife: Features that predict mammal presence and abundance in gardens vary seasonally
title_sort managing gardens for wildlife: features that predict mammal presence and abundance in gardens vary seasonally
publisher Wiley
series Ecosphere
issn 2150-8925
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Residential gardens in urban areas offer substantial opportunities for biodiversity conservation. To realize this opportunity, a comprehensive understanding of which species prosper in gardens, which mechanisms promote their use of these green spaces and how these mechanisms can be manipulated by residents to achieve conservation outcomes, is needed. While substantial progress has been made in evaluating the mechanisms that influence the diversity, presence, and abundance of wildlife in gardens, how these mechanisms vary seasonally is largely unknown. This study investigated whether the garden features influencing the presence and/or abundance of arboreal, flying, and ground‐dwelling mammals in gardens varied seasonally using acoustic, trapping, and spotlighting surveys undertaken in four consecutive seasons (2018/19) in 52 gardens in southwestern Australia. As animal behavior and resource availability varies seasonally, we predicted that garden features influencing the presence and abundance of mammals in gardens would also vary seasonally. For arboreal and ground‐dwelling mammals, we found that some garden features (e.g., canopy cover and presence of dogs, respectively) were important in more than one season; however, none were important in all seasons with most only being influential in one. No garden features predicted the presence of flying mammals in more than one season. Our results suggest that sampling in a single or few seasons may fail to identify features influencing wildlife at times other than in the season of sampling, or alternatively, may overemphasize factors that do not operate across all seasons. Studies that consider the mechanisms on a seasonal basis will provide a more comprehensive list of features influencing the presence and abundance of animals in gardens. We suggest it is both those features that support wildlife in multiple or all seasons, and those that support critical life‐history events in a single season that could contribute to conservation if manipulated by residents appropriately.
topic conservation
mammals
mechanisms
novel ecosystems
residential gardens
seasonality
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3453
work_keys_str_mv AT bronteevanhelden managinggardensforwildlifefeaturesthatpredictmammalpresenceandabundanceingardensvaryseasonally
AT paulgclose managinggardensforwildlifefeaturesthatpredictmammalpresenceandabundanceingardensvaryseasonally
AT barbaraastewart managinggardensforwildlifefeaturesthatpredictmammalpresenceandabundanceingardensvaryseasonally
AT petercspeldewinde managinggardensforwildlifefeaturesthatpredictmammalpresenceandabundanceingardensvaryseasonally
_version_ 1721521704600076288