Out With The Old, In With The New: A Nuanced Approach To Self-Stigma Among Veterans

Self-stigma can generate significant public health costs because of its implications concerning underutilization of treatment. Veterans are particularly vulnerable to the effects of self-stigma because of the military’s value of self-reliance, which may compound negative feelings toward receiving tr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Derrick Alan Kranke, Shant Barmak, Aram Dobalian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Virginia Tech Libraries 2019-03-01
Series:Journal of Veterans Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal-veterans-studies.org/articles/78
id doaj-842260ec8f9d4419812325b219827e17
record_format Article
spelling doaj-842260ec8f9d4419812325b219827e172020-11-25T03:38:46ZengVirginia Tech LibrariesJournal of Veterans Studies 2470-47682019-03-014112813810.21061/jvs.v4i1.7878Out With The Old, In With The New: A Nuanced Approach To Self-Stigma Among VeteransDerrick Alan Kranke0Shant Barmak1Aram Dobalian2Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, Department of Veteran AffairsPrivate PracticeDepartment of Veteran AffairsSelf-stigma can generate significant public health costs because of its implications concerning underutilization of treatment. Veterans are particularly vulnerable to the effects of self-stigma because of the military’s value of self-reliance, which may compound negative feelings toward receiving treatment. Few intervention studies to reduce veteran self-stigma apply the Corrigan and Watson (2002) model of self-stigma to the veteran experience. Doing so may yield additional insight into factors driving self-stigma. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to apply this model to veterans from recent generations of war. The authors conducted a constant-comparative method between the Corrigan and Watson self-stigma model and a variation of a stigma model among military personnel with mental illness to identify similarities, differences, and any unaccounted factors. Contextual factors, such as identify development, military cultural values, and family concerns, that have been noted in recent research as factors impacting stigma, were not accounted for in the Corrigan and Watson model. The proposed model encompasses those nuanced contextual factors. The newly proposed model and underlying reasons for behaviors differed from the Corrigan and Watson self-stigma framework regarding the following components: 1) resistance; 2) differentiate; and 3) protect. The model is meant to disseminate novel issues that compound the effects of veteran self-stigma. Future research needs to assess the adequacy of this model, and if it is consistent with the lived experience of veterans, develop interventions that target the corresponding issues within each component.https://journal-veterans-studies.org/articles/78veterans, self-stigma, mental illness, identity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Derrick Alan Kranke
Shant Barmak
Aram Dobalian
spellingShingle Derrick Alan Kranke
Shant Barmak
Aram Dobalian
Out With The Old, In With The New: A Nuanced Approach To Self-Stigma Among Veterans
Journal of Veterans Studies
veterans, self-stigma, mental illness, identity
author_facet Derrick Alan Kranke
Shant Barmak
Aram Dobalian
author_sort Derrick Alan Kranke
title Out With The Old, In With The New: A Nuanced Approach To Self-Stigma Among Veterans
title_short Out With The Old, In With The New: A Nuanced Approach To Self-Stigma Among Veterans
title_full Out With The Old, In With The New: A Nuanced Approach To Self-Stigma Among Veterans
title_fullStr Out With The Old, In With The New: A Nuanced Approach To Self-Stigma Among Veterans
title_full_unstemmed Out With The Old, In With The New: A Nuanced Approach To Self-Stigma Among Veterans
title_sort out with the old, in with the new: a nuanced approach to self-stigma among veterans
publisher Virginia Tech Libraries
series Journal of Veterans Studies
issn 2470-4768
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Self-stigma can generate significant public health costs because of its implications concerning underutilization of treatment. Veterans are particularly vulnerable to the effects of self-stigma because of the military’s value of self-reliance, which may compound negative feelings toward receiving treatment. Few intervention studies to reduce veteran self-stigma apply the Corrigan and Watson (2002) model of self-stigma to the veteran experience. Doing so may yield additional insight into factors driving self-stigma. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to apply this model to veterans from recent generations of war. The authors conducted a constant-comparative method between the Corrigan and Watson self-stigma model and a variation of a stigma model among military personnel with mental illness to identify similarities, differences, and any unaccounted factors. Contextual factors, such as identify development, military cultural values, and family concerns, that have been noted in recent research as factors impacting stigma, were not accounted for in the Corrigan and Watson model. The proposed model encompasses those nuanced contextual factors. The newly proposed model and underlying reasons for behaviors differed from the Corrigan and Watson self-stigma framework regarding the following components: 1) resistance; 2) differentiate; and 3) protect. The model is meant to disseminate novel issues that compound the effects of veteran self-stigma. Future research needs to assess the adequacy of this model, and if it is consistent with the lived experience of veterans, develop interventions that target the corresponding issues within each component.
topic veterans, self-stigma, mental illness, identity
url https://journal-veterans-studies.org/articles/78
work_keys_str_mv AT derrickalankranke outwiththeoldinwiththenewanuancedapproachtoselfstigmaamongveterans
AT shantbarmak outwiththeoldinwiththenewanuancedapproachtoselfstigmaamongveterans
AT aramdobalian outwiththeoldinwiththenewanuancedapproachtoselfstigmaamongveterans
_version_ 1724540640763576320