The best of both worlds: A combined approach for analyzing microalgal diversity via metabarcoding and morphology-based methods.

An increasing number of studies use next generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze complex communities, but is the method sensitive enough when it comes to identification and quantification of species? We compared NGS with morphology-based identification methods in an analysis of microalgal (periphyton...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sophie Groendahl, Maria Kahlert, Patrick Fink
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5325584?pdf=render
id doaj-8407c821f89748a4b8d1cc9e1a85ddfa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8407c821f89748a4b8d1cc9e1a85ddfa2020-11-24T21:35:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01122e017280810.1371/journal.pone.0172808The best of both worlds: A combined approach for analyzing microalgal diversity via metabarcoding and morphology-based methods.Sophie GroendahlMaria KahlertPatrick FinkAn increasing number of studies use next generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze complex communities, but is the method sensitive enough when it comes to identification and quantification of species? We compared NGS with morphology-based identification methods in an analysis of microalgal (periphyton) communities. We conducted a mesocosm experiment in which we allowed two benthic grazer species to feed upon benthic biofilms, which resulted in altered periphyton communities. Morphology-based identification and 454 (Roche) pyrosequencing of the V4 region in the small ribosomal unit (18S) rDNA gene were used to investigate the community change caused by grazing. Both the NGS-based data and the morphology-based method detected a marked shift in the biofilm composition, though the two methods varied strongly in their abilities to detect and quantify specific taxa, and neither method was able to detect all species in the biofilms. For quantitative analysis, we therefore recommend using both metabarcoding and microscopic identification when assessing the community composition of eukaryotic microorganisms.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5325584?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sophie Groendahl
Maria Kahlert
Patrick Fink
spellingShingle Sophie Groendahl
Maria Kahlert
Patrick Fink
The best of both worlds: A combined approach for analyzing microalgal diversity via metabarcoding and morphology-based methods.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Sophie Groendahl
Maria Kahlert
Patrick Fink
author_sort Sophie Groendahl
title The best of both worlds: A combined approach for analyzing microalgal diversity via metabarcoding and morphology-based methods.
title_short The best of both worlds: A combined approach for analyzing microalgal diversity via metabarcoding and morphology-based methods.
title_full The best of both worlds: A combined approach for analyzing microalgal diversity via metabarcoding and morphology-based methods.
title_fullStr The best of both worlds: A combined approach for analyzing microalgal diversity via metabarcoding and morphology-based methods.
title_full_unstemmed The best of both worlds: A combined approach for analyzing microalgal diversity via metabarcoding and morphology-based methods.
title_sort best of both worlds: a combined approach for analyzing microalgal diversity via metabarcoding and morphology-based methods.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description An increasing number of studies use next generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze complex communities, but is the method sensitive enough when it comes to identification and quantification of species? We compared NGS with morphology-based identification methods in an analysis of microalgal (periphyton) communities. We conducted a mesocosm experiment in which we allowed two benthic grazer species to feed upon benthic biofilms, which resulted in altered periphyton communities. Morphology-based identification and 454 (Roche) pyrosequencing of the V4 region in the small ribosomal unit (18S) rDNA gene were used to investigate the community change caused by grazing. Both the NGS-based data and the morphology-based method detected a marked shift in the biofilm composition, though the two methods varied strongly in their abilities to detect and quantify specific taxa, and neither method was able to detect all species in the biofilms. For quantitative analysis, we therefore recommend using both metabarcoding and microscopic identification when assessing the community composition of eukaryotic microorganisms.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5325584?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sophiegroendahl thebestofbothworldsacombinedapproachforanalyzingmicroalgaldiversityviametabarcodingandmorphologybasedmethods
AT mariakahlert thebestofbothworldsacombinedapproachforanalyzingmicroalgaldiversityviametabarcodingandmorphologybasedmethods
AT patrickfink thebestofbothworldsacombinedapproachforanalyzingmicroalgaldiversityviametabarcodingandmorphologybasedmethods
AT sophiegroendahl bestofbothworldsacombinedapproachforanalyzingmicroalgaldiversityviametabarcodingandmorphologybasedmethods
AT mariakahlert bestofbothworldsacombinedapproachforanalyzingmicroalgaldiversityviametabarcodingandmorphologybasedmethods
AT patrickfink bestofbothworldsacombinedapproachforanalyzingmicroalgaldiversityviametabarcodingandmorphologybasedmethods
_version_ 1725944812281004032