Risk-free Yields, Risk Aversion, and Volatility

The classic approach to risk analysis is rooted in the belief that risk aversion is constant, determined by constant preferences. It is becoming clear that this proposition is no longer acceptable. Risk aversion can change over short time, between sovereign countries, and on different financial and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Samih Antoine Azar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EconJournals 2017-09-01
Series:International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijefi/issue/32021/354206?publisher=http-www-cag-edu-tr-ilhan-ozturk
id doaj-83eaa8eef2d14ff19f43ab0d9be6f88c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83eaa8eef2d14ff19f43ab0d9be6f88c2020-11-25T01:13:29ZengEconJournalsInternational Journal of Economics and Financial Issues2146-41382017-09-01731051121032Risk-free Yields, Risk Aversion, and VolatilitySamih Antoine AzarThe classic approach to risk analysis is rooted in the belief that risk aversion is constant, determined by constant preferences. It is becoming clear that this proposition is no longer acceptable. Risk aversion can change over short time, between sovereign countries, and on different financial and capital assets. Secondly volatility of asset prices is itself variable, and can be apprehended like the VIX volatility index which is so popular. Risk-free yields are affected by this variability in aversion and volatility, contrary to what is commonly envisioned, and contrary to what intuition suggests. This paper assumes complete markets, and simulates 14 values for the volatility, and 25 values for the coefficient of relative risk aversion (CRRA), and it measures the impact of these changes on the risk-free yield. One conclusion is that the CRRA is indeterminate, and is therefore consistent with the many different estimates in the literature. Another conclusion is that, by setting the volatility to 17.5%, roughly the average stock market volatility over a long period, there is evidence that the range of the implied risk premiums correspond to the range in the empirical literature.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijefi/issue/32021/354206?publisher=http-www-cag-edu-tr-ilhan-ozturkrisk aversion volatility risk-free yields consumption strata simulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Samih Antoine Azar
spellingShingle Samih Antoine Azar
Risk-free Yields, Risk Aversion, and Volatility
International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues
risk aversion
volatility
risk-free yields
consumption strata
simulation
author_facet Samih Antoine Azar
author_sort Samih Antoine Azar
title Risk-free Yields, Risk Aversion, and Volatility
title_short Risk-free Yields, Risk Aversion, and Volatility
title_full Risk-free Yields, Risk Aversion, and Volatility
title_fullStr Risk-free Yields, Risk Aversion, and Volatility
title_full_unstemmed Risk-free Yields, Risk Aversion, and Volatility
title_sort risk-free yields, risk aversion, and volatility
publisher EconJournals
series International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues
issn 2146-4138
publishDate 2017-09-01
description The classic approach to risk analysis is rooted in the belief that risk aversion is constant, determined by constant preferences. It is becoming clear that this proposition is no longer acceptable. Risk aversion can change over short time, between sovereign countries, and on different financial and capital assets. Secondly volatility of asset prices is itself variable, and can be apprehended like the VIX volatility index which is so popular. Risk-free yields are affected by this variability in aversion and volatility, contrary to what is commonly envisioned, and contrary to what intuition suggests. This paper assumes complete markets, and simulates 14 values for the volatility, and 25 values for the coefficient of relative risk aversion (CRRA), and it measures the impact of these changes on the risk-free yield. One conclusion is that the CRRA is indeterminate, and is therefore consistent with the many different estimates in the literature. Another conclusion is that, by setting the volatility to 17.5%, roughly the average stock market volatility over a long period, there is evidence that the range of the implied risk premiums correspond to the range in the empirical literature.
topic risk aversion
volatility
risk-free yields
consumption strata
simulation
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijefi/issue/32021/354206?publisher=http-www-cag-edu-tr-ilhan-ozturk
work_keys_str_mv AT samihantoineazar riskfreeyieldsriskaversionandvolatility
_version_ 1725161921650360320