Development of South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system 2011−2014

There is a growing recognition of the complex relationship between evaluation and research, and policy and practice. Policy making is inherently political, and public administration is contingent on various factors, that is budgets, capabilities and systems other than evidence. This has evolved in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matodzi M. Amisi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2015-08-01
Series:African Evaluation Journal
Online Access:https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/109
id doaj-83e1b25540174c6c8145bedbc76fd677
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83e1b25540174c6c8145bedbc76fd6772020-11-24T23:16:18ZengAOSISAfrican Evaluation Journal2310-49882306-51332015-08-0131e1e710.4102/aej.v3i1.10934Development of South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system 2011−2014Matodzi M. Amisi0Department of Planning, Monitoring and EvaluationsThere is a growing recognition of the complex relationship between evaluation and research, and policy and practice. Policy making is inherently political, and public administration is contingent on various factors, that is budgets, capabilities and systems other than evidence. This has evolved in the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluations (DPME) in South Africa challenging conventional ideas of communication between evaluators and policymakers and practitioners. These are characterised by monologues from evaluators to policymakers and practitioners, which are reserved exclusively for communicating the finished product. This article is a reflection of the emerging work of the DPME valuations which is investigating the relational dynamics between evaluators and programme personnel, and encouraging more interactive and diversified communication throughout the evaluation process. The article offers a public sector observation. The lessons and implications can be useful, firstly to other countries establishing evaluation systems, and also those who have an interest in enhancing the use of evidence by government agencies in developing countries.https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/109
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matodzi M. Amisi
spellingShingle Matodzi M. Amisi
Development of South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system 2011−2014
African Evaluation Journal
author_facet Matodzi M. Amisi
author_sort Matodzi M. Amisi
title Development of South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system 2011−2014
title_short Development of South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system 2011−2014
title_full Development of South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system 2011−2014
title_fullStr Development of South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system 2011−2014
title_full_unstemmed Development of South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system 2011−2014
title_sort development of south africa’s national evaluation policy and system 2011−2014
publisher AOSIS
series African Evaluation Journal
issn 2310-4988
2306-5133
publishDate 2015-08-01
description There is a growing recognition of the complex relationship between evaluation and research, and policy and practice. Policy making is inherently political, and public administration is contingent on various factors, that is budgets, capabilities and systems other than evidence. This has evolved in the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluations (DPME) in South Africa challenging conventional ideas of communication between evaluators and policymakers and practitioners. These are characterised by monologues from evaluators to policymakers and practitioners, which are reserved exclusively for communicating the finished product. This article is a reflection of the emerging work of the DPME valuations which is investigating the relational dynamics between evaluators and programme personnel, and encouraging more interactive and diversified communication throughout the evaluation process. The article offers a public sector observation. The lessons and implications can be useful, firstly to other countries establishing evaluation systems, and also those who have an interest in enhancing the use of evidence by government agencies in developing countries.
url https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/109
work_keys_str_mv AT matodzimamisi developmentofsouthafricasnationalevaluationpolicyandsystem20112014
_version_ 1725587620041326592