Benchmark Comparison of High Voltage Discharge Separation of Photovoltaic Modules by Electrohydraulic and Electrodynamic Fragmentation

Recent years have seen an increasing interest in exploring alternative techniques to conventional grinding methods such as fragmentation by high voltage discharges. Although pulsed power has already been applied to break down complex composite materials, there is currently no systematic comparison b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fadri Pestalozzi, Stefan Eisert, Jörg Woidasky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-04-01
Series:Recycling
Subjects:
CIS
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/3/2/13
id doaj-83e07c9275774e22bc73a0a7a65bb896
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83e07c9275774e22bc73a0a7a65bb8962020-11-25T02:51:27ZengMDPI AGRecycling2313-43212018-04-013213010.3390/recycling3020013recycling3020013Benchmark Comparison of High Voltage Discharge Separation of Photovoltaic Modules by Electrohydraulic and Electrodynamic FragmentationFadri Pestalozzi0Stefan Eisert1Jörg Woidasky2Pforzheim University of Applied Sciences, School of Engineering, 75175 Pforzheim, Baden-Württemberg, GermanyImpulsTec GmbH, 01129 Dresden, Sachsen, GermanyPforzheim University of Applied Sciences, School of Engineering, 75175 Pforzheim, Baden-Württemberg, GermanyRecent years have seen an increasing interest in exploring alternative techniques to conventional grinding methods such as fragmentation by high voltage discharges. Although pulsed power has already been applied to break down complex composite materials, there is currently no systematic comparison between different types of discharge regimes such as electrohydraulic and electrodynamic fragmentation. The aim of this work is to present such a comparison based on the electrohydraulic and electrodynamic fragmentation of copper indium diselenide (CIS) photovoltaic modules for potential indium recovery. High voltage discharges are performed in a process vessel filled with demineralized water at ambient conditions. After fragmentation, individual fractions are weighed, milled and the indium content is determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF). Both the electrohydraulic and the electrodynamic approach are suitable to efficiently separate thin-film photovoltaic composite material into its constituent layers. The separation result is not dependent on the voltage level, but only on the total pulse energy applied. Since the generation of discharges with higher voltages requires a higher investment into plant properties such as insulation and generator, a comminution at lower voltages, i.e., electrohydraulic fragmentation, is preferable to electrodynamic fragmentation at higher voltages. To reveal the specific strengths of the two processes compared here, further comparative work with different composite materials is required.http://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/3/2/13pulsed powerhigh voltage dischargefragmentationelectrohydraulicelectrodynamiccomparisonbenchmarkthin-film photovoltaicCISindium recovery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fadri Pestalozzi
Stefan Eisert
Jörg Woidasky
spellingShingle Fadri Pestalozzi
Stefan Eisert
Jörg Woidasky
Benchmark Comparison of High Voltage Discharge Separation of Photovoltaic Modules by Electrohydraulic and Electrodynamic Fragmentation
Recycling
pulsed power
high voltage discharge
fragmentation
electrohydraulic
electrodynamic
comparison
benchmark
thin-film photovoltaic
CIS
indium recovery
author_facet Fadri Pestalozzi
Stefan Eisert
Jörg Woidasky
author_sort Fadri Pestalozzi
title Benchmark Comparison of High Voltage Discharge Separation of Photovoltaic Modules by Electrohydraulic and Electrodynamic Fragmentation
title_short Benchmark Comparison of High Voltage Discharge Separation of Photovoltaic Modules by Electrohydraulic and Electrodynamic Fragmentation
title_full Benchmark Comparison of High Voltage Discharge Separation of Photovoltaic Modules by Electrohydraulic and Electrodynamic Fragmentation
title_fullStr Benchmark Comparison of High Voltage Discharge Separation of Photovoltaic Modules by Electrohydraulic and Electrodynamic Fragmentation
title_full_unstemmed Benchmark Comparison of High Voltage Discharge Separation of Photovoltaic Modules by Electrohydraulic and Electrodynamic Fragmentation
title_sort benchmark comparison of high voltage discharge separation of photovoltaic modules by electrohydraulic and electrodynamic fragmentation
publisher MDPI AG
series Recycling
issn 2313-4321
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Recent years have seen an increasing interest in exploring alternative techniques to conventional grinding methods such as fragmentation by high voltage discharges. Although pulsed power has already been applied to break down complex composite materials, there is currently no systematic comparison between different types of discharge regimes such as electrohydraulic and electrodynamic fragmentation. The aim of this work is to present such a comparison based on the electrohydraulic and electrodynamic fragmentation of copper indium diselenide (CIS) photovoltaic modules for potential indium recovery. High voltage discharges are performed in a process vessel filled with demineralized water at ambient conditions. After fragmentation, individual fractions are weighed, milled and the indium content is determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF). Both the electrohydraulic and the electrodynamic approach are suitable to efficiently separate thin-film photovoltaic composite material into its constituent layers. The separation result is not dependent on the voltage level, but only on the total pulse energy applied. Since the generation of discharges with higher voltages requires a higher investment into plant properties such as insulation and generator, a comminution at lower voltages, i.e., electrohydraulic fragmentation, is preferable to electrodynamic fragmentation at higher voltages. To reveal the specific strengths of the two processes compared here, further comparative work with different composite materials is required.
topic pulsed power
high voltage discharge
fragmentation
electrohydraulic
electrodynamic
comparison
benchmark
thin-film photovoltaic
CIS
indium recovery
url http://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/3/2/13
work_keys_str_mv AT fadripestalozzi benchmarkcomparisonofhighvoltagedischargeseparationofphotovoltaicmodulesbyelectrohydraulicandelectrodynamicfragmentation
AT stefaneisert benchmarkcomparisonofhighvoltagedischargeseparationofphotovoltaicmodulesbyelectrohydraulicandelectrodynamicfragmentation
AT jorgwoidasky benchmarkcomparisonofhighvoltagedischargeseparationofphotovoltaicmodulesbyelectrohydraulicandelectrodynamicfragmentation
_version_ 1724734468331143168