A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical

In this paper a cross-shaped isolator consisting of cuboidal magnets and a cylindrical isolator are compared by resonance frequency to volume ratio and shape. Both isolators are capable of obtaining a low resonance frequency, i.e. 0.15 Hz and 0.01 Hz for the cross and cylinder, respectively. The vol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Van Casteren D.T.E.H., Paulides J.J.H., Lomonova E.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Polish Academy of Sciences 2015-12-01
Series:Archives of Electrical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/aee.2015.64.issue-4/aee-2015-0044/aee-2015-0044.xml?format=INT
id doaj-83db3bd499ab4646bdf18164c4ed68de
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83db3bd499ab4646bdf18164c4ed68de2020-11-25T03:46:33ZengPolish Academy of SciencesArchives of Electrical Engineering2300-25062015-12-0164459360410.1515/aee-2015-0044aee-2015-0044A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practicalVan Casteren D.T.E.H.0Paulides J.J.H.1Lomonova E.A.2Eindhoven University of Technology Electromechanics and Power Electronics group Den Dolech 2, 5600MB Eindhoven, The NetherlandsUniversity of Technology Electromechanics and Power Electronics group Den Dolech 2, 5600MB Eindhoven, The NetherlandsEindhoven University of Technology Electromechanics and Power Electronics group Den Dolech 2, 5600MB Eindhoven, The NetherlandsIn this paper a cross-shaped isolator consisting of cuboidal magnets and a cylindrical isolator are compared by resonance frequency to volume ratio and shape. Both isolators are capable of obtaining a low resonance frequency, i.e. 0.15 Hz and 0.01 Hz for the cross and cylinder, respectively. The volume of both isolators is comparable, only the shape is different, resulting in a tall structure with a small footprint for the cross and a flat with a large diameter cylindrical structure. A sensitivity analysis shows that due to the large amount of magnets, the cross-shaped isolator is less sensitive to manufacturing toleranceshttp://www.degruyter.com/view/j/aee.2015.64.issue-4/aee-2015-0044/aee-2015-0044.xml?format=INTGravity compensationmagneticvibration isolation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Van Casteren D.T.E.H.
Paulides J.J.H.
Lomonova E.A.
spellingShingle Van Casteren D.T.E.H.
Paulides J.J.H.
Lomonova E.A.
A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical
Archives of Electrical Engineering
Gravity compensation
magnetic
vibration isolation
author_facet Van Casteren D.T.E.H.
Paulides J.J.H.
Lomonova E.A.
author_sort Van Casteren D.T.E.H.
title A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical
title_short A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical
title_full A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical
title_fullStr A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical
title_sort comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical
publisher Polish Academy of Sciences
series Archives of Electrical Engineering
issn 2300-2506
publishDate 2015-12-01
description In this paper a cross-shaped isolator consisting of cuboidal magnets and a cylindrical isolator are compared by resonance frequency to volume ratio and shape. Both isolators are capable of obtaining a low resonance frequency, i.e. 0.15 Hz and 0.01 Hz for the cross and cylinder, respectively. The volume of both isolators is comparable, only the shape is different, resulting in a tall structure with a small footprint for the cross and a flat with a large diameter cylindrical structure. A sensitivity analysis shows that due to the large amount of magnets, the cross-shaped isolator is less sensitive to manufacturing tolerances
topic Gravity compensation
magnetic
vibration isolation
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/aee.2015.64.issue-4/aee-2015-0044/aee-2015-0044.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT vancasterendteh acomparisonbetweencylindricalandcrossshapedmagneticvibrationisolatorsidealandpractical
AT paulidesjjh acomparisonbetweencylindricalandcrossshapedmagneticvibrationisolatorsidealandpractical
AT lomonovaea acomparisonbetweencylindricalandcrossshapedmagneticvibrationisolatorsidealandpractical
AT vancasterendteh comparisonbetweencylindricalandcrossshapedmagneticvibrationisolatorsidealandpractical
AT paulidesjjh comparisonbetweencylindricalandcrossshapedmagneticvibrationisolatorsidealandpractical
AT lomonovaea comparisonbetweencylindricalandcrossshapedmagneticvibrationisolatorsidealandpractical
_version_ 1724505624105975808