A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical
In this paper a cross-shaped isolator consisting of cuboidal magnets and a cylindrical isolator are compared by resonance frequency to volume ratio and shape. Both isolators are capable of obtaining a low resonance frequency, i.e. 0.15 Hz and 0.01 Hz for the cross and cylinder, respectively. The vol...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Polish Academy of Sciences
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Archives of Electrical Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/aee.2015.64.issue-4/aee-2015-0044/aee-2015-0044.xml?format=INT |
id |
doaj-83db3bd499ab4646bdf18164c4ed68de |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-83db3bd499ab4646bdf18164c4ed68de2020-11-25T03:46:33ZengPolish Academy of SciencesArchives of Electrical Engineering2300-25062015-12-0164459360410.1515/aee-2015-0044aee-2015-0044A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practicalVan Casteren D.T.E.H.0Paulides J.J.H.1Lomonova E.A.2Eindhoven University of Technology Electromechanics and Power Electronics group Den Dolech 2, 5600MB Eindhoven, The NetherlandsUniversity of Technology Electromechanics and Power Electronics group Den Dolech 2, 5600MB Eindhoven, The NetherlandsEindhoven University of Technology Electromechanics and Power Electronics group Den Dolech 2, 5600MB Eindhoven, The NetherlandsIn this paper a cross-shaped isolator consisting of cuboidal magnets and a cylindrical isolator are compared by resonance frequency to volume ratio and shape. Both isolators are capable of obtaining a low resonance frequency, i.e. 0.15 Hz and 0.01 Hz for the cross and cylinder, respectively. The volume of both isolators is comparable, only the shape is different, resulting in a tall structure with a small footprint for the cross and a flat with a large diameter cylindrical structure. A sensitivity analysis shows that due to the large amount of magnets, the cross-shaped isolator is less sensitive to manufacturing toleranceshttp://www.degruyter.com/view/j/aee.2015.64.issue-4/aee-2015-0044/aee-2015-0044.xml?format=INTGravity compensationmagneticvibration isolation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Van Casteren D.T.E.H. Paulides J.J.H. Lomonova E.A. |
spellingShingle |
Van Casteren D.T.E.H. Paulides J.J.H. Lomonova E.A. A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical Archives of Electrical Engineering Gravity compensation magnetic vibration isolation |
author_facet |
Van Casteren D.T.E.H. Paulides J.J.H. Lomonova E.A. |
author_sort |
Van Casteren D.T.E.H. |
title |
A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical |
title_short |
A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical |
title_full |
A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical |
title_fullStr |
A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical |
title_sort |
comparison between cylindrical and cross-shaped magnetic vibration isolators: ideal and practical |
publisher |
Polish Academy of Sciences |
series |
Archives of Electrical Engineering |
issn |
2300-2506 |
publishDate |
2015-12-01 |
description |
In this paper a cross-shaped isolator consisting of cuboidal magnets and a cylindrical isolator are compared by resonance frequency to volume ratio and shape. Both isolators are capable of obtaining a low resonance frequency, i.e. 0.15 Hz and 0.01 Hz for the cross and cylinder, respectively. The volume of both isolators is comparable, only the shape is different, resulting in a tall structure with a small footprint for the cross and a flat with a large diameter cylindrical structure. A sensitivity analysis shows that due to the large amount of magnets, the cross-shaped isolator is less sensitive to manufacturing tolerances |
topic |
Gravity compensation magnetic vibration isolation |
url |
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/aee.2015.64.issue-4/aee-2015-0044/aee-2015-0044.xml?format=INT |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vancasterendteh acomparisonbetweencylindricalandcrossshapedmagneticvibrationisolatorsidealandpractical AT paulidesjjh acomparisonbetweencylindricalandcrossshapedmagneticvibrationisolatorsidealandpractical AT lomonovaea acomparisonbetweencylindricalandcrossshapedmagneticvibrationisolatorsidealandpractical AT vancasterendteh comparisonbetweencylindricalandcrossshapedmagneticvibrationisolatorsidealandpractical AT paulidesjjh comparisonbetweencylindricalandcrossshapedmagneticvibrationisolatorsidealandpractical AT lomonovaea comparisonbetweencylindricalandcrossshapedmagneticvibrationisolatorsidealandpractical |
_version_ |
1724505624105975808 |