Comparison of efficiency between platelet rich plasma and corticosteroid injection therapies in patients with Carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study

Abstract Background Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common upper limb entrapment neuropathy caused by compression of the median nerve as it traverses the wrist at the carpal tunnel. Objectives To compare the effect of single dose of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injected locally with that of c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noha Ali Hashim, Hala Ahmed Fathy, Marwa Mohammed Esawy, Marwa Ahmed Shabana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-06-01
Series:The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41983-020-00184-1
id doaj-83d02e28456f427b8a23a24e134c2b6a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83d02e28456f427b8a23a24e134c2b6a2020-11-25T03:20:06ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery1687-83292020-06-015611810.1186/s41983-020-00184-1Comparison of efficiency between platelet rich plasma and corticosteroid injection therapies in patients with Carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled studyNoha Ali Hashim0Hala Ahmed Fathy1Marwa Mohammed Esawy2Marwa Ahmed Shabana3Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig University, El-SharkiaDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig University, El-SharkiaDepartment of clinical pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, El-SharkiaDepartment of clinical pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, El-SharkiaAbstract Background Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common upper limb entrapment neuropathy caused by compression of the median nerve as it traverses the wrist at the carpal tunnel. Objectives To compare the effect of single dose of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injected locally with that of corticosteroid in patients with CTS. Subjects and methods A total of 60 patients with very mild to moderate unilateral CTS were recruited to the study. PRP was prepared via two centrifugation procedures. The patients were randomly divided into three groups PRP [i] group, PRP [ii] group, and a third group that received local corticosteroid injection (CS). The patients were followed up at 1.5 and 3 months by visual analog scale (VAS) for pain assessment. The severity and functional outcomes were evaluated through Boston CTS, and neurophysiological analyses were carried out. Results On comparing the PRP [i], PRP [ii], and CS groups, a statistically significant enhancement of all outcome variables was observed in both PRP groups at follow-up except VAS at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.073 and P = 0.068, respectively) in PRP [ii] group. Conclusion In CTS, PRP was a better treatment alternative with respect to pain and functional outcome. In addition, it was associated well with improved neurophysiological values than those observed after corticosteroid injection. Trial registration Zagazig University, ZU-IRB#5014. Registered 18 December 2018, http://www.IRB_123@medicine.zu.edu.eg. ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN16755281 ; 20 March 2020http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41983-020-00184-1Pain assessmentPlatelet-rich plasmaCorticosteroid injectionTreatment alternativeCarpal tunnel syndromeOutcome
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Noha Ali Hashim
Hala Ahmed Fathy
Marwa Mohammed Esawy
Marwa Ahmed Shabana
spellingShingle Noha Ali Hashim
Hala Ahmed Fathy
Marwa Mohammed Esawy
Marwa Ahmed Shabana
Comparison of efficiency between platelet rich plasma and corticosteroid injection therapies in patients with Carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
Pain assessment
Platelet-rich plasma
Corticosteroid injection
Treatment alternative
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Outcome
author_facet Noha Ali Hashim
Hala Ahmed Fathy
Marwa Mohammed Esawy
Marwa Ahmed Shabana
author_sort Noha Ali Hashim
title Comparison of efficiency between platelet rich plasma and corticosteroid injection therapies in patients with Carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study
title_short Comparison of efficiency between platelet rich plasma and corticosteroid injection therapies in patients with Carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study
title_full Comparison of efficiency between platelet rich plasma and corticosteroid injection therapies in patients with Carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Comparison of efficiency between platelet rich plasma and corticosteroid injection therapies in patients with Carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of efficiency between platelet rich plasma and corticosteroid injection therapies in patients with Carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study
title_sort comparison of efficiency between platelet rich plasma and corticosteroid injection therapies in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study
publisher SpringerOpen
series The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
issn 1687-8329
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Abstract Background Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common upper limb entrapment neuropathy caused by compression of the median nerve as it traverses the wrist at the carpal tunnel. Objectives To compare the effect of single dose of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injected locally with that of corticosteroid in patients with CTS. Subjects and methods A total of 60 patients with very mild to moderate unilateral CTS were recruited to the study. PRP was prepared via two centrifugation procedures. The patients were randomly divided into three groups PRP [i] group, PRP [ii] group, and a third group that received local corticosteroid injection (CS). The patients were followed up at 1.5 and 3 months by visual analog scale (VAS) for pain assessment. The severity and functional outcomes were evaluated through Boston CTS, and neurophysiological analyses were carried out. Results On comparing the PRP [i], PRP [ii], and CS groups, a statistically significant enhancement of all outcome variables was observed in both PRP groups at follow-up except VAS at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.073 and P = 0.068, respectively) in PRP [ii] group. Conclusion In CTS, PRP was a better treatment alternative with respect to pain and functional outcome. In addition, it was associated well with improved neurophysiological values than those observed after corticosteroid injection. Trial registration Zagazig University, ZU-IRB#5014. Registered 18 December 2018, http://www.IRB_123@medicine.zu.edu.eg. ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN16755281 ; 20 March 2020
topic Pain assessment
Platelet-rich plasma
Corticosteroid injection
Treatment alternative
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Outcome
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41983-020-00184-1
work_keys_str_mv AT nohaalihashim comparisonofefficiencybetweenplateletrichplasmaandcorticosteroidinjectiontherapiesinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndromeaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT halaahmedfathy comparisonofefficiencybetweenplateletrichplasmaandcorticosteroidinjectiontherapiesinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndromeaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT marwamohammedesawy comparisonofefficiencybetweenplateletrichplasmaandcorticosteroidinjectiontherapiesinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndromeaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT marwaahmedshabana comparisonofefficiencybetweenplateletrichplasmaandcorticosteroidinjectiontherapiesinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndromeaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
_version_ 1724619220026654720