Differing approaches to falls and fracture prevention between Australia and Colombia

Fernando Gomez,1,2 Carmen Lucia Curcio,1 Pushpa Suriyaarachchi,2 Oddom Demontiero,2 Gustavo Duque2 1Research Group on Geriatrics and Gerontology, International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics Collaborative Center, University of Caldas, Manizales, Colombia; 2Ageing Bone Research Program, Sy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gomez F, Curcio CL, Suriyaarachchi P, Demontiero O, Duque G
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2013-01-01
Series:Clinical Interventions in Aging
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/differing-approaches-to-falls-and-fracture-prevention-between-australi-peer-reviewed-article-CIA
id doaj-83ccab0009c74b2ab2aff6cee089b6f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83ccab0009c74b2ab2aff6cee089b6f22020-11-25T01:32:00ZengDove Medical PressClinical Interventions in Aging1178-19982013-01-01Volume 8616712023Differing approaches to falls and fracture prevention between Australia and ColombiaGomez FCurcio CLSuriyaarachchi PDemontiero ODuque GFernando Gomez,1,2 Carmen Lucia Curcio,1 Pushpa Suriyaarachchi,2 Oddom Demontiero,2 Gustavo Duque2 1Research Group on Geriatrics and Gerontology, International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics Collaborative Center, University of Caldas, Manizales, Colombia; 2Ageing Bone Research Program, Sydney Medical School Nepean, The University of Sydney, Penrith, Australia Abstract: Falls and fractures are major causes of morbidity and mortality in older people. More importantly, previous falls and/or fractures are the most important predictors of further events. Therefore, secondary prevention programs for falls and fractures are highly needed. However, the question is whether a secondary prevention model should focus on falls prevention alone or should be implemented in combination with fracture prevention. By comparing a falls prevention clinic in Manizales (Colombia) versus a falls and fracture prevention clinic in Sydney (Australia), the objective was to identify similarities and differences between these two programs and to propose an integrated model of care for secondary prevention of fall and fractures. A comparative study of services was performed using an internationally agreed taxonomy. Service provision was compared against benchmarks set by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and previous reports in the literature. Comparison included organization, administration, client characteristics, and interventions. Several similarities and a number of differences that could be easily unified into a single model are reported here. Similarities included population, a multidisciplinary team, and a multifactorial assessment and intervention. Differences were eligibility criteria, a bone health assessment component, and the therapeutic interventions most commonly used at each site. In Australia, bone health assessment is reinforced whereas in Colombia dizziness assessment and management is pivotal. The authors propose that falls clinic services should be operationally linked to osteoporosis services such as a "falls and fracture prevention clinic," which would facilitate a comprehensive intervention to prevent falls and fractures in older persons. Keywords: outpatient clinics, falls and fracture services, geriatric health services, secondary preventionhttps://www.dovepress.com/differing-approaches-to-falls-and-fracture-prevention-between-australi-peer-reviewed-article-CIAOutpatient clinicsfalls and fracture servicesgeriatric health servicessecondary prevention.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gomez F
Curcio CL
Suriyaarachchi P
Demontiero O
Duque G
spellingShingle Gomez F
Curcio CL
Suriyaarachchi P
Demontiero O
Duque G
Differing approaches to falls and fracture prevention between Australia and Colombia
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Outpatient clinics
falls and fracture services
geriatric health services
secondary prevention.
author_facet Gomez F
Curcio CL
Suriyaarachchi P
Demontiero O
Duque G
author_sort Gomez F
title Differing approaches to falls and fracture prevention between Australia and Colombia
title_short Differing approaches to falls and fracture prevention between Australia and Colombia
title_full Differing approaches to falls and fracture prevention between Australia and Colombia
title_fullStr Differing approaches to falls and fracture prevention between Australia and Colombia
title_full_unstemmed Differing approaches to falls and fracture prevention between Australia and Colombia
title_sort differing approaches to falls and fracture prevention between australia and colombia
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical Interventions in Aging
issn 1178-1998
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Fernando Gomez,1,2 Carmen Lucia Curcio,1 Pushpa Suriyaarachchi,2 Oddom Demontiero,2 Gustavo Duque2 1Research Group on Geriatrics and Gerontology, International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics Collaborative Center, University of Caldas, Manizales, Colombia; 2Ageing Bone Research Program, Sydney Medical School Nepean, The University of Sydney, Penrith, Australia Abstract: Falls and fractures are major causes of morbidity and mortality in older people. More importantly, previous falls and/or fractures are the most important predictors of further events. Therefore, secondary prevention programs for falls and fractures are highly needed. However, the question is whether a secondary prevention model should focus on falls prevention alone or should be implemented in combination with fracture prevention. By comparing a falls prevention clinic in Manizales (Colombia) versus a falls and fracture prevention clinic in Sydney (Australia), the objective was to identify similarities and differences between these two programs and to propose an integrated model of care for secondary prevention of fall and fractures. A comparative study of services was performed using an internationally agreed taxonomy. Service provision was compared against benchmarks set by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and previous reports in the literature. Comparison included organization, administration, client characteristics, and interventions. Several similarities and a number of differences that could be easily unified into a single model are reported here. Similarities included population, a multidisciplinary team, and a multifactorial assessment and intervention. Differences were eligibility criteria, a bone health assessment component, and the therapeutic interventions most commonly used at each site. In Australia, bone health assessment is reinforced whereas in Colombia dizziness assessment and management is pivotal. The authors propose that falls clinic services should be operationally linked to osteoporosis services such as a "falls and fracture prevention clinic," which would facilitate a comprehensive intervention to prevent falls and fractures in older persons. Keywords: outpatient clinics, falls and fracture services, geriatric health services, secondary prevention
topic Outpatient clinics
falls and fracture services
geriatric health services
secondary prevention.
url https://www.dovepress.com/differing-approaches-to-falls-and-fracture-prevention-between-australi-peer-reviewed-article-CIA
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezf differingapproachestofallsandfracturepreventionbetweenaustraliaandcolombia
AT curciocl differingapproachestofallsandfracturepreventionbetweenaustraliaandcolombia
AT suriyaarachchip differingapproachestofallsandfracturepreventionbetweenaustraliaandcolombia
AT demontieroo differingapproachestofallsandfracturepreventionbetweenaustraliaandcolombia
AT duqueg differingapproachestofallsandfracturepreventionbetweenaustraliaandcolombia
_version_ 1725083891711082496