Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses

Hedging and boosting are significant communicative resources to construe and attain persuasion in different fields and particular genres of academic writing. They are both two sides of the same coin in the sense that they both contribute to the persuasive import of academic communication....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vázquez Orta, Ignacio, Giner, Diana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Alicante 2009-11-01
Series:Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses
Online Access:https://raei.ua.es/article/view/2009-n22-writing-with-conviction-the-use-of-boosters-in-modelling-persuasion-in-academic-discourses
id doaj-83c687c25cff42dab2e709e9372ddc05
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83c687c25cff42dab2e709e9372ddc052020-11-25T01:22:55ZengUniversidad de AlicanteRevista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses0214-48082171-861X2009-11-012221910.14198/raei.2009.22.144736Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discoursesVázquez Orta, IgnacioGiner, Diana Hedging and boosting are significant communicative resources to construe and attain persuasion in different fields and particular genres of academic writing. They are both two sides of the same coin in the sense that they both contribute to the persuasive import of academic communication. Although boosting is a much less researched phenomenon than hedging, it is a key aspect of rhetorical persuasion in academic writing. This paper is devoted to the analysis of the use of boosters in a corpus of articles from three different disciplines (Marketing, Biology and Mechanical Engineering), and in this sense it is complementary to our previous article (Vázquez and Giner, 2008) in which we explored the use of epistemic markers used as hedges in the same corpus of RAs. Based on computer readable data, and combining quantitative and qualitative methods, the article argues that boosting deserves particular attention if we want to fully interpret the phenomenon of academic persuasion.https://raei.ua.es/article/view/2009-n22-writing-with-conviction-the-use-of-boosters-in-modelling-persuasion-in-academic-discourses
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vázquez Orta, Ignacio
Giner, Diana
spellingShingle Vázquez Orta, Ignacio
Giner, Diana
Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses
Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses
author_facet Vázquez Orta, Ignacio
Giner, Diana
author_sort Vázquez Orta, Ignacio
title Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses
title_short Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses
title_full Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses
title_fullStr Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses
title_full_unstemmed Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses
title_sort writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses
publisher Universidad de Alicante
series Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses
issn 0214-4808
2171-861X
publishDate 2009-11-01
description Hedging and boosting are significant communicative resources to construe and attain persuasion in different fields and particular genres of academic writing. They are both two sides of the same coin in the sense that they both contribute to the persuasive import of academic communication. Although boosting is a much less researched phenomenon than hedging, it is a key aspect of rhetorical persuasion in academic writing. This paper is devoted to the analysis of the use of boosters in a corpus of articles from three different disciplines (Marketing, Biology and Mechanical Engineering), and in this sense it is complementary to our previous article (Vázquez and Giner, 2008) in which we explored the use of epistemic markers used as hedges in the same corpus of RAs. Based on computer readable data, and combining quantitative and qualitative methods, the article argues that boosting deserves particular attention if we want to fully interpret the phenomenon of academic persuasion.
url https://raei.ua.es/article/view/2009-n22-writing-with-conviction-the-use-of-boosters-in-modelling-persuasion-in-academic-discourses
work_keys_str_mv AT vazquezortaignacio writingwithconvictiontheuseofboostersinmodellingpersuasioninacademicdiscourses
AT ginerdiana writingwithconvictiontheuseofboostersinmodellingpersuasioninacademicdiscourses
_version_ 1725124644788240384