Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses
Hedging and boosting are significant communicative resources to construe and attain persuasion in different fields and particular genres of academic writing. They are both two sides of the same coin in the sense that they both contribute to the persuasive import of academic communication....
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad de Alicante
2009-11-01
|
Series: | Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses |
Online Access: | https://raei.ua.es/article/view/2009-n22-writing-with-conviction-the-use-of-boosters-in-modelling-persuasion-in-academic-discourses |
id |
doaj-83c687c25cff42dab2e709e9372ddc05 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-83c687c25cff42dab2e709e9372ddc052020-11-25T01:22:55ZengUniversidad de AlicanteRevista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses0214-48082171-861X2009-11-012221910.14198/raei.2009.22.144736Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discoursesVázquez Orta, IgnacioGiner, Diana Hedging and boosting are significant communicative resources to construe and attain persuasion in different fields and particular genres of academic writing. They are both two sides of the same coin in the sense that they both contribute to the persuasive import of academic communication. Although boosting is a much less researched phenomenon than hedging, it is a key aspect of rhetorical persuasion in academic writing. This paper is devoted to the analysis of the use of boosters in a corpus of articles from three different disciplines (Marketing, Biology and Mechanical Engineering), and in this sense it is complementary to our previous article (Vázquez and Giner, 2008) in which we explored the use of epistemic markers used as hedges in the same corpus of RAs. Based on computer readable data, and combining quantitative and qualitative methods, the article argues that boosting deserves particular attention if we want to fully interpret the phenomenon of academic persuasion.https://raei.ua.es/article/view/2009-n22-writing-with-conviction-the-use-of-boosters-in-modelling-persuasion-in-academic-discourses |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Vázquez Orta, Ignacio Giner, Diana |
spellingShingle |
Vázquez Orta, Ignacio Giner, Diana Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses |
author_facet |
Vázquez Orta, Ignacio Giner, Diana |
author_sort |
Vázquez Orta, Ignacio |
title |
Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses |
title_short |
Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses |
title_full |
Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses |
title_fullStr |
Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses |
title_full_unstemmed |
Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses |
title_sort |
writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses |
publisher |
Universidad de Alicante |
series |
Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses |
issn |
0214-4808 2171-861X |
publishDate |
2009-11-01 |
description |
Hedging and boosting are significant communicative resources to construe and attain persuasion in different fields and particular genres of academic writing. They are both two sides of the same coin in the sense that they both contribute to the persuasive import of academic communication. Although boosting is a much less researched phenomenon than hedging, it is a key aspect of rhetorical persuasion in academic writing. This paper is devoted to the analysis of the use of boosters in a corpus of articles from three different disciplines (Marketing, Biology and Mechanical Engineering), and in this sense it is complementary to our previous article (Vázquez and Giner, 2008) in which we explored the use of epistemic markers used as hedges in the same corpus of RAs. Based on computer readable data, and combining quantitative and qualitative methods, the article argues that boosting deserves particular attention if we want to fully interpret the phenomenon of academic persuasion. |
url |
https://raei.ua.es/article/view/2009-n22-writing-with-conviction-the-use-of-boosters-in-modelling-persuasion-in-academic-discourses |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vazquezortaignacio writingwithconvictiontheuseofboostersinmodellingpersuasioninacademicdiscourses AT ginerdiana writingwithconvictiontheuseofboostersinmodellingpersuasioninacademicdiscourses |
_version_ |
1725124644788240384 |