It Takes Two to Tango: An Introduction

(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(2), 745-754 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Evolving legal questions surrounding Art. 267 TFEU. - III. Stocktaking: the procedure under pressure? - IV. Contributing to the academic debate. - V. Ove...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jasper Krommendijk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) 2020-12-01
Series:European Papers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/it-takes-two-to-tango-introduction
id doaj-83a678a585144a5eaa23a3298ebb6c19
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83a678a585144a5eaa23a3298ebb6c192021-01-03T17:53:11ZengEuropean Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)European Papers2499-82492020-12-012020 5274575410.15166/2499-8249/410It Takes Two to Tango: An IntroductionJasper Krommendijk0Radboud University Nijmegen(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(2), 745-754 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Evolving legal questions surrounding Art. 267 TFEU. - III. Stocktaking: the procedure under pressure? - IV. Contributing to the academic debate. - V. Overview of the Special Section. - V.1. Factors and motives to refer. - V.2. Quality of Court of Justice answers and dialogue. - V.3. Implementation of Court of Justice judgments. | (Abstract) The most important procedure of EU law is the preliminary ruling procedure. Academic scrutiny by way of a Special Section is pertinent for three reasons. Firstly, there are still many out-standing legal and practical questions with respect to Art. 267 TFEU as illustrated by the continuous flow of new judgments of the Court of Justice and European Court of Human Rights. Secondly, there are growing allegations that (some) national court judges are dissatisfied with the procedure, their interaction with the Court of Justice and the resulting answers. Thirdly, there has been little (empirical) research into the effective functioning of the procedure and its application by national courts. The Articles of this Special Section examine - often in an empirical way on the basis of interviews or questionnaires - why national courts refer (or not), what they think of their interaction with the Court of Justice and whether and how they implement the answers of the Court of Justice.https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/it-takes-two-to-tango-introductionpreliminary ruling procedurejudicial dialoguenational courtscilfitmotives to refer(dis)satisfaction with court of justice judgments
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jasper Krommendijk
spellingShingle Jasper Krommendijk
It Takes Two to Tango: An Introduction
European Papers
preliminary ruling procedure
judicial dialogue
national courts
cilfit
motives to refer
(dis)satisfaction with court of justice judgments
author_facet Jasper Krommendijk
author_sort Jasper Krommendijk
title It Takes Two to Tango: An Introduction
title_short It Takes Two to Tango: An Introduction
title_full It Takes Two to Tango: An Introduction
title_fullStr It Takes Two to Tango: An Introduction
title_full_unstemmed It Takes Two to Tango: An Introduction
title_sort it takes two to tango: an introduction
publisher European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)
series European Papers
issn 2499-8249
publishDate 2020-12-01
description (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(2), 745-754 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Evolving legal questions surrounding Art. 267 TFEU. - III. Stocktaking: the procedure under pressure? - IV. Contributing to the academic debate. - V. Overview of the Special Section. - V.1. Factors and motives to refer. - V.2. Quality of Court of Justice answers and dialogue. - V.3. Implementation of Court of Justice judgments. | (Abstract) The most important procedure of EU law is the preliminary ruling procedure. Academic scrutiny by way of a Special Section is pertinent for three reasons. Firstly, there are still many out-standing legal and practical questions with respect to Art. 267 TFEU as illustrated by the continuous flow of new judgments of the Court of Justice and European Court of Human Rights. Secondly, there are growing allegations that (some) national court judges are dissatisfied with the procedure, their interaction with the Court of Justice and the resulting answers. Thirdly, there has been little (empirical) research into the effective functioning of the procedure and its application by national courts. The Articles of this Special Section examine - often in an empirical way on the basis of interviews or questionnaires - why national courts refer (or not), what they think of their interaction with the Court of Justice and whether and how they implement the answers of the Court of Justice.
topic preliminary ruling procedure
judicial dialogue
national courts
cilfit
motives to refer
(dis)satisfaction with court of justice judgments
url https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/it-takes-two-to-tango-introduction
work_keys_str_mv AT jasperkrommendijk ittakestwototangoanintroduction
_version_ 1724350353035493376