Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019)

Weisser (2019) reanalyzes the Breton rannig, Busan Korean interrogative complementizer alternations, and West-Germanic complementizer agreement as allomorphy instead of agreement, and proposes a set of diagnostics to distinguish allomorphy from agreement. While the cases for Breton and Busan Korean...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Astrid van Alem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2020-05-01
Series:Glossa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1069
id doaj-83a3ae85c1ed4a27a30d252ac00afcb7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83a3ae85c1ed4a27a30d252ac00afcb72021-09-02T14:47:50ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352020-05-015110.5334/gjgl.1069493Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019)Astrid van Alem0Leiden University, LeidenWeisser (2019) reanalyzes the Breton rannig, Busan Korean interrogative complementizer alternations, and West-Germanic complementizer agreement as allomorphy instead of agreement, and proposes a set of diagnostics to distinguish allomorphy from agreement. While the cases for Breton and Busan Korean are convincing and the results coherent, West-Germanic complementizer agreement diverges in several respects. In this squib, I review the three case studies and show that the argument for analyzing West-Germanic complementizer agreement as allomorphy does not hold up. In addition, I discuss three new data points on complementizer agreement that cannot be analyzed with a PF account. Accepting that complementizer agreement is not allomorphy allows us to revise the diagnostics to distinguish allomorphy from agreement to a stricter set.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1069allomorphyagreementcomplementizer agreement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Astrid van Alem
spellingShingle Astrid van Alem
Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019)
Glossa
allomorphy
agreement
complementizer agreement
author_facet Astrid van Alem
author_sort Astrid van Alem
title Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019)
title_short Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019)
title_full Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019)
title_fullStr Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019)
title_full_unstemmed Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019)
title_sort complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: a reply to weisser (2019)
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Glossa
issn 2397-1835
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Weisser (2019) reanalyzes the Breton rannig, Busan Korean interrogative complementizer alternations, and West-Germanic complementizer agreement as allomorphy instead of agreement, and proposes a set of diagnostics to distinguish allomorphy from agreement. While the cases for Breton and Busan Korean are convincing and the results coherent, West-Germanic complementizer agreement diverges in several respects. In this squib, I review the three case studies and show that the argument for analyzing West-Germanic complementizer agreement as allomorphy does not hold up. In addition, I discuss three new data points on complementizer agreement that cannot be analyzed with a PF account. Accepting that complementizer agreement is not allomorphy allows us to revise the diagnostics to distinguish allomorphy from agreement to a stricter set.
topic allomorphy
agreement
complementizer agreement
url https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1069
work_keys_str_mv AT astridvanalem complementizeragreementisnotallomorphyareplytoweisser2019
_version_ 1721174261311209472