Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019)
Weisser (2019) reanalyzes the Breton rannig, Busan Korean interrogative complementizer alternations, and West-Germanic complementizer agreement as allomorphy instead of agreement, and proposes a set of diagnostics to distinguish allomorphy from agreement. While the cases for Breton and Busan Korean...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Library of Humanities
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Glossa |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1069 |
id |
doaj-83a3ae85c1ed4a27a30d252ac00afcb7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-83a3ae85c1ed4a27a30d252ac00afcb72021-09-02T14:47:50ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352020-05-015110.5334/gjgl.1069493Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019)Astrid van Alem0Leiden University, LeidenWeisser (2019) reanalyzes the Breton rannig, Busan Korean interrogative complementizer alternations, and West-Germanic complementizer agreement as allomorphy instead of agreement, and proposes a set of diagnostics to distinguish allomorphy from agreement. While the cases for Breton and Busan Korean are convincing and the results coherent, West-Germanic complementizer agreement diverges in several respects. In this squib, I review the three case studies and show that the argument for analyzing West-Germanic complementizer agreement as allomorphy does not hold up. In addition, I discuss three new data points on complementizer agreement that cannot be analyzed with a PF account. Accepting that complementizer agreement is not allomorphy allows us to revise the diagnostics to distinguish allomorphy from agreement to a stricter set.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1069allomorphyagreementcomplementizer agreement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Astrid van Alem |
spellingShingle |
Astrid van Alem Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019) Glossa allomorphy agreement complementizer agreement |
author_facet |
Astrid van Alem |
author_sort |
Astrid van Alem |
title |
Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019) |
title_short |
Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019) |
title_full |
Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019) |
title_fullStr |
Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: A reply to Weisser (2019) |
title_sort |
complementizer agreement is not allomorphy: a reply to weisser (2019) |
publisher |
Open Library of Humanities |
series |
Glossa |
issn |
2397-1835 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
Weisser (2019) reanalyzes the Breton rannig, Busan Korean interrogative complementizer alternations, and West-Germanic complementizer agreement as allomorphy instead of agreement, and proposes a set of diagnostics to distinguish allomorphy from agreement. While the cases for Breton and Busan Korean are convincing and the results coherent, West-Germanic complementizer agreement diverges in several respects. In this squib, I review the three case studies and show that the argument for analyzing West-Germanic complementizer agreement as allomorphy does not hold up. In addition, I discuss three new data points on complementizer agreement that cannot be analyzed with a PF account. Accepting that complementizer agreement is not allomorphy allows us to revise the diagnostics to distinguish allomorphy from agreement to a stricter set. |
topic |
allomorphy agreement complementizer agreement |
url |
https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1069 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT astridvanalem complementizeragreementisnotallomorphyareplytoweisser2019 |
_version_ |
1721174261311209472 |