Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Persistent Submacular Fluid after Successful Repair of Diabetic Tractional Retinal Detachment

This study is for reporting the outcomes of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling on persistent submacular fluid (PSF) after otherwise successful pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for diabetic tractional retinal detachment (TRD). In this retrospective case series, five consecutive patients (5 eyes) who...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Byung Ju Jung, Sohee Jeon, Kook Lee, Jiwon Baek, Won Ki Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8074960
id doaj-839a4f81363d468489f3db9947a2d6e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-839a4f81363d468489f3db9947a2d6e62020-11-25T02:19:00ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582019-01-01201910.1155/2019/80749608074960Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Persistent Submacular Fluid after Successful Repair of Diabetic Tractional Retinal DetachmentByung Ju Jung0Sohee Jeon1Kook Lee2Jiwon Baek3Won Ki Lee4Apgujung St. Mary’s Eye Center, Seoul, Republic of KoreaKeye Eye Center, Seoul, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nune Eye Hospital, Seoul, Republic of KoreaThis study is for reporting the outcomes of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling on persistent submacular fluid (PSF) after otherwise successful pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for diabetic tractional retinal detachment (TRD). In this retrospective case series, five consecutive patients (5 eyes) who exhibited PSF following successful repair of diabetic TRD were included. The second operation was performed to remove ILM. The area of ILM peeling was expanded up to the major vascular arcade. Only air tamponade was used. The median interval between the first PPV and the second PPV with ILM peeling was 4.8 months (range: 4–6 months). PSF resolved completely within one (2 eyes) or 2 months after ILM peeling. The median logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was improved from 1.00 (Snellen equivalent 20/200) to 0.70 (Snellen equivalent 20/100). In conclusion, wide ILM peeling is an effective treatment option for PSF subsequent to successful repair of diabetic TRD. ILM peeling might increase the elasticity of retina, thereby allowing the retina to flatten. This procedure can induce faster retinal reattachment in diabetic TRD involving the macula.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8074960
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Byung Ju Jung
Sohee Jeon
Kook Lee
Jiwon Baek
Won Ki Lee
spellingShingle Byung Ju Jung
Sohee Jeon
Kook Lee
Jiwon Baek
Won Ki Lee
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Persistent Submacular Fluid after Successful Repair of Diabetic Tractional Retinal Detachment
Journal of Ophthalmology
author_facet Byung Ju Jung
Sohee Jeon
Kook Lee
Jiwon Baek
Won Ki Lee
author_sort Byung Ju Jung
title Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Persistent Submacular Fluid after Successful Repair of Diabetic Tractional Retinal Detachment
title_short Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Persistent Submacular Fluid after Successful Repair of Diabetic Tractional Retinal Detachment
title_full Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Persistent Submacular Fluid after Successful Repair of Diabetic Tractional Retinal Detachment
title_fullStr Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Persistent Submacular Fluid after Successful Repair of Diabetic Tractional Retinal Detachment
title_full_unstemmed Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Persistent Submacular Fluid after Successful Repair of Diabetic Tractional Retinal Detachment
title_sort internal limiting membrane peeling for persistent submacular fluid after successful repair of diabetic tractional retinal detachment
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
publishDate 2019-01-01
description This study is for reporting the outcomes of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling on persistent submacular fluid (PSF) after otherwise successful pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for diabetic tractional retinal detachment (TRD). In this retrospective case series, five consecutive patients (5 eyes) who exhibited PSF following successful repair of diabetic TRD were included. The second operation was performed to remove ILM. The area of ILM peeling was expanded up to the major vascular arcade. Only air tamponade was used. The median interval between the first PPV and the second PPV with ILM peeling was 4.8 months (range: 4–6 months). PSF resolved completely within one (2 eyes) or 2 months after ILM peeling. The median logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was improved from 1.00 (Snellen equivalent 20/200) to 0.70 (Snellen equivalent 20/100). In conclusion, wide ILM peeling is an effective treatment option for PSF subsequent to successful repair of diabetic TRD. ILM peeling might increase the elasticity of retina, thereby allowing the retina to flatten. This procedure can induce faster retinal reattachment in diabetic TRD involving the macula.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8074960
work_keys_str_mv AT byungjujung internallimitingmembranepeelingforpersistentsubmacularfluidaftersuccessfulrepairofdiabetictractionalretinaldetachment
AT soheejeon internallimitingmembranepeelingforpersistentsubmacularfluidaftersuccessfulrepairofdiabetictractionalretinaldetachment
AT kooklee internallimitingmembranepeelingforpersistentsubmacularfluidaftersuccessfulrepairofdiabetictractionalretinaldetachment
AT jiwonbaek internallimitingmembranepeelingforpersistentsubmacularfluidaftersuccessfulrepairofdiabetictractionalretinaldetachment
AT wonkilee internallimitingmembranepeelingforpersistentsubmacularfluidaftersuccessfulrepairofdiabetictractionalretinaldetachment
_version_ 1724879271686569984