Nothing Gold Can Stay: Labor, Political Economy, and the Birmingham Legacy of the Culture Industries Debate

Over the course of the last 150 years or so, we can see three distinct phases of the culture industry. More specifically, there have been (at least) three eras marked by different configurations of the relationship between culture, politics, the dominant mode of production and the commodification of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sean Andrews
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cultural Studies Association 2012-05-01
Series:Lateral
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.25158/L1.1.3
id doaj-8389b3e351644abebee3ae7fd43e7070
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8389b3e351644abebee3ae7fd43e70702020-11-25T03:35:36ZengCultural Studies AssociationLateral2469-40532012-05-01110.25158/L1.1.3http://csalateral.org/issue/1/culture-industries-labor-political-economy-birmingham-legacy-andrews/Nothing Gold Can Stay: Labor, Political Economy, and the Birmingham Legacy of the Culture Industries DebateSean AndrewsOver the course of the last 150 years or so, we can see three distinct phases of the culture industry. More specifically, there have been (at least) three eras marked by different configurations of the relationship between culture, politics, the dominant mode of production and the commodification of culture. Cultural Studies emerged from the second era, whose contours I'll explore here; and we are now in a liminal phase brought on by the uncertain conflagration between the neoliberalism, convergence culture, and nascent popular uprisings under the banner (and hashtag) occupyeverywhere. This third phase, or conjuncture, once again reconfigures these relations, making it important to revise the theoretical assumptions and political strategies that were adhered to in an earlier era of 'the culture industry.' I will outline the direction I think this points to both in our understanding of the culture industries and in terms of political and theoretical strategy going forward.https://doi.org/10.25158/L1.1.3culture industrieslaborpolitical economybirminghamcultural studies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sean Andrews
spellingShingle Sean Andrews
Nothing Gold Can Stay: Labor, Political Economy, and the Birmingham Legacy of the Culture Industries Debate
Lateral
culture industries
labor
political economy
birmingham
cultural studies
author_facet Sean Andrews
author_sort Sean Andrews
title Nothing Gold Can Stay: Labor, Political Economy, and the Birmingham Legacy of the Culture Industries Debate
title_short Nothing Gold Can Stay: Labor, Political Economy, and the Birmingham Legacy of the Culture Industries Debate
title_full Nothing Gold Can Stay: Labor, Political Economy, and the Birmingham Legacy of the Culture Industries Debate
title_fullStr Nothing Gold Can Stay: Labor, Political Economy, and the Birmingham Legacy of the Culture Industries Debate
title_full_unstemmed Nothing Gold Can Stay: Labor, Political Economy, and the Birmingham Legacy of the Culture Industries Debate
title_sort nothing gold can stay: labor, political economy, and the birmingham legacy of the culture industries debate
publisher Cultural Studies Association
series Lateral
issn 2469-4053
publishDate 2012-05-01
description Over the course of the last 150 years or so, we can see three distinct phases of the culture industry. More specifically, there have been (at least) three eras marked by different configurations of the relationship between culture, politics, the dominant mode of production and the commodification of culture. Cultural Studies emerged from the second era, whose contours I'll explore here; and we are now in a liminal phase brought on by the uncertain conflagration between the neoliberalism, convergence culture, and nascent popular uprisings under the banner (and hashtag) occupyeverywhere. This third phase, or conjuncture, once again reconfigures these relations, making it important to revise the theoretical assumptions and political strategies that were adhered to in an earlier era of 'the culture industry.' I will outline the direction I think this points to both in our understanding of the culture industries and in terms of political and theoretical strategy going forward.
topic culture industries
labor
political economy
birmingham
cultural studies
url https://doi.org/10.25158/L1.1.3
work_keys_str_mv AT seanandrews nothinggoldcanstaylaborpoliticaleconomyandthebirminghamlegacyofthecultureindustriesdebate
_version_ 1724553477081792512