Combined robotic approach and enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for optimization of costs in patients undergoing proctectomy

Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are beneficial in proctocolectomy, but their impact on robotic low rectal proctectomy is not fully investigated. This study assessed the impact of an ERAS pathway on the outcomes and cost of robotic (RTME) versus laparoscopic (LTME) total me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Rouanet, A. Mermoud, M. Jarlier, N. Bouazza, A. Laine, H. Mathieu Daudé
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2020-06-01
Series:BJS Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50281
id doaj-8378cf2c2c5a4193841f34cfa439b29a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8378cf2c2c5a4193841f34cfa439b29a2021-04-02T15:32:32ZengOxford University PressBJS Open2474-98422020-06-014351652310.1002/bjs5.50281Combined robotic approach and enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for optimization of costs in patients undergoing proctectomyP. Rouanet0A. Mermoud1M. Jarlier2N. Bouazza3A. Laine4H. Mathieu Daudé5Surgical Oncological Department Montpellier FranceFinancial Department Montpellier FranceBiometrics Unit Montpellier FranceClinical Research and Innovation Department Montpellier FranceHealth Information Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute University of Montpellier Montpellier FranceHealth Information Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute University of Montpellier Montpellier FranceBackground Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are beneficial in proctocolectomy, but their impact on robotic low rectal proctectomy is not fully investigated. This study assessed the impact of an ERAS pathway on the outcomes and cost of robotic (RTME) versus laparoscopic (LTME) total mesorectal excision. Methods A retrospective review was performed of patients with rectal cancer in a single French tertiary centre for three yearly periods: 2011, LTME; 2015, RTME; and 2018, RTME with ERAS. Patient characteristics, operative and postoperative data, and costs were compared among the groups. Results A total of 220 consecutive proctectomies were analysed (71 LTME, 58 RTME and 91 RTME with ERAS). A prevalence of lower and locally advanced tumours was observed with RTME. The median duration of surgery increased with the introduction of RTME, but became shorter than that for LTME with greater robotic experience (226, 233 and 180 min for 2011, 2015 and 2018 respectively; P < 0·001). The median duration of hospital stay decreased significantly for RTME with ERAS (11, 10 and 8 days respectively; P = 0·011), as did the overall morbidity rate (39, 38 and 16 per cent; P = 0·002). Pathology results, conversion and defunctioning stoma rates remained stable. RTME alone increased the total cost by €2348 compared with LTME. The introduction of ERAS and improved robotic experience decreased costs by €1960, compared with RTME performed in 2015 without ERAS implementation. In patients with no co‐morbidity, costs decreased by €596 for RTME with ERAS versus LTME alone. Conclusion ERAS is associated with cost reductions in patients undergoing robotic proctectomy.https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50281
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P. Rouanet
A. Mermoud
M. Jarlier
N. Bouazza
A. Laine
H. Mathieu Daudé
spellingShingle P. Rouanet
A. Mermoud
M. Jarlier
N. Bouazza
A. Laine
H. Mathieu Daudé
Combined robotic approach and enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for optimization of costs in patients undergoing proctectomy
BJS Open
author_facet P. Rouanet
A. Mermoud
M. Jarlier
N. Bouazza
A. Laine
H. Mathieu Daudé
author_sort P. Rouanet
title Combined robotic approach and enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for optimization of costs in patients undergoing proctectomy
title_short Combined robotic approach and enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for optimization of costs in patients undergoing proctectomy
title_full Combined robotic approach and enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for optimization of costs in patients undergoing proctectomy
title_fullStr Combined robotic approach and enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for optimization of costs in patients undergoing proctectomy
title_full_unstemmed Combined robotic approach and enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for optimization of costs in patients undergoing proctectomy
title_sort combined robotic approach and enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for optimization of costs in patients undergoing proctectomy
publisher Oxford University Press
series BJS Open
issn 2474-9842
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are beneficial in proctocolectomy, but their impact on robotic low rectal proctectomy is not fully investigated. This study assessed the impact of an ERAS pathway on the outcomes and cost of robotic (RTME) versus laparoscopic (LTME) total mesorectal excision. Methods A retrospective review was performed of patients with rectal cancer in a single French tertiary centre for three yearly periods: 2011, LTME; 2015, RTME; and 2018, RTME with ERAS. Patient characteristics, operative and postoperative data, and costs were compared among the groups. Results A total of 220 consecutive proctectomies were analysed (71 LTME, 58 RTME and 91 RTME with ERAS). A prevalence of lower and locally advanced tumours was observed with RTME. The median duration of surgery increased with the introduction of RTME, but became shorter than that for LTME with greater robotic experience (226, 233 and 180 min for 2011, 2015 and 2018 respectively; P < 0·001). The median duration of hospital stay decreased significantly for RTME with ERAS (11, 10 and 8 days respectively; P = 0·011), as did the overall morbidity rate (39, 38 and 16 per cent; P = 0·002). Pathology results, conversion and defunctioning stoma rates remained stable. RTME alone increased the total cost by €2348 compared with LTME. The introduction of ERAS and improved robotic experience decreased costs by €1960, compared with RTME performed in 2015 without ERAS implementation. In patients with no co‐morbidity, costs decreased by €596 for RTME with ERAS versus LTME alone. Conclusion ERAS is associated with cost reductions in patients undergoing robotic proctectomy.
url https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50281
work_keys_str_mv AT prouanet combinedroboticapproachandenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerypathwayforoptimizationofcostsinpatientsundergoingproctectomy
AT amermoud combinedroboticapproachandenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerypathwayforoptimizationofcostsinpatientsundergoingproctectomy
AT mjarlier combinedroboticapproachandenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerypathwayforoptimizationofcostsinpatientsundergoingproctectomy
AT nbouazza combinedroboticapproachandenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerypathwayforoptimizationofcostsinpatientsundergoingproctectomy
AT alaine combinedroboticapproachandenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerypathwayforoptimizationofcostsinpatientsundergoingproctectomy
AT hmathieudaude combinedroboticapproachandenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerypathwayforoptimizationofcostsinpatientsundergoingproctectomy
_version_ 1721559793712234496