Anti-osteoporosis Medication Use in a High Fracture-Risk Population: Contemporary Trends in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities

Osteoporotic fractures impose substantial morbidity and mortality among older adults. Undertreatment is an ongoing concern; treatment rates declined following reports of adverse effects of guideline-recommended bisphosphonates, but new antiresorptives have since become available. Our goal was to ide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kimberly E Lind, Mikaela L Jorgensen, Leonard C Gray, Andrew Georgiou, Johanna I Westbrook
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-05-01
Series:Health Services Insights
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1178632919852111
id doaj-8374aa18a95e4dc99458ace77ba3ee9d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8374aa18a95e4dc99458ace77ba3ee9d2020-11-25T03:24:17ZengSAGE PublishingHealth Services Insights1178-63292019-05-011210.1177/1178632919852111Anti-osteoporosis Medication Use in a High Fracture-Risk Population: Contemporary Trends in Australian Residential Aged Care FacilitiesKimberly E Lind0Mikaela L Jorgensen1Leonard C Gray2Andrew Georgiou3Johanna I Westbrook4Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, AustraliaCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaOsteoporotic fractures impose substantial morbidity and mortality among older adults. Undertreatment is an ongoing concern; treatment rates declined following reports of adverse effects of guideline-recommended bisphosphonates, but new antiresorptives have since become available. Our goal was to identify contemporary trends in osteoporosis treatment guideline adherence in a high fracture-risk population. We conducted a secondary data analysis using electronic health record data of adults aged ⩾65 years from 68 residential aged care facilities in Australia during 2014-2017 (n = 9094). Using medication administration data, we identified antiresorptive (bisphosphonates and denosumab) and vitamin D supplement use among residents with osteoporosis. Regression was used to evaluate temporal trends, and resident and facility characteristics associated with antiresorptive use and vitamin D use. In 2014, 34% of women and 42% of men with osteoporosis used antiresorptives; this decreased 8 percentage points by 2017. Antiresorptive use was higher among those with a history of fracture and lower in the last year of life. Denosumab use increased but did not substitute for the continued decline in bisphosphonate use. Vitamin D was consistently used by more than 60% of residents and was higher among those with fracture history. Greater attention to the treatment of osteoporosis treatment rates among this high fracture-risk population is warranted.https://doi.org/10.1177/1178632919852111
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kimberly E Lind
Mikaela L Jorgensen
Leonard C Gray
Andrew Georgiou
Johanna I Westbrook
spellingShingle Kimberly E Lind
Mikaela L Jorgensen
Leonard C Gray
Andrew Georgiou
Johanna I Westbrook
Anti-osteoporosis Medication Use in a High Fracture-Risk Population: Contemporary Trends in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities
Health Services Insights
author_facet Kimberly E Lind
Mikaela L Jorgensen
Leonard C Gray
Andrew Georgiou
Johanna I Westbrook
author_sort Kimberly E Lind
title Anti-osteoporosis Medication Use in a High Fracture-Risk Population: Contemporary Trends in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities
title_short Anti-osteoporosis Medication Use in a High Fracture-Risk Population: Contemporary Trends in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities
title_full Anti-osteoporosis Medication Use in a High Fracture-Risk Population: Contemporary Trends in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities
title_fullStr Anti-osteoporosis Medication Use in a High Fracture-Risk Population: Contemporary Trends in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities
title_full_unstemmed Anti-osteoporosis Medication Use in a High Fracture-Risk Population: Contemporary Trends in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities
title_sort anti-osteoporosis medication use in a high fracture-risk population: contemporary trends in australian residential aged care facilities
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Health Services Insights
issn 1178-6329
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Osteoporotic fractures impose substantial morbidity and mortality among older adults. Undertreatment is an ongoing concern; treatment rates declined following reports of adverse effects of guideline-recommended bisphosphonates, but new antiresorptives have since become available. Our goal was to identify contemporary trends in osteoporosis treatment guideline adherence in a high fracture-risk population. We conducted a secondary data analysis using electronic health record data of adults aged ⩾65 years from 68 residential aged care facilities in Australia during 2014-2017 (n = 9094). Using medication administration data, we identified antiresorptive (bisphosphonates and denosumab) and vitamin D supplement use among residents with osteoporosis. Regression was used to evaluate temporal trends, and resident and facility characteristics associated with antiresorptive use and vitamin D use. In 2014, 34% of women and 42% of men with osteoporosis used antiresorptives; this decreased 8 percentage points by 2017. Antiresorptive use was higher among those with a history of fracture and lower in the last year of life. Denosumab use increased but did not substitute for the continued decline in bisphosphonate use. Vitamin D was consistently used by more than 60% of residents and was higher among those with fracture history. Greater attention to the treatment of osteoporosis treatment rates among this high fracture-risk population is warranted.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1178632919852111
work_keys_str_mv AT kimberlyelind antiosteoporosismedicationuseinahighfractureriskpopulationcontemporarytrendsinaustralianresidentialagedcarefacilities
AT mikaelaljorgensen antiosteoporosismedicationuseinahighfractureriskpopulationcontemporarytrendsinaustralianresidentialagedcarefacilities
AT leonardcgray antiosteoporosismedicationuseinahighfractureriskpopulationcontemporarytrendsinaustralianresidentialagedcarefacilities
AT andrewgeorgiou antiosteoporosismedicationuseinahighfractureriskpopulationcontemporarytrendsinaustralianresidentialagedcarefacilities
AT johannaiwestbrook antiosteoporosismedicationuseinahighfractureriskpopulationcontemporarytrendsinaustralianresidentialagedcarefacilities
_version_ 1724602363819327488