Team-Designed Improvement of Writing and Critical Thinking in Large Undergraduate Courses

Helping students achieve advanced critical thinking and writing skills in large undergraduate classes is a challenge faced by many university faculty members. We addressed this challenge in a three-year project using team course design, built around a cognitive apprenticeship model, to enhance under...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Bernstein, Andrea Follmer Greenhoot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Calgary 2014-03-01
Series:Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
Online Access:http://tlijournal.com/tli/index.php/TLI/article/view/72
id doaj-836ca77f4c484b47be15dd2288dbfe8c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-836ca77f4c484b47be15dd2288dbfe8c2020-11-25T03:28:21ZengUniversity of CalgaryTeaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal2167-47792167-47872014-03-0121396110.20343/teachlearninqu.2.1.3952Team-Designed Improvement of Writing and Critical Thinking in Large Undergraduate CoursesDaniel Bernstein0Andrea Follmer Greenhoot1UNIVERSITY OF KANSASUNIVERSITY OF KANSASHelping students achieve advanced critical thinking and writing skills in large undergraduate classes is a challenge faced by many university faculty members. We addressed this challenge in a three-year project using team course design, built around a cognitive apprenticeship model, to enhance undergraduates’ writing, critical thinking, and research skills in courses ranging in size from 70 to over 400 students. Faculty members partnered with specialists from the university library, writing center, and teaching center, and with graduate student fellows who received supplemental training in those units. Together they designed progressive learning activities and written assignments based on meaningful, situated critical thinking scenarios. Instruction teams also developed rubrics for tracking students’ progress on each step, and they used this information to inform the next wave of course enhancements and generate continual and iterative improvement. Assessments developed by the instruction teams showed that students in the team-designed courses improved in their critical thinking and writing skills from the beginning to the end of the semester. Furthermore, an evaluation of student work from the team-designed courses using the AA C&U Value rubrics showed that these students displayed more advanced critical thinking and writing skills than students in roughly comparable but conventionally designed courses. Our results demonstrate that team design involving specialists and graduate students can be a feasible and worthwhile strategy for engaging faculty members in developing advanced instructional and assessment designs that enhance high-end learning in a large university setting.http://tlijournal.com/tli/index.php/TLI/article/view/72
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel Bernstein
Andrea Follmer Greenhoot
spellingShingle Daniel Bernstein
Andrea Follmer Greenhoot
Team-Designed Improvement of Writing and Critical Thinking in Large Undergraduate Courses
Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
author_facet Daniel Bernstein
Andrea Follmer Greenhoot
author_sort Daniel Bernstein
title Team-Designed Improvement of Writing and Critical Thinking in Large Undergraduate Courses
title_short Team-Designed Improvement of Writing and Critical Thinking in Large Undergraduate Courses
title_full Team-Designed Improvement of Writing and Critical Thinking in Large Undergraduate Courses
title_fullStr Team-Designed Improvement of Writing and Critical Thinking in Large Undergraduate Courses
title_full_unstemmed Team-Designed Improvement of Writing and Critical Thinking in Large Undergraduate Courses
title_sort team-designed improvement of writing and critical thinking in large undergraduate courses
publisher University of Calgary
series Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
issn 2167-4779
2167-4787
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Helping students achieve advanced critical thinking and writing skills in large undergraduate classes is a challenge faced by many university faculty members. We addressed this challenge in a three-year project using team course design, built around a cognitive apprenticeship model, to enhance undergraduates’ writing, critical thinking, and research skills in courses ranging in size from 70 to over 400 students. Faculty members partnered with specialists from the university library, writing center, and teaching center, and with graduate student fellows who received supplemental training in those units. Together they designed progressive learning activities and written assignments based on meaningful, situated critical thinking scenarios. Instruction teams also developed rubrics for tracking students’ progress on each step, and they used this information to inform the next wave of course enhancements and generate continual and iterative improvement. Assessments developed by the instruction teams showed that students in the team-designed courses improved in their critical thinking and writing skills from the beginning to the end of the semester. Furthermore, an evaluation of student work from the team-designed courses using the AA C&U Value rubrics showed that these students displayed more advanced critical thinking and writing skills than students in roughly comparable but conventionally designed courses. Our results demonstrate that team design involving specialists and graduate students can be a feasible and worthwhile strategy for engaging faculty members in developing advanced instructional and assessment designs that enhance high-end learning in a large university setting.
url http://tlijournal.com/tli/index.php/TLI/article/view/72
work_keys_str_mv AT danielbernstein teamdesignedimprovementofwritingandcriticalthinkinginlargeundergraduatecourses
AT andreafollmergreenhoot teamdesignedimprovementofwritingandcriticalthinkinginlargeundergraduatecourses
_version_ 1724584769200586752