Models of Workplace Incivility: The Relationships to Instigated Incivility and Negative Outcomes

The aim of the study was to investigate workplace incivility as a social process, examining its components and relationships to both instigated incivility and negative outcomes in the form of well-being, job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and sleeping problems. The different components of incivi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristoffer Holm, Eva Torkelson, Martin Bäckström
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/920239
id doaj-83626d4bbd574d818672553c54bb4adb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83626d4bbd574d818672553c54bb4adb2020-11-24T22:16:59ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412015-01-01201510.1155/2015/920239920239Models of Workplace Incivility: The Relationships to Instigated Incivility and Negative OutcomesKristoffer Holm0Eva Torkelson1Martin Bäckström2Department of Psychology, Lund University, P.O. Box 213, 221 00 Lund, SwedenDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, P.O. Box 213, 221 00 Lund, SwedenDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, P.O. Box 213, 221 00 Lund, SwedenThe aim of the study was to investigate workplace incivility as a social process, examining its components and relationships to both instigated incivility and negative outcomes in the form of well-being, job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and sleeping problems. The different components of incivility that were examined were experienced and witnessed incivility from coworkers as well as supervisors. In addition, the organizational factors, social support, control, and job demands, were included in the models. A total of 2871 (2058 women and 813 men) employees who were connected to the Swedish Hotel and Restaurant Workers Union completed an online questionnaire. Overall, the results from structural equation modelling indicate that whereas instigated incivility to a large extent was explained by witnessing coworker incivility, negative outcomes were to a high degree explained by experienced supervisor incivility via mediation through perceived low social support, low control, and high job demands. Unexpectedly, the relationships between incivility (experienced coworker and supervisor incivility, as well as witnessed supervisor incivility) and instigated incivility were moderated by perceived high control and high social support. The results highlight the importance of including different components of workplace incivility and organizational factors in future studies of the area.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/920239
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kristoffer Holm
Eva Torkelson
Martin Bäckström
spellingShingle Kristoffer Holm
Eva Torkelson
Martin Bäckström
Models of Workplace Incivility: The Relationships to Instigated Incivility and Negative Outcomes
BioMed Research International
author_facet Kristoffer Holm
Eva Torkelson
Martin Bäckström
author_sort Kristoffer Holm
title Models of Workplace Incivility: The Relationships to Instigated Incivility and Negative Outcomes
title_short Models of Workplace Incivility: The Relationships to Instigated Incivility and Negative Outcomes
title_full Models of Workplace Incivility: The Relationships to Instigated Incivility and Negative Outcomes
title_fullStr Models of Workplace Incivility: The Relationships to Instigated Incivility and Negative Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Models of Workplace Incivility: The Relationships to Instigated Incivility and Negative Outcomes
title_sort models of workplace incivility: the relationships to instigated incivility and negative outcomes
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The aim of the study was to investigate workplace incivility as a social process, examining its components and relationships to both instigated incivility and negative outcomes in the form of well-being, job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and sleeping problems. The different components of incivility that were examined were experienced and witnessed incivility from coworkers as well as supervisors. In addition, the organizational factors, social support, control, and job demands, were included in the models. A total of 2871 (2058 women and 813 men) employees who were connected to the Swedish Hotel and Restaurant Workers Union completed an online questionnaire. Overall, the results from structural equation modelling indicate that whereas instigated incivility to a large extent was explained by witnessing coworker incivility, negative outcomes were to a high degree explained by experienced supervisor incivility via mediation through perceived low social support, low control, and high job demands. Unexpectedly, the relationships between incivility (experienced coworker and supervisor incivility, as well as witnessed supervisor incivility) and instigated incivility were moderated by perceived high control and high social support. The results highlight the importance of including different components of workplace incivility and organizational factors in future studies of the area.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/920239
work_keys_str_mv AT kristofferholm modelsofworkplaceincivilitytherelationshipstoinstigatedincivilityandnegativeoutcomes
AT evatorkelson modelsofworkplaceincivilitytherelationshipstoinstigatedincivilityandnegativeoutcomes
AT martinbackstrom modelsofworkplaceincivilitytherelationshipstoinstigatedincivilityandnegativeoutcomes
_version_ 1725787214293499904