Atmospheric Effects on RTK Network in Florida
Commonly used real time kinematic (RTK) network (RTK Network) techniques, i.e., MAX, I-MAX, FKP and VRS, are tested by taking monthly measurements for a year in Florida. Additionally, RTCM message versions 2 and 3 are used with I-MAX and VRS measurements. The results revealed that mostly, horizontal...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Universidade Federal do Paraná
|
Series: | Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1982-21702015000400814&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-836178302d93470498f9d164ad2f0bc0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-836178302d93470498f9d164ad2f0bc02020-11-24T23:37:35ZporUniversidade Federal do ParanáBoletim de Ciências Geodésicas1982-217021481483110.1590/S1982-21702015000300048S1982-21702015000400814Atmospheric Effects on RTK Network in FloridaM. BerberN. ArslanCommonly used real time kinematic (RTK) network (RTK Network) techniques, i.e., MAX, I-MAX, FKP and VRS, are tested by taking monthly measurements for a year in Florida. Additionally, RTCM message versions 2 and 3 are used with I-MAX and VRS measurements. The results revealed that mostly, horizontal coordinates vary a few centimeters and generally changes in vertical coordinates are less than two decimeters. In terms of horizontal coordinates, the best results are produced by I-MAX3 method and FKP yielded the worst results. In terms of vertical coordinates, almost all results look alike; however, the best results are produced by VRS3 method. It appears that I-MAX3 performed better than I-MAX2 and VRS3 performed better than VRS2. Yet, MAX did not stand out among other techniques.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1982-21702015000400814&lng=en&tlng=enCorreção Master-AuxiliaryRTK em redecorreções RTKEstação de Referência Virtual |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Portuguese |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
M. Berber N. Arslan |
spellingShingle |
M. Berber N. Arslan Atmospheric Effects on RTK Network in Florida Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas Correção Master-Auxiliary RTK em rede correções RTK Estação de Referência Virtual |
author_facet |
M. Berber N. Arslan |
author_sort |
M. Berber |
title |
Atmospheric Effects on RTK Network in Florida |
title_short |
Atmospheric Effects on RTK Network in Florida |
title_full |
Atmospheric Effects on RTK Network in Florida |
title_fullStr |
Atmospheric Effects on RTK Network in Florida |
title_full_unstemmed |
Atmospheric Effects on RTK Network in Florida |
title_sort |
atmospheric effects on rtk network in florida |
publisher |
Universidade Federal do Paraná |
series |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas |
issn |
1982-2170 |
description |
Commonly used real time kinematic (RTK) network (RTK Network) techniques, i.e., MAX, I-MAX, FKP and VRS, are tested by taking monthly measurements for a year in Florida. Additionally, RTCM message versions 2 and 3 are used with I-MAX and VRS measurements. The results revealed that mostly, horizontal coordinates vary a few centimeters and generally changes in vertical coordinates are less than two decimeters. In terms of horizontal coordinates, the best results are produced by I-MAX3 method and FKP yielded the worst results. In terms of vertical coordinates, almost all results look alike; however, the best results are produced by VRS3 method. It appears that I-MAX3 performed better than I-MAX2 and VRS3 performed better than VRS2. Yet, MAX did not stand out among other techniques. |
topic |
Correção Master-Auxiliary RTK em rede correções RTK Estação de Referência Virtual |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1982-21702015000400814&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mberber atmosphericeffectsonrtknetworkinflorida AT narslan atmosphericeffectsonrtknetworkinflorida |
_version_ |
1725519459022536704 |