How much off-the-shelf knowledge is transferable from natural images to pathology images?

Deep learning has achieved a great success in natural image classification. To overcome data-scarcity in computational pathology, recent studies exploit transfer learning to reuse knowledge gained from natural images in pathology image analysis, aiming to build effective pathology image diagnosis mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xingyu Li, Konstantinos N Plataniotis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240530
id doaj-834caed7a54844e08f901c3c795f1359
record_format Article
spelling doaj-834caed7a54844e08f901c3c795f13592021-03-04T11:10:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011510e024053010.1371/journal.pone.0240530How much off-the-shelf knowledge is transferable from natural images to pathology images?Xingyu LiKonstantinos N PlataniotisDeep learning has achieved a great success in natural image classification. To overcome data-scarcity in computational pathology, recent studies exploit transfer learning to reuse knowledge gained from natural images in pathology image analysis, aiming to build effective pathology image diagnosis models. Since transferability of knowledge heavily depends on the similarity of the original and target tasks, significant differences in image content and statistics between pathology images and natural images raise the questions: how much knowledge is transferable? Is the transferred information equally contributed by pre-trained layers? If not, is there a sweet spot in transfer learning that balances transferred model's complexity and performance? To answer these questions, this paper proposes a framework to quantify knowledge gain by a particular layer, conducts an empirical investigation in pathology image centered transfer learning, and reports some interesting observations. Particularly, compared to the performance baseline obtained by a random-weight model, though transferability of off-the-shelf representations from deep layers heavily depend on specific pathology image sets, the general representation generated by early layers does convey transferred knowledge in various image classification applications. The trade-off between transferable performance and transferred model's complexity observed in this study encourages further investigation of specific metric and tools to quantify effectiveness of transfer learning in future.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240530
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xingyu Li
Konstantinos N Plataniotis
spellingShingle Xingyu Li
Konstantinos N Plataniotis
How much off-the-shelf knowledge is transferable from natural images to pathology images?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Xingyu Li
Konstantinos N Plataniotis
author_sort Xingyu Li
title How much off-the-shelf knowledge is transferable from natural images to pathology images?
title_short How much off-the-shelf knowledge is transferable from natural images to pathology images?
title_full How much off-the-shelf knowledge is transferable from natural images to pathology images?
title_fullStr How much off-the-shelf knowledge is transferable from natural images to pathology images?
title_full_unstemmed How much off-the-shelf knowledge is transferable from natural images to pathology images?
title_sort how much off-the-shelf knowledge is transferable from natural images to pathology images?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Deep learning has achieved a great success in natural image classification. To overcome data-scarcity in computational pathology, recent studies exploit transfer learning to reuse knowledge gained from natural images in pathology image analysis, aiming to build effective pathology image diagnosis models. Since transferability of knowledge heavily depends on the similarity of the original and target tasks, significant differences in image content and statistics between pathology images and natural images raise the questions: how much knowledge is transferable? Is the transferred information equally contributed by pre-trained layers? If not, is there a sweet spot in transfer learning that balances transferred model's complexity and performance? To answer these questions, this paper proposes a framework to quantify knowledge gain by a particular layer, conducts an empirical investigation in pathology image centered transfer learning, and reports some interesting observations. Particularly, compared to the performance baseline obtained by a random-weight model, though transferability of off-the-shelf representations from deep layers heavily depend on specific pathology image sets, the general representation generated by early layers does convey transferred knowledge in various image classification applications. The trade-off between transferable performance and transferred model's complexity observed in this study encourages further investigation of specific metric and tools to quantify effectiveness of transfer learning in future.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240530
work_keys_str_mv AT xingyuli howmuchofftheshelfknowledgeistransferablefromnaturalimagestopathologyimages
AT konstantinosnplataniotis howmuchofftheshelfknowledgeistransferablefromnaturalimagestopathologyimages
_version_ 1714804656996089856